Conscientização Ambiental com alunos da Educação Infantil da Escola de Ensino Fundamental Kinderwelt de Agudo - RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613084642Keywords:
Environmental Education, Infantile Education, Environmental AwarenessAbstract
This work aims to become the pupils of the Infantile Education more awareness environmentally,considering that this is the first stage of the school education. The research will expose theviability of implanting the Environmental Education in the Infantile Education, attending theinterest of the children in relation to these environmental subjects. For this were providedpractical and didactical activities about the environmental problems mainly about the garbagethat affects people’s life to develop the idea of this study. However, there was achieved abibliographic research of qualitative nature, it is exploratory developed during the months ofAugust to October of 2011. The research was developed in the Elementary School Kinderwelt, inthe city of Agudo, RS. The aim public of the research was the pupils of Maternal and of Pre-school,about 29 children, with the age from two to six years. Old the themes approached had greatrelevancy in children’s learning that resulted in a good development of the activities. Theconclusion of this study demonstrated that the Environmental Education can be developed inInfantile Education, because the children are always disposed to new knowledge, information and reflection about the subjects related to the Environmental Education, with these exposes thechildren will become more awareness and attentive to all what happens around them.
Downloads
References
BASSEDAS, E.; HUGUET, T. & SOLÉ, I. Aprender e ensinar na Educação Infantil. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas Sul, 1999.
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, 1988.
BRASIL. Estatuto da Criança e do Adolescente. Brasília, 1990.
BRASIL. Lei de Diretrizes e Base da Educação Nacional. Brasília, 1996.
BRASIL. Ministério da Educação e do Desporto. Secretaria da educação Fundamental. Referencial Curricular Nacional para a Educação Infantil, v. 3, Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1998.
ELALI, G. A. O ambiente da escola – o ambiente na escola: uma discussão sobre a relação – natureza em educação infantil. Estudos de Psicologia, Natal, p. 309 – 319, 8(2), 2003. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/epsic/v8n2/19047.pdf. Acesso em: 06 out. 2011.
GUATTARI, F. As três ecologias. 21. Ed. Campinas: Papirus, 1990.
GUIMARÃES, M. A dimensão ambiental na educação. 10. Ed. Campinas: Papirus, 1995.
JANKE, N.; TOZONI-REIS, M. F. de C. Produção coletiva de conhecimentos sobre qualidade de vida: por uma educação ambiental participativa e emancipatória. Ciência e Educação, São Paulo, v. 14, n.1, p. 147–157, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ciedu/v14n1/10.pdf. Acesso em: 6 out. 2011.
NOAL, F. O.; BARCELOS, V. H. de L. Educação ambiental e cidadania: cenários brasileiros. Santa Cruz do Sul: EDUNISC, 2003.
RIBEIRO, M. de S. L.; PROFETA, A. C. N. A. Programas de Educação Ambiental no ensino infantil em Palmeiras de Goiás: novos paradigmas para uma sociedade responsável. Revista Eletrônica do Mestrado em Educação Ambiental, Goiânia, v. 13, jul. – dez, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.remea.furg.br/edicoes/vol13/art8.pdf. Acesso em: 9 out. 2011.
SCARDUA,V. M. Educação Infantil, Educação Ambiental e Educação em Valores: uma proposta de desenvolvimento moral da criança em relação às questões ambientais. Vilha Velha, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.facevv.edu.br/Revista/04/valeriamota.pdf. Acesso em: 6 out. 2011.
SCHÜNEMANN, D. da R. Uma proposta pedagógica de conscientização ambiental na Educação Infantil. 2010. 53f. Monografia (Especialização em Educação Ambiental) – Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
