Developing academic oral skills using the video pitch as a learning strategy
Palavras-chave:Academic Oral Skills, Video Pitch, Online Task
This research reports on the success of an online oral task developed for English for Academic Purposes learners in a Brazilian university context, which required recording and submitting a short video pitch about the students’ own research. We discuss the contributions the task brought to improving oral academic skills, focusing on the videos and comments posted in the online forum, and the students’ self-evaluations. Our results indicate that issues such as identity, agency, and autonomy play an important role in the teaching and learning of EAP and deserve attention when designing materials for students in this specific context.
ABRAMS, Z. I. The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, v. 87, n. 2, p. 157-167, 2003.
ALTBACH, P. G.; KNIGHT, J. The Internationalization of Higher Education: motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in Inter-national Education, v. 11, n. 3-4, p. 290-305, 2007.
ALWI, N.; SIDHU, G. Oral presentation: self-perceived compe-tence and actual performance among UiTM business faculty students. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 90, p. 98-106, 2013.
ARAGÃO, R. Beliefs and emotions in foreign language learning. System, v. 39, n. 3, p. 302-313, 2011.
BANKOWSKI, E. Developing skills for effective academic presenta-tions in EAP. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, v. 22, p. 187-196, 2010.
BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. São Paulo: Almedina, 2011.
BARRETT, N. E.; LIU, G. Z. Global trends and research aims for English academic oral presentations: Changes, challenges, and opportunities for learning technology. Review of Educational Research, v. 86, n. 4, p. 1227-1271, 2016.
BEAUVOIS, M. E-talk: attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, v. 28, n. 3, p. 177-190, 1994.
BENSON, P. Autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman, 2001.BENSON, P.; VOLLER, P. Autonomy and independence in language learning. London: Longman, 1997.
BROWN, P.; LEVINSON, S. C. Politeness: some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
BUCHOLTZ, M.; HALL, K. Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, v. 7, n. 4-5, p. 585-614, 2005.
CARSON, L.; BARTNECK, C.; VOGES, K. Over-competitiveness in aca-demia: A literature review. Disruptive Science and Technology, v. 1, n. 4, p. 183-190, 2013.
CARTER-THOMAS, S.; ROWLEY-JOLIVET, E. Analysing the scientific conference presentation (CP): a methodological overview of a mul-timodal genre. ASP, v. 39-40, p. 59-72, 2003.
CASTAÑEDA, M. E. “I am proud that I did it and it’s a piece of me”: Digital Storytelling in the Foreign Language Classroom. CALICO Journal, v. 30, n.1, p. 44-62, 2013.
DEHAAN, J.; JOHNSON, N. H.; YOSHIMURA, N.; KONDO, T. Wiki and digi-tal video use in strategic interaction-based experiential EFL learning. CALICO Journal, v. 29, n. 2, p. 249-268, 2012.
DE WIT, H. Strategies for internationalization of Higher Education:A comparative study of Australia, Canada, Europe and the United States of America.Amsterdam: European Association for International Education, 1995.
DONATO, R. Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom In: LANTOLF, J. P. (Ed.). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 27-50.
DÖRNYEI, Z. The L2 Motivational Self System. In: DÖRNYEI, Z.; USHIODA, E. (Eds.) Motivation, language identity and the L2 self . Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2009, p. 9-42.
DÖRNYEI, Z.; USHIODA, E. Teaching and researching: motivation. Pearson Education, 2011.
DUFF, P. A. Identity, agency, and second language acquisition. In: GASS, S.; MACKEY, A. (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Routledge, 2012, p. 410-426.
GARCIA, A. I. Going digital: challenges and opportunities in trans-forming face to face ALL workshops into online versions. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, v. 12, n. 1, p. A115-A127, 2018.
HAFNER, C.; MILLER, L. Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: a collaborative digital video project in a technological learning envi-ronment. Language Learning & Technology, v. 15, n. 3, p. 68-86, 2011.
HOLMES, J. Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguis-tics, v. 91, p. 20-44, 1988.
HOLEC, H. Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Per-gamon, 1981.
HORWITZ, E. K.; HORWITZ, M. B.; COPE, J. Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern language journal, v. 70, n. 2, p. 125-132, 1986.
