Georreferenciamento de espécies arbóreas como ferramenta para a educação ambiental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613085686Keywords:
Identification, Preservation, Tree specimens, LandscapingAbstract
The Polytechnic College landscaping department, of Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM) is aplace reserved to native and exotic tree specimens collection with landscaping potential andcapable of use in urban landscaping, gardens and parks. The survey, identification and thegeoreference of these specimens values and qualify the landscape, providing the knowledge ofspecies and its use. Thus, the environment becomes didactic and attractive to the academiccommunity and the general community. This work is very important because of the possibility ofproviding people the technical knowledge, promoting the preservation and environmentalconservation in public green spaces and making it possible forindividual and collective society participation in preserving the environmental balance. The aim ofthis study was to identify, locate and label the small, medium and large trees (native and exotic),with landscaping potential, at the Polytechnic College landscaping department, in Santa Maria, RS,as an important tool for environmental education at botanical gardens.
Downloads
References
BACKES, P; IRGANG, B. Árvores cultivadas no Sul do Brasil: Guia de identificação e interesse paisagístico das principais espécies exóticas. Ed. Paisagem do Sul, 2004; 204 p.
BYE, R. 1994. Historia de los jardines botanicos: evolucion de estilos, ideas y funciones. Chapingo (Serie Horticultura) 2:43-53.
CARDOSO-LEITE, Eliana et al. Mapeamento da Vegetação de uma Reserva Biológica no Sudeste do Brasil, Através de Fotointerpretação e Levantamento de Campo, Como Subsídio ao seu Zoneamento e Conservação. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE BOTÂNICA, 50, 1999, Blumenau/SC. Programa e resumos… Blumenau: Soc. Bot. Br., 1999. P. 149.
Carvalho, P. E. R.; Espécies arbóreas brasileiras. Ed. Embrapa Informação Tecnológica, 2003, 1035 p.
CERATI, T. M.; LAZARINI, R. A. M. A pesquisa-ação em Educação Ambiental: Uma experiência no entorno de uma unidade de Conservação Urbana. Revista Ciência e Educação. V. 15, n. 2, p. 383-92, 2009.
DIAS, A. et al. Programa piloto de educação ambiental na trilha do Jacatirão, Ilha de Santa Catarina, Florianópilos. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE BOTÂNICA, 50, 1999, Blumenau/SC. Programas e recursos... Blumenau: Soc. Bot. Br., 1999, p. 51
DOURADO, G. M. Burle Marx: O prazer de viver e trabalhar com a natureza. (Entrevista). Revista Projeto. n.146, p.58-77. São Paulo, 1991.
ELLISON D.; ELLISON A."Cultivated Palms of the World".Ed. UNSW2001;pgs. 257.
FOODY, G.M.; Boyd, D.S.; Cutler, M.E.J. 2003. Predictive relations of tropical forest biomass from Landsat TM data and their transferability between regions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 85(4): 463-474.
GONÇALVEZ, F. C. C. ET. AL. Análise Pós-ocupação de uma praça de Burle Marx em Recife. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE BOTÂNICA, 49, 1998, Salvador/BA. Resumos... Salvador: Soc. Bot. Br., 1908. P. 265.
GUZZO, P. Estudos dos espaços livres de uso público e da cobertura vegetal em área urbana da cidade de Ribeirão Preto-SP. 1999. 106f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geociências) . Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro. 1999.
HEYWOOD, V.H. 1985. Botanic gardens conservation strategy. World Wide Fund for Nature, Gland.
HYYPPA, J.; HYYPPA, H.; INKINEN, M.; ENGDAHL, M.; LINKO, S.; ZHU, Y. 2000. Accuracy comparison of various remote sensing data sources in the retrieval of forest stand attributes. Forest Ecology and Management, 128(1-2): 109-120.
INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais), 2007. Projeto PRODES: monitoramento da floresta amazônica brasileira por satélite. Disponível em: http://www.obt.inpe.br/prodes/. Acesso em: 18 abr. 2010.
LONGHI, R. A. Livro das árvores e arvoretas do Sul. Ed. L & PM, 1995; 167 p.
MARENZI, R. C. A Influência da Vegetação nas Preferências Paisagísticas no Municípioda Penha. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE BOTÂNICA, 50, 1999, p. 150.
MEDEIROS, J.de D. et. al. A vegetação o Parque Florestal do Rio Vermelho. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE BOTÂNICA, 50, 1999, Blumenau/SC. Programa e resumos... Blumenau: Soc. Bot. Br., 1999. P. 150
ROCHA, E. A. e AGRA, M. e F. Cactaceae Medicinais a Paraíba, Brasil. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE BOTÂNICA, 49, 1998, Salvador/BA. Resumos... Salvador: Soc. Brot. Br., 1998, p. 285.
ROCHA, Y. T. e CAVALHEIRO, F. Aspectos históricos do Jardim Botânico. Revista Brasileira de Botânica. RORIGUES, R. R.; GANDOLFI, S. Recomposição de florestas nativas: princípios gerais e subsídios para uma definição metodológica. Revista brasileira de Horticultura Ornamental, Campinas, c. 2, n. 1, p. 4-15, 1996.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
