Management systems by performance indicators of higher education institutions: proposal of a model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465944512Keywords:
Educational Institutions. Performance indicators. Organizational performance.Abstract
Purpose – This research aims to recognize the performance indicators relating to the management of species reported in the literature.
Design/methodology/approach – It is an exploratory and descriptive research. It assumes the qualitative characteristics. We presented a theoretical proposal of indicators and sufficient dimensions to manage an IES. The board was selected by convenience. The expert group was composed of people who have expertise in managing performance.
Findings – We found indicators that were added according to the suggestion of the respondents, resulting in 65 indicators, divided into 9 dimensions. The model contemplates the dimensions: Economic; Internationalization and research; Student/Client; Market; Academia; Operational; Human Resources; Society/extension and Sustainability.
Research limitations/implications – As limitations of the research, there is the possibility of some work on indicators that have not been identified at this stage of research, and also the choice of specialists.
Practical implications – This study presents the determinants of business performance. The indicators that should be used for each type of organization are of utmost importance and were highlighted as one of the challenges of future research in the management of organizational performance.
Social implications – In the Brazilian literature, 75% of the surveys do not address performance management holistically, thus reinforcing this study's importance and originality.
Originality/value – Previous literature were identified 57 performance indicators, distributed in six 6 dimensions based on the concepts of multidimensionality. The work found indicators were added according to the suggestion of the interviewees, resulting in 65 indicators divided into 9 dimensions.
Downloads
References
Ball, R., & Halwachi, J. (1987). Performance indicators in higher education. Higher Education, 16(4), 393-405.
Ball, R., & Wilkinson, R. (1994). The use and abuse of performance indicators in UK higher education. Higher Education, 27(4), 417-427.
Bititci, U. S., Turner, T., & Begemann, C. (2000). Dynamics of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(6), 692-704.
Bourne, M., Neely, A., Mills, J., & Platts, K. (2003). Implementing performance measurement systems: a literature review. Int. Journal of Business Performance Management, 5(1), 1-24.
Callado, A. L. C., Callado, A. A. C., & Almeida, M. A. (2007). A utilização de indicadores gerenciais de desempenho industrial no âmbito de agroindústrias. Revista Eletrônica Sistemas & Gestão, 2(2), 102-118.
Carneiro da Cunha, Julio A., & Corrêa, H. L. (2013). Avaliação de desempenho organizacional: um estudo aplicado em hospitais filantrópicos. Rae - Revista de administração de empresas, 53(5), 485-499.
Chen, S. H., Yang, C.-C., & Shiau, J.-Y. (2006). The application of Balanced Scorecard in the performance evaluation of higher education. The Tqm Magazine, 18(2), 190-205.
Chen, S. H., Wang, H. H., & Yang, K. J. (2009). Establishment and application of performance measure indicators for universities. The TQM Journal, 21(3), 220-235.
Corrêa, H. L., & Hourneaux Jr, F. (2008). Sistemas de mensuração e avaliação de desempenho organizacional: estudo de casos no setor químico no Brasil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, (19), 50-64.
Crispim, S., & Lugoboni, L. F. (2012). Avaliação de desempenho organizacional: análise comparativa dos modelos teóricos e pesquisa de aplicação nas instituições de ensino superior da região metropolitana de São Paulo. Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gestão, 11(1), 41-54.
Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1998). Capital intelectual: descobrindo o valor real de sua empresa pela identificação de seus valores internos. São Paulo: Makron Books do Brasil.
Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: an extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20, 263-282.
Ganesan, E., & Paturi, R. (2009). Key performance indicators framework: a method to track business objectives, link business strategy to processes and detail importance of key performance indicators in enterprise business architecture. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, 736.
Ghalayini, A. M., & Noble, J. S. (1996). The changing basis of performance measurement. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(8), 63-80.
Gil, A. C. (2010). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (5a ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Halachmi, A. (2005). Performance measurement is only one way of managing performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(7), 502-516.
Hourneaux Jr., F. (2005). Avaliação de desempenho organizacional: estudo de casos de empresas do setor químico. (Dissertação de Mestrado em Administração de Empresas). Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade da Universidade de São Paulo (FEA-USP). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R., & Aouad, G. (2001). Performance management in construction: a conceptual framework. Construction Management and Economics, 19(1), 85-95.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1993). Putting the Balanced Scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 66, 134-142.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). Organização orientada para a estratégia: como as empresas que adotam o balanced scorecard prosperam no novo ambiente de negócios. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2006). Alinhamento. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.
Kennerley, M. P., & Neely, A. D. (2002). A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(11), 1222-1245.
Lynch, R. L., & Cross, K. F. (1990). Managing the corporate warriors. Quality Progress, 23(4), 54-59.
Nascimento, S. Bortoluzzi, S. C., Dutra, A., & Ensslin, S. R. (2011). Mapeamento dos indicadores de desempenho organizacional em pesquisas da área de administração, ciências contábeis e turismo no período de 2000 a 2008. R. Adm, 46(4), 373-391.
Neely, A. (1999). The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(2), 205-228.
Neely, A., Adams, C., & Crowe, P. (2001). The performance prism in practice. Measuring business excellence, 5(2), 6-13.
Neely, A., Richards, H., Mills, J., Platts, K., & Bourne, M. (1997). Designing performance measures: a structured approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(11), 1131-1152.
Nørreklit, H. (2000). The balance on the Balanced Scorecard: a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 65-88.
Paixão, R. B., Bruni, A. L., Becker, J. L., & Tenório, R. M. (2014). Avaliação de mestrados profissionais: construção e análise de indicadores à luz da multidimensionalidade. Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, 22(83), 505-532.
Richmond, B. (1997). The Strategic Forum: aligning objectives, strategy and process. System Dynamics Review, 13(2), 131-148.
Shahin, A., & Mahbod, M. A. (2007). Prioritization of key performance indicators: an integration of analytical hierarchy process and goal setting. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(3), 226-240.
Suwignjo, P., Bititci, U. S., & Carrie, A. S. (2000) Quantitative models for performance measurement system. International Journal Production Economics, 64, 231-241.
Vergara, S. C. (2012). Métodos de pesquisa em administração. São Paulo: Atlas.
Waal, A., & Chachage, B. (2011). Applicability of the high-performance organization framework at an east African university: the case of Iringa University College. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 6(2), 148-167.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de Administração da UFSM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal remains the copyright holders of articles published. In order to be published, authors must sign the Copyrights Letter, which is sent to the authors by e-mail, thus granting rights, including on translation, to ReA/UFSM. The journal grants third parties the right to use, reproduce, and share the article according to the Creative Commons license agreement (CC-BY 4.0), as stated in the article’s PDF documents.
