Práticas ambientais e melhoria da qualidade de vida dos catadores da Vila Maringá em Santa Maria, RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613082767Keywords:
Environmental Actions, Social Vulnerability, ConscientizationAbstract
This paper, which is a result of the monograph entitled “Environmental practices andimprovement the quality of life of trash pickers from Maringá village in Santa Maria,RS”, was developed in this village marked by socio-environmental degradation, whereseveral trash pickers walk long distances to try, through their work, to support theirfamilies. Although their work is beneficial to the environment, they are not aware ofcaring for this environment, they are exposed to vulnerability. First, we developed anexploratory phase with visits to the trash pickers and approaches in the socioenvironmentalreality of the village in order to know their problems and to offer andimplement environmental actions. Therefore, we aimed to sensitize and raiseawareness of people through Environmental Education in which, through a new visionand changing attitudes, we aimed to teach how to care for environment, having as abasis their habitat, where we worked on themes in an interdisciplinary and holisticway. In the quantitative analysis, we observed drastic changes of values and love forlife in all dimensions. We verified then excellent results, such as: confidence, adhesion,responsibility, autonomy, self-esteem, interest and motivation.Downloads
References
ARRUDA, José Jobson de Andrade. A Revolução Industrial. 3. ed. São Paulo: Ática, 1994.
DIAS, Genebaldo Freire. Educação Ambiental: princípios e práticas. 7. ed. São Paulo, SP: Gaia, 2001.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia do oprimido. 28. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1987.
LEFF, Enrique. Saber Ambiental: sustentabilidade, racionalidade, complexidade, poder. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2009.
NOGUERA, Jorge Orlando Cuéllar. Curso de Pós-graduação: Especialização em Educação Ambiental. Disponível em: http://www.ufsm.br/educacaoambiental/. Acesso em: 2 de junho de 2010.
PELIZZOLI, Marcelo Luiz. O eu e a diferença Husserl e Heidegger. Porto Alegre, RS: Edipucrs, 2002.
VALLE, Cyro Eyer do; LAGE, Henrique. Meio ambiente: acidentes, lições, soluções. São Paulo, SP: SENAC, 2003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
