KTT strategies for scientific institutions: understanding the past to help build the future

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465965312

Keywords:

Knowledge and Technology Transfer, Strategies, Systematic Literature Review, Knowledge Dissemination, Scientific Institutions.

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to identify the current situation of the research that analyzes KTT strategies in scientific institutions.

Design/methodology/approach – To systematize the empirical evidence that emerged from academic debates in the field, the study breaks down, through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), 42 papers from the Web of Science database. The author divides the sample into three clusters: environmental impact, institutional effectiveness, and individual strategies, according to its unit of analysis.

Findings – The findings indicate that the alignment of KTT activities with the strategic objectives of the institutions is fundamental for positive outcomes. In addition to that, the resources for obtaining relevant results are the quality and the availability of human capital in scientific institutions, public companies, and support organizations. Finally, there is a stream of research that criticizes the exclusively commercial approach of the phenomenon.

Research limitations – The Web of Science database relies on being the manly coverage for scientific publications in general. So, due to the choice for composing this sample with papers written only in English, untranslated studies were excluded from this analysis.

Originality/value – The contribution for Literature relies on proposing a future research agenda based on identified gaps and current topics, discussing the results of previous studies that can support the decision-making of these organizations at developing efficient KTT strategies for themselves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Matheus Dantas Madeira Pontes, Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia Afro-BrasileiraUniversidade da Beira Interior

Doutorando em Gestão pela Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. Economista da Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira, Redenção, Brasil

Thayanne Lima Duarte Pontes, Universidade da Beira Interior

Doutoranda em Gestão pela Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. Mestra em Administração pela Universidade Potiguar, Natal, Brasil. Correio eletrônico: thayanne.pontes@ubi.pt

References

Agrawal, A. (2006). Engaging the inventor: Exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge. Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 63-79.

Andersen, B., & Rossi, F. (2011). UK universities look beyond the patent policy discourse in their intellectual property strategies. Science and Public Policy, 38(4), 254-268.

Aragonés-Beltrán, P., Poveda-Bautista, R., & Jiménez-Sáez, F. (2017). An in-depth analysis of a TTO's objectives alignment within the university strategy: An ANP-based approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 44, 19-43.

Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2008). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37(10), 1865-1883.

Arvanitis, S., & Woerter, M. (2009). Firms’ transfer strategies with universities and the relationship with firms’ innovation performance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1067-1106.

Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Wright, M. (2014). Technology transfer in a global economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 301-312.

Autant-Bernard, C. (2001). Science and knowledge flows: evidence from the French case. Research Policy, 30(7), 1069-1078. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00131-1.

Battistella, C., De Toni, A. F., & Pillon, R. (2016). Inter-organisational technology/knowledge transfer: a framework from critical literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(5), 1195-1234.

Bengtsson, L. (2017). A comparison of university technology transfer offices’ commercialization strategies in the Scandinavian countries. Science and Public Policy, 44(4), 565-577.

Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Gil-Doménech, D., & Eva, M. (2020). Examining strategies behind universities’ technology transfer portfolio: how different patterns of resource consumption can lead to similar technology transfer profiles. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal.

Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entpreprenerial universities and technology transfer: A conceptual framework for understanding knowledge-based economic development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175-188.

Bergenholtz, C., & Bjerregaard, T. (2014). How institutional conditions impact university–industry search strategies and networks. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(3), 253-266.

Bou‐Llusar, J. C., & Segarra‐Ciprés, M. (2006). Strategic knowledge transfer and its implications for competitive advantage: an integrative conceptual framework. Journal of knowledge management.

Breznitz, S. M., O'Shea, R. P., & Allen, T. J. (2008). University commercialization strategies in the development of regional bioclusters. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 129-142.

Carayannis, E. G., Alexander, J., & Ioannidis, A. (2000). Leveraging knowledge, learning, and innovation in forming strategic government–university–industry (GUI) R&D partnerships in the US, Germany, and France. Technovation, 20(9), 477-488.

Chandran, V. G. R., Hayter, C. S., & Strong, D. R. (2015). Personal strategic alliances: enhancing the scientific and technological contributions of university faculty in Malaysia. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 24(5), 421-435.

Charles, D., Kitagawa, F., & Uyarra, E. (2014). Universities in crisis?—new challenges and strategies in two English city-regions. Cambridge journal of regions, economy and society, 7(2), 327-348.

