Imitação ou colaboração? Marlowe e o cânone shakespeareano inicial

Autores

  • Gary Taylor Florida State University
  • John V. Nance Florida State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2176148564672

Palavras-chave:

Christopher Marlowe, Imitação, Autoria, Henrique VI Parte I

Resumo

Este artigo emprega estudos de atribuição de autoria para propor que é possível
distinguir um dramaturgo trabalhando conjuntamente com outro (em colaboração) de um que emprega recursos linguísticos reconhecíveis de outro poeta (imitação). Partindo do pressuposto de que a identidade é celular e sistêmica enquanto a imitação é seletiva e semiótica, verifica-se três trechos de Henrique VI Parte I, na qual William Shakespeare e Christopher Marlowe trabalharam colaborativamente.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Gary Taylor, Florida State University

GARY TAYLOR, Department Chair, Dahl and Lottie Pryor Professor in Shakespearean Literature, Ph.D., Cambridge, is General Editor of the New Oxford Shakespeare, including Complete Works: Modern Critical Edition (2016), Complete Works: Critical Reference Edition (2017), and Authorship Companion (2017). He was also general editor of the Collected Works of "our other Shakespeare," Thomas Middleton (Oxford, 2008), which won the Modern Language Association's biennial prize for a Distinguished Scholarly edition and the Emily Dietz award for outstanding publication in early modern studies; he also co-edited The Oxford Handbook of Thomas Middleton (2012), the largest collection of new critical essays on Middleton ever published. The "Middleton Trilogy" is now available in paperback. He general-edited two series published by Palgrave, "Signs of Race" and "History of Text Technologies". He founded the interdisciplinary History of Text Technologies program at FSU, and has written about the practice and theory of editing in various periods and genres; in 2006 he gave the McKenzie lectures at Oxford University on Edward Blount, the chief publisher of the 1623 Shakespeare folio. Taylor's Moment by Moment by Shakespeare (MacMillan, 1985) was the winner of a Choice Award for "Outstanding Academic Book." His other books include a history of Shakespeare's reputation (Reinventing Shakespeare, 1989: "the most ambitious book on Shakespeare ever written", according to a review in Shakespeare Quarterly), a theory of artistic reputations generally (Cultural Selection, 1996: "brilliant insights and beautifully reasoned prose… an original and striking analysis of culture", according to the New York Times Book Review), and "an abbreviated history of Western manhood" (Castration, 2000: "terrific reading," according to Salon.com). He co-edited the first collection of essays on Shakespeare and Fletcher's partially-lost play The History of Cardenio (Oxford, 2012), and the same year his "creative reconstruction" of Cardenio was performed in Indianapolis, where it was also the subject of an international scholarly colloquium, a PBS documentary, and another collection of scholarly essays (Palgrave, 2013). His play has most recently been performed by the Richmond Shakespeare Society (2017). Taylor has also worked to communicate contemporary literary theory and criticism to a mass audience (newspapers, radio, TV, museums and theatres in North America and UK, including three Platforms at the Royal National Theatre, London). He was widely interviewed in 2016 in connection with the New Oxford Shakespeare's identification of Christopher Marlowe as Shakespeare's collaborator on the three Henry VI plays.

Referências

ABUTALEBI, Jubin and GREEN, David. ‘Bilingual language produc-tion: the neurocognition of language representation and control’, Journal of Neurolinguistics, vol. 20, 242–75, May 2007.

AUBREY, John. Brief Lives. Ed. John Buchanan-Brown. New York: Penguin, 2000.

BATE, Jonathan (Ed.); SHAKESPEARE, William. Titus Andronicus. New Arden Shakespeare Third Series. London: Bloomsbury, 1995.

BATE, Jonathan and RASMUSSEN, Eric (Eds.), The RSC Shakespeare: The Complete Works. London: Macmillan,2007.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1984.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. The field of Cultural Production.New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.

BRADBROOK, M. C. ‘Shakespeare’s recollections of Marlowe’, in Shakespeare’s Styles, In EDWARDS, Philip et al. Shakespeare’s Styles: essays in Honour of Kenneth Muir. Cambridge: CUP, 1980.

BROOKE, Nicholas. ‘Marlowe as Provocative Agent in Shakespeare’s Early Plays’, Shakespeare Survey, vol.14, p. 34-44, 1961.

BURROWS, J. F. and CRAIG, D. H. ‘Lyrical Drama and the Turgid Mountebanks: Styles of Dialog in Romantic and Renaissance Tragedy’, Computers and the Humanities, vol. 28, p. 63-86, 1994.

BURROWS, John ‘Who Wrote Shamela? Verifying the Authorship of a Pa-rodic Text’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 20, p. 437-50, 2005.

