SECULARISM, PLURALISM AND RIGHT OF MINORITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1981369444195Keywords:
democracia, direito das minorias, pluralismoAbstract
This article intends to present a conception of pluralism that tries do mediate the political participation of religious groups with a careful protection of the right of minorities. The chief concern is trying to balance, on the one hand, a secular conception of politics that ought to protect rights and fundamental guarantees, avoiding an excessive rationalism, and, on the other hand, an intense political participation of religious groups, one that advance new and important demands, despite a propensity for authoritarianism under a few circumstances. This article adopts literature review of the works of Connolly, Young, Modood, in addition to others. The conclusion is that this theoretical deadlock could be worked out through a conception of pluralism that is open, flexible, dynamic, one in which the political relevance of religious belief coexists side by side with the need of tolerance, epistemic humility and a propensity for continuous self-critique.
Downloads
References
ARFI, Badredine. Pluralism to-come and the debates on Islam and secularism. Philosophy and Social Criticism, v. 41, n. 7, pp. 655-677, 2015.
ASAD, Talal. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.
AYTAÇ, Ahmet Murat. Lifestyle and rights: A neo-secular conception of human dignity. Philosophy and Social Criticism, v. 43, n. 4-5, pp. 1-8, 2016.
BADER, Veit. Moral Minimalism and More Demanding Moralities: Some Reflections on ´Tolerance/Toleration´. In: DOBBERNACK, Jan; MODOOD, Tariq (orgs). Tolerance, Intolerance and Respect: Hard to Accept?. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, pp. 23-51.
BROWN, Wendy. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
BURITY, Joanildo A. Religião, Política e Cultura. Tempo Social - Revista de Sociologia da USP, v. 20, n. 2, pp. 83-113, Nov./2008.
CHANDHOKE, Neera. Rethinking Pluralism, Secularism and Tolerance: Anxieties of Coexistence. New Delhi: Sage Publications India, 2019.
CONNOLLY, William E. A World of Becoming. Durham: Duke University Press, 2011.
CONNOLLY, William E. IdentityDifference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.
CONNOLLY, William E. Pluralism. Durham: Duke University Press, 2005.
CONNOLLY, William E. The Ethos of Democratization. In: CRITCHLEY, Simon; MARCHART, Oliver (org). Laclau: A Critical Reader. London: Routledge, 2004. pp. 167-181.
CONNOLLY, William E. Why I Am Not a Secularist. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
CORNELL, Drucilla. At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, & Equality. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1998.
GLAZER, Nathan. Individual Rights against Group Rights. In: KYMLICKA, Will (org). The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 123-138.
HOWARTH, David. Hegemony, political subjectivity, and radical democracy. In: CRITCHLEY, Simon; MARCHART, Oliver (org). Laclau: A Critical Reader. London: Routledge, 2004. pp. 256-276.
LACLAU, Ernesto; MOUFFE, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso, 1985.
LACLAU, Ernesto; ZAC, Lilian. Minding the Gap: The Subject of Politics. In: LACLAU, Ernesto (org). The Making of Political Identities. London: Verso, 1994. pp. 11-39.
MAY, Stephen; MODOOD, Tariq; SQUIRES, Judith. Ethnicity, nationalism, and minority rights: charting the disciplinary debates. In: MAY, Stephen; MODOOD, Tariq; SQUIRES, Judith (orgs). Ethnicity, Nationalism and Minority Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. pp. 1-23.
MENDONÇA, Daniel de. A Noção de Antagonismo na Ciência Política Contemporânea: Uma análise a partir da perspectiva da teoria do discurso. Revista de Sociologia e Política, n. 20, pp. 135-145, 2003.
MENDONÇA, Daniel de. Antagonismo como identificação política. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, Brasília, n. 9, pp. 205-228, Set./Dez., 2012.
MODOOD, Tariq. Moderate Secularism, Religion as Identity and Respect for Religion. The Political Quarterly, v. 81, n. 1, pp. 4-14, March/2010.
MODOOD, Tariq. Muslims and the Politics of Difference. The Political Quarterly, v. 74, n. s1, pp. 100-115, Aug./2003.
OFFE, Claus. "Homogeneity" and Constitutional Democracy: Coping with Identity Conflicts through Group Rights. The Journal of Political Philosophy, v. 6, n. 2, pp. 113-141, 1998.
REHG, Bill. Reason and Rhetoric in Habermas´s Theory of Argumentation. In: JOST, Walter; HYDE, Michael (orgs). Rhetoric and Hermeneutics in Our Time. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.
SCHAAP, Andrew. Agonism in divided societies. Philosophy and Social Criticism, v. 32, n. 2, pp. 255-277, 2006.
SPRAGENS, Thomas. Reason and Democracy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1990.
TAYLOR, Charles. Como definir secularismo. Leviathan: Cadernos de Pesquisa Política, n. 14, pp. 128-146, 2017.
WALZER, Michal. Pluralism: A Political Perspective. In: KYMLICKA, Will (org). The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 139-154.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1990.
YOUNG, Iris Marion. Together in Difference: Transforming the Logic of Group Political Conflict. In: KYMLICKA, Will (org). The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 155-178.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Eletrônica do Curso de Direito da UFSM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0 Internacional.