Cottrill, C. A., Rogers, E. M., & Mills, T. (1989). Co-citation analysis of the scientific literature of innovation research traditions: Diffusion of innovations and technology transfer. Knowledge, 11(2), 181-208.

Curi, C., Daraio, C., & Llerena, P. (2012). University technology transfer: how (in) efficient are French universities?. Cambridge journal of economics, 36(3), 629-654.

De Moortel, K., & Crispeels, T. (2018). International university-university technology transfer: Strategic management framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 145-155.

Deiaco, E., Hughes, A., & McKelvey, M. (2012). Universities as strategic actors in the knowledge economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(3), 525-541.

Diniz, D. M., & de Castro, J. M. (2010). Processo de gestão estratégica em universidades privadas: Um estudo de casos. Revista de Administração da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 3(3), 311-325.

Eloranta, V., & Turunen, T. (2015). Seeking competitive advantage with service infusion: a systematic literature review. Journal of Service Management.

Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Anatomy of the entrepreneurial university. Social Science Information, 52(3), 486-511.

Feldman, M., Feller, I., Bercovitz, J., & Burton, R. (2002). Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities. Management Science, 48(1), 105-121.

Friedman, J., & Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter?. The Journal of technology transfer, 28(1), 17-30.

Frølund, L., Murray, F., & Riedel, M. (2018). Developing successful strategic partnerships with universities. MIT Sloan management review, 59(2), 71-79.

Giuri, P., Munari, F., Scandura, A., & Toschi, L. (2019). The strategic orientation of universities in knowledge transfer activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 261-278.

Giusepponi, K., & Tavoletti, E. (2018). Vision and Mission Statments in Italian Universities: Results of Empirical Investigation on Strategic Orientation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(1), 301-328. doi: 10.1007/s13132-015-0343-7.

Govind, M., & Küttim, M. (2017). International knowledge transfer from university to industry: A systematic literature review. Research in economics and business: central and eastern europe, 8(2).

Guerrero, M., Herrera, F., & Urbano, D. (2019). Strategic knowledge management within subsidised entrepreneurial university-industry partnerships. Management Decision.

Hadengue, M., de Marcellis-Warin, N., & Warin, T. (2017). Reverse innovation: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Emerging Markets.

Hall, J. C. (2006). Positive Externalities and Government Involvement in Education. Journal of Private Enterprise, 21(2), 165-175.

Hausberg, J. P., & Korreck, S. (2020). Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 151-176.

Hazlett, J. A., & Carayannis, E. G. (1998). Business-university virtual teaming for strategic planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 57(3), 261-265.

Helfat, C.E. & Peteraf, M.A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles, Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010.

Horner, S., Jayawarna, D., Giordano, B., & Jones, O. (2019). Strategic choice in universities: Managerial agency and effective technology transfer. Research Policy, 48(5), 1297-1309.

Hughes, A., & Kitson, M. (2012). Pathways to impact and the strategic role of universities: new evidence on the breadth and depth of university knowledge exchange in the UK and the factors constraining its development. Cambridge journal of economics, 36(3), 723-750.

Keupp, M. M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2012). The strategic management of innovation: A systematic review and paths for future research. International journal of management reviews, 14(4), 367-390.

Kirs, M., Karo, E., & Lumi, P. (2017). Strategic behaviour of research groups within the entrepreneurial university policy rhetoric: the Estonian biotechnology sector. Science and Public Policy, 44(6), 802-820.

Klofsten, M., Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Mian, S., Urbano, D., & Wright, M. The entrepreneurial university as driver for economic growth and social change – Key strategic challenges. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 141, 149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.004.

Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1023-1042.

Kraus, S., Mahto, R. V., & Walsh, S. T. (2021). The importance of literature reviews in small business and entrepreneurship research.

Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities: Toward a Renewed Categorization of University Activities? Higher Education Policy, 20, 441-456. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300169.

Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: an extension of theresource-based view, Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638-658.

Lee, K. J. (2018). Strategic human resource management for university-industry collaborations in Korea: financial incentives for academic faculty and employment security of industry liaison offices. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(4), 461-472.

Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology transfer and universities' spin-out strategies. Small business economics, 20(2), 185-200.

Lubik, S., Garnsey, E., Minshall, T., & Platts, K. (2013). Value creation from the innovation environment: partnership strategies in university spin‐outs. R&D Management, 43(2), 136-150.

Major, E. (2003). Technology transfer and innovation initiatives in strategic management: generating an alternative perspective. Industry and Higher Education, 17(1), 21-27.