HYLAND, F.; HYLAND, K. Sugaring the pill: praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, v. 10, p. 185-212, 2001.
HYLAND, K. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in acade-mic writing. London: Longman, 2000.
JARVIS, H. Investigating the classroom applications of computers on EFL courses at Higher Education Institutions in the UK. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, v. 3, n. 2, p. 111-137, 2004.
KIM, H. Learning opportunities in synchronous computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, v. 27, n. 1, p. 26-43, 2014.
KIM, S. Academic oral communication needs of east asian interna-tional graduate students in non-science and non-engineering fields. English for Specific Purposes, v. 25, p. 479-489, 2006.
LANTOLF, J. P.; THORNE, S. L. Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
LEVY, M.; HUBBARD, P. Theory in computer-assisted language learning research and practice. In: The Routledge handbook of languagelearning and technology. London, New York: Routledge, 2016, p. 50-64.
LEE, L. Digital news stories: building language learners content knowledge and speaking skills. foreign Language Annals, v. 47, n. 2, p. 338-356, 2014.
LITTLE, D. Language learner autonomy: some fundamental conside-rations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, v. 1, n. 1, p. 14-29, 2007.
LIU, M.; JACKSON, J. An exploration of Chinese EFL learners’ unwillingness to communicate and foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, v. 92, n. 1, p. 71-86, 2008.
LYS, F. The development of advanced learner oral proficiency using iPads. Language Learning & Technology, v. 17, n. 3, p. 94-116, 2013.
MACINTYRE, P. D. Motivation, anxiety and emotion in second language acquisition. In: ROBINSON, P. (Ed.). Individual differences in instruc-ted languagelearning. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2002, p. 45-68.
MCNEIL, L. Ecological affordance and anxiety in an oral asynchro-nous computer-mediated environment. Language Learning & Technology, v. 18, n. 1, p. 142-159, 2014.
NORTON, B. Identity and language learning: gender, ethnicity and educational change. London: Longman/Pearson Education, 2000.
O’REILLY, T. What is Web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications and Stra-tegies, v. 65, n. 1, p. 17-37, 2007.
PAIVA, V. L. M. O. Identity, motivation, and autonomy from the perspective of complex dynamical systems In: MURRAY, G.; GAO, Z.; LAMB, T. (Eds.) Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning. Toronto: Multilingual Matters, 2011, p. 57-74.
PARMAXI, A.; ZAPHIRIS, P. Web 2.0 in Computer Assisted Language Learning: a research synthesis and implications for instructional design and educational practice. Interactive Learning Environ-ments, v. 25, n. 6, p. 704-716, 2016.
PAYNE, J. S.; WHITNEY, P. J. Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, p. 7-32, 2002.
POP, A.; TOMULETIU, E. A.; DAVID, D. EFL speaking communication with asynchronous, voice tools for adult students. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 15, n. 2, p. 1199-1203, 2011.
POZA, M. I. C. The effects of asynchronous computer voice conferencing on L2 learners’ speaking anxiety. The International Association for Language Learning Technology Journal, v. 41, n. 1, p. 33-63, 2011.
PRESSLEY, M. Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In: FARSTRUP, A. E.; SAMUELS, S. J. (Eds.). What research has to say about reading instruction. Newark: International Reading Association, 2002, p. 291-309.
PROCTER, R.; WILLIAMS, R.; STEWART, J. If you build it, will they come? How researchers perceive and use Web 2.0. research infor-mation network. 2010. Retrieved from: http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/web_2.0_screen.pdf. Access: July 12, 2020.
QIANG, Z. Internationalization of Higher Education: towards a conceptual framework. Policy futures in Education, v. 1, n. 2, p. 248-270, 2003.
ROCHE, T. Assessing the role of digital literacy in English for Acade-mic Purposes university pathway programs. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, v. 11, n. 1, p. 71-87, 2018.
ROVAI, A. P. Building sense of community at a distance. The Inter-national Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, v. 3, n. 1, 2002.
ROYAL, M. A.; ROSSI, R. J. Individual-level correlates of sense of community: findings from workplace and school. Journal of Com-munity Psychology, v. 24, n. 4, p. 395-416, 1996.
SÁ, E. M. The Global English Corporate Learning Service™ as a Tool for Developing Learner Autonomy in Business English