BURROWS, John. ‘A Second Opinion on “Shakespeare and Authorship Studies in the Twenty-First Century”’. Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 63 , p. 355–92, 2012.

CHARNEY, Maurice. ‘The Voice of Marlowe’s Tamburlaine in Early Shakespeare’, Comparative Drama, vol. 31, 1997.

CHERNAIK, Warren ‘Shakespeare as Co-Author: The Case of 1 Henry VI’, Medieval and Renaissance Drama in england, vol. 27, p. 192–220, 2014.

CLARE, Janet. Shakespeare’s Stage Traffic: Imitation, Borrowing and Competition in Renaissance Theatre. Cambridge, CUP, 2014.

CLEMEN, W. C. english Tragedy Before Shakespeare: The Develo-pment of Dramatic Speech, trans. T. S. Dorsch. London, 1961.

COLDIRON, A. E. B. ‘Cultural Amphibians’. Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature, vol. 51, p. 45-58, 2003–4.

COLDIRON, A. E. B. Printers without Borders: Translation and Textuality in the Renaissance. Cambridge: CUP, 2015.

CRAIG, Hugh and KINNEY, Arthur F., Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship.Cambridge: CUP, 2009.

CRAIG, Hugh, ‘Authorial Attribution and Computation Stylistics: If You Can Tell Authors Apart, Have You Learned Anything about Them?’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 14 p. 103-13, 1999.

CRAIG, Hugh. ‘Authorship’. In KINNEY, Arthur F. (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare. Oxford: OUP, p. 23-3, 2012.

DICKSON, Vernon Guy. emulation on the Shakespearean Stage. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013.

EGAN, Gabriel. ‘Shakespeare: Editions and Textual Studies’, The Year’s Work in english Studies, 91, p. 328–410, 2012).

ES, Bart van. Shakespeare in Company. Oxford: OUP, 2013.FROW, John. Character and Person. Oxford: OUP, 2014.

GREENE, Thomas The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven: Yale UP, 1982.

HATTAWAY, Michael (Ed.), The first Part of King Henry VI. New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: CUP, 1990.

HOPE, Jonathan. ‘Middletonian Stylistics’, in TAYLOR, Gary and HENLEY, Trish Thomas. The Oxford Handbook of Thomas Midd-leton. Oxford: OUP, 2012, p. 443-72.

HOPE, Jonathan. Shakespeare and Language: Reason, Eloquence and Artifice in the Renaissance.London: Bloomsbury, 2010.

HOPE, Jonathan. The Authorship of Shakespeare’s Plays.Cam-bridge: CUP, 1994.

JACKSON, MacDonald P. Determining the Shakespeare Canon. Oxford: OUP, 2014.

JACKSON, MacDonald. ‘Shakespeare’s Brothers and Peele’s Brethren: Titus Andronicus Again’. Notes and Queries, vol. 242, p. 494-5, 1997.

JACKSON, MacDonald. ‘Stage Directions and Speech Headings in Act 1 of Titus Andronicus Q (1594): Shakespeare or Peele?’, Studies in Bibliography, vol. 49, 134-48, 1996.

KENNY, Anthony. The Computation of Style. Oxford: OUP, 1982.

KIRSCHBAUM, Leo. ‘Some Light on The Jew of Malta’, Modern Language Quarterly, vol. 7, p. 53–6, 1946.

LABOV, William. Principles of Linguistic Change, 2 vols. Oxford, 1994–2001.

LABOV, William. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, 1972.

LABOV, William. The Social Stratification of english in NewYork City. Washington, DC, 1966.

LAKE, David. ‘Three Seventeenth-Century Revisions: Thomas of Woodstock, The Jew of Malta, and Faustus B’. Notes and Queries, vol. 228, p. 133–43, 1983.

LOGAN, Robert A. Shakespeare’s Marlowe: The Influence of Chris-topher Marlowe on Shakespeare’s Artistry. Aldershot, 2007.

MARLOWE, Christopher The Jew of Malta. Ed. N. W. Bawcutt, Revels Plays. Manchester, 1978.

MARLOWE, Christopher. Dido, Queen of Carthage and The Mas-sacre at Paris, ed. H. J. Oliver, Revels Plays. London, 1968.

MERRIAM, Thomas. ‘Faustian Joan’, Notes and Queries, vol. 245, p. 218-20, 2002.

MILLER, Daniel J. et al. ‘Prolonged Myelination in Human Neocortical Evolution’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, p. 16480-5, 2012.

NANCE, John V. ‘Shakespeare, Theobald, and the Prose Problem in Double Falsehood’. In TAYLOR, Gary et BOURUS, Terri. Creation and Re-Creation, New York: Palgrave, 2012, p. 109-24.

