Rural feasts: media, festive dimension and social impact in two small communities in state of Rio Grande do Sul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130816935Keywords:
Community events, Through media, FarmersAbstract
The work aims to analyze both rural festivities that take place in the cities of Sao Sepe and Rascal / RS, giving a focus on media means used and the extent that these parties bring to the regions. Community festivals that take place in these contexts reveal, for example, a form of collective effort that remains alive, showing the organization of the community. Regarding the festive meal is the quality of food served beautifully and sick way, that express the consideration for the guests. The food is a factor which brings together, in so far as the party gives rise to eating and drinking, presenting thus socializing character of the food. These community parties involve periods prior preparation, in which members of the community boards meet - are also part of this process spouses and often (the) daughters (the). Participation in party preparation does not constitute a remunerated activity, all farmers work for free, by the community. Aiming to achieve the party’s goals, either as disclosure of paper as is the case of the two events analyzed, or local income only.Downloads
References
BEZERRA, Amélia Cristina Alves. Festa e cidade: entrelaçamentos e proximidades. In: Espaço e cultura, UERJ, RJ, n. 23, p. 7-18, jan./jun. de 2008.
CAMPANHOLA, C.; GRAZIANO DA SILVA, J. Panorama do turismo no espaço rural brasileiro: nova oportunidade para o pequeno agricultor. Disponível em Acesso em 20 out 2008. s/p.
CARVALHO, J. A. de S. (org). Festas rurais. Londrina, 2008. Trabalho não-publicado.
CESCA, Cleuza Gertrude Gimenes. Organização de eventos. São Paulo: Summus, 1997.
FERREIRA, M. N. Comunicação, resistência e cidadania: as festas populares. In: Comunicação e Política, v. 24, n. 2, p. 61-71, 2006.
HENRIQUES, M. S. (org). Comunicação e Estratégia de Mobilização Social. Gênesis- Fundação Educacional e Cultural. Gráfica e Editora Dom Bosco. Belo Horizonte, MG. 2009.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (BR). Censo Demigráfico 2012. Acesso em 13 de janeiro 2015. Disponível em: http://www.censo2010.ibge.gov.br/index.php.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (BR). Censo Demográfico 2010. Acesso em 24 de janeiro de 2015. Disponível em: http://www.cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/temas.php?lang=&codmun=431960&idtema=90search=rio-grande-so-sul|sao-sepe|censo-demografico-2010:-resultados-da-amostra-caracteristicas-da-populaçao
KUNSCH, Margarida Maria Krohling. Planejamento de relações públicas na comunicação integrada. São Paulo: Summus, 2003.
MAFRA, R. Entre o espetáculo, a festa e a argumentação: mídia, comunicação estratégica e mobilização social. Belo Horizonte. Autêntica, 192p. 2006.
SANTOS, K. C. O. Estudos dos conceitos fundamentais da teoria da mídia de Harry pross: uma teoria dos multi meios. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, São Paulo. 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