Malerba, R. C., & Ferreira, J. J. (2020). Immigrant entrepreneurship and strategy: a systematic literature review. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 1-35.

Mascarenhas, C., Ferreira, J. J., & Marques, C. (2018). University–industry cooperation: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Science and Public Policy, 45(5), 708-718.

Mavi, R. K., Gheibdoust, H., Khanfar, A. A., & Mavi, N. K. (2019). Ranking factors influencing strategic management of university business incubators with ANP. Management Decision.

McCarthy, I. P., Silvestre, B. S., von Nordenflycht, A., & Breznitz, S. M. (2018). A typology of university research park strategies: What parks do and why it matters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 47, 110-122.

Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., & Chen, M. -J. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 935-955. doi: 10.1002/smj.615.

Özel, S. Ö., & Pénin, J. (2016). Exclusive or open? An economic analysis of university intellectual property patenting and licensing strategies. Journal of Innovation Economics Management, (3), 133-153.

Paranhos, J., Perin, F. S., Mercadante, E., & Soares, C. (2019). Industry-university interaction strategies of large Brazilian pharmaceutical companies. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management.

Paton, S., Chia, R., & Burt, G. (2014). Relevance or ‘relevate’? How university business schools can add value through reflexively learning from strategic partnerships with business. Management Learning, 45(3), 267-288.

Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. (2009). Strategic entrepreneurship at universities: Academic entrepreneurs’ assessment of policy programs. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 33(1), 319-340.

Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.

Pickernell, D., Ishizaka, A., Huang, S., & Senyard, J. (2019). Entrepreneurial university strategies in the UK context: towards a research agenda. Management Decision.

Pitsakis, K., & Giachetti, C. (2020). Information-based imitation of university commercialization strategies: The role of technology transfer office autonomy, age, and membership into an association. Strategic Organization, 18(4), 573-616.

Robertson, J., McCarthy, I. P., & Pitt, L. (2019). Leveraging social capital in university-industry knowledge transfer strategies: A comparative positioning framework. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(4), 461-472.

Sandelin, B., & Sarafoglou, N. (2004). Language and scientific publication statistics. Language Problems and Language Planning, 28(1), 1-10.

Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2001). Corporate strategic objectives for establishing relationships with university research centers. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(2), 157-163.

Schaffer, R. H. (2012). Nonprofit and university strategic partnerships to strengthen the sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(1), 105-119.

Scott, N. R. (1998). Strategy for activating university research. Technological forecasting and social change, 57(3), 217-219.

Sharif, N., & Tang, H. H. H. (2014). New trends in innovation strategy at Chinese universities in Hong Kong and Shenzhen. International Journal of Technology Management, 65(1-4), 300-318.

Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford review of economic policy, 23(4), 640-660.

Soetanto, D., & Jack, S. (2016). The impact of university-based incubation support on the innovation strategy of academic spin-offs. Technovation, 50, 25-40.

Somsuk, N., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2014). A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: Resource-based view. Technological forecasting and social change, 85, 198-210.

Sousa, D., de Brito, M. J., & Zambalde, A. L. (2019). Marketing roles of university technology transfer offices: a systematic review. Revista de Administração da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 12(1), 26-40.

Szopa, A. (Ed.). (2015). Competitive Strategies for Academic Entrepreneurship: Commercialization of Research-Based Products: Commercialization of Research-Based Products. IGI Global.

Tatikonda, M. V., & Stock, G. N. (2003). Product technology transfer in the upstream supply chain. Journal of product innovation management, 20(6), 444-467.

Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28 No. 13, 1319-1350.

Van den Berghe, L., & Guild, P. D. (2008). The strategic value of new university technology and its impact on exclusivity of licensing transactions: An empirical study. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 91-103.

Vieira, E., & Gomes, J. (2009). A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university. Scientometrics, 81(2), 587-600.

Weber, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quartely, 26(2), 13-23.

Wright, M., Clarysse, B., & Mosey, S. (2012). Strategic entrepreneurship, resource orchestration and growing spin-offs from universities. Technology analysis & strategic management, 24(9), 911-927.

Wu, W., & Zhou, Y. (2012). The third mission stalled? Universities in China’s technological progress. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 812-827. doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9233-8.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Pontes, M. D. M., & Pontes, T. L. D. . (2021). KTT strategies for scientific institutions: understanding the past to help build the future. Revista De Administração Da UFSM, 14, 1300–1324. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465965312