PEELE, George. Chronicle of King edward the first.London, 1593.

PEELE, George. The Battle of Alcazar, ed. W. W. Greg, Malone Society. London, 1907.

PEELE, George. The Device of the Pageant. London, 1585.

RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. et al., Phantoms in the Brain: Probing the Mysteries of the Human Mind. New York, 1998.

SAUSSURE Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics, trans. Roy Harris. La Salle: Open Court, 1983.

SHAPIRO, James. Rival Playwrights: Marlowe, Jonson, Shakes-peare.New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.

SHAW, Christopher and MCEACHERN, Jill (Eds.). Toward a Theory of Neuroplasticity. London: Psychology Press, 2001.

SISSON, Charles. ‘Keep the Widow Waking: A Lost Play by Thomas Dekker’, Library, vol. 4, 1927.

STERN, Tiffany. Documents of Performance in early Modern england.Cambridge: CUP, 2009.

TARLINSKAJA, Marina. Shakespeare and the Versification of english Drama, 1561–1642. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.

TARLINSKAYA, Marina. Shakespeare and the Versification of english Drama, 1561-1642. London: Ashgate, 2014.

TARLINSKAYA, Marina. Shakespeare’s Verse: Iambic Pentameter and the Poet’s Idiosyncrasies.New York, 1987.

TAYLOR, Gary ‘A History of The History of Cardenio’. In TAYLOR, Gary et BOURUS, Terri. Creation and Re-Creation, New York: Palgrave, 2012, p. 11–61.

TAYLOR, Gary. ‘Shakespeare and Others: The Authorship of Henry the Sixth, Part One’, Medieval and Renaissance Drama in england, vol. 7, p. 145–205, 1995).

TAYLOR, Gary. ‘Sleight of Mind: Cognitive Illusions and Shakespearian Desire’. In TAYLOR, Gary et BOURUS, Terri (Eds.) The Creation and Re-creation of Cardenio: Performing Shakespeare, Transforming Cervantes. New York: Palgrave, 2013, p. 125-68.

TAYLOR, Gary. ‘Why Did Shakespeare Collaborate?’. Shakespeare Survey, vol. 67, p. 1-17, 2014.

TAYLOR, Gary. “Empirical Middleton: Macbeth, Adaptation, and Mi-croauthorship”. Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 65, n.3, p. 239-272, 2014.

TAYLOR, Gary. “Why Did Shakespeare Collaborate?”. Shakespeare Survey, vol. 67, p. 1-17, 2014.

TURNER, Robert Y. Shakespeare’s Apprenticeship (Chicago, 1974); Clemen, ‘Some aspects of style in the Henry VI plays,’. In EDWARDS, Philip et al. Shakespeare’s Styles: essays in Honour of Kenneth Muir. . Cambridge: CUP, 1980.

VICKERS, Brian. ‘Incomplete Shakespeare; or, Denying Co-Authorship in 1 Henry VI ’. Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 58, p. 311–52, 2007.

VICKERS, Brian. ‘Shakespeare and Authorship Studies in the Twenty--first Century’. Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 62, p. 106-40, 2011.

VICKERS, Brian. Shakespeare Co-Author. Oxford: OUP, 2002.

VINCENT, When ‘harey’ Met Shakespeare: The Genesis of ‘The first Part of Henry the Sixth’. Saarbru ̈cken, 2008.

WEBER, William W. ‘Shakespeare After all? The Authorship of Titus An-dronicus 4.1 Reconsidered’. Shakespeare Survey, vol. 67 p. 69– 84, 2014.

WIGGINS, Martin. British Drama, 1558-1642. Oxford: OUP, 10 vols., 2007-.

WILSON, Dover (Ed.), The first Part of King Henry VI. Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: CUP, 1952.

WILSON, John Dover ed., Titus Andronicus. Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: CUP, 1948.

WOOLLETT, Katherine and MAGUIRE, Eleanor A. ‘Acquiring “the Knowledge” of London’s Layout Drives Structural Brain Changes’, Current Biology, vol. 21, 2109-14, 2011.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-03-11 — Atualizado em 2022-08-01

Versões

Como Citar

Taylor, G., & Nance, J. V. (2022). Imitação ou colaboração? Marlowe e o cânone shakespeareano inicial. Letras, 109–140. https://doi.org/10.5902/2176148564672 (Original work published 11º de março de 2021)

Edição

Edição Especial - 2/2020: Teatro Elisabetano e Jacobino: estudos textuais, teatrais e críticos

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Copyright (c) 2021 Letras

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Ficam concedidos a Letras todos os direitos autorais referentes aos trabalhos publicados. Os originais não devem ter sido publicados ou submetidos simultaneamente a outro periódico e não serão devolvidos. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não comerciais.