Interdisciplinary approach and transversal themes uses in geography: a learning strategy

Authors

  • Jucemeire Borges Soares da Silva Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS
  • Luciana Borba Benetti Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820642

Keywords:

Interdisciplinary approach, Environment, Geography, Theme projects

Abstract

Interdisciplinary approach means exchanging reciprocity and intensity among different school subjects allowing students to get a wider comprehension and understanding of situations and problems, overcoming the fragmentation of the knowledge. This article deals with the transversal theme Environment in the subject of Geography, which was developed at Escola Estadual de Ensino Fundamental Dr Pery da Cunha Gonçalves, located in São Gabriel/ RS, 6º grade, class A. The following themes were studied: garbage separation, selective collection of the garbage, pollution, reasonable use of water. The methodology used was doing projects to help students understand all the multiple aspects of their reality, showing them that a sustainable approach is possible and this way the learning process becomes more significant as it was demonstrated by the evaluation process results that were compared to the group which was not part of the research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Jucemeire Borges Soares da Silva, Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS

Possui graduação em Pedagogia pela Universidade Luterana do Brasil e graduação em Estudos Sociais pela Universidade da Região da Campanha.

Luciana Borba Benetti, Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS

Possui graduação em Ciências Biológicas pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, mestrado em Engenharia Ambiental pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina e doutorado em Engenharia Ambiental pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Professora Associado I da Universidade Federal do Pampa, UNIPAMPA/Campus São Gabriel. 

References

AULER, D. Enfoque ciência-tecnologia-sociedade: pressupostos para o contexto brasileiro. Ciência & Ensino. v. 1, p. 1-20, 2007.

BRASIL. Parâmetros curriculares nacionais: Temas Transversais. Brasília: MEC/SEB, 1998b.

BRASIL. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: meio ambiente e saúde/temas transversais. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília: MEC/SEF, V.9, 1997.

FAZENDA, I. C. A. (Org.) Práticas interdisciplinares na escola. São Paulo: Cortez, 2011. p.65-78.

FAZENDA. Ivani. Integração e Interdisciplinaridade no Ensino Brasileiro: Efetividade ou ideologia? São Paulo: Loyola, 1992.

FAZENDA, Ivani et al. (Org.). Práticas Interdisciplinares na escola. 3. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 1996.

FREITAS, K. S. Equipamentos e materiais didáticos. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília, 2007. Disponível em: htpp://portal.mec.gov.br/seb/arquivos/pdf/profunc/equip_mat_dit .pdf. Acesso em: 23/07/2015

GIL, Antônio Carlos. Como elaborar Projetos de Pesquisa. 3 ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1991.

JAPIASSU, Hilton. Interdisciplinaridade e patologia do saber. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1976.

LEITE, L. H. A. Pedagogia de projetos: Intervenção no presente. Presença pedagógica. 1996. n.8. p. 24-33.

MORIM, E. Os sete saberes necessários à educação do futuro. 5. ed. São Paulo: Cortez; Brasília, D.F.: UNESCO 2002.

NOGUEIRA, N. R. Pedagogia dos projetos: uma jornada interdisciplinar rumo ao desenvolvimento das múltiplas inteligências. São Paulo: Érica, 2001.

OLIVEIRA, M.A.F.C.; BUENO, S.M.V. Comunicação educativa do enfermeiro na promoção da saúde sexual escolar. Ver. Latino-Am. Enfermagem, Ribeirão Preto, v.5 m.3 p. 71,81, 1997.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-07

How to Cite

Silva, J. B. S. da, & Benetti, L. B. (2015). Interdisciplinary approach and transversal themes uses in geography: a learning strategy. Monografias Ambientais, 14, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820642

Issue

REMOA, V.14, 2015, ESPECIAL EDITION: PÓS GRADUAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO: INTERDISCIPLINARIDADE E TRANSVERSALIDADE – UNIPAMPA – CAMPUS DE SÃO GABRIEL – RS

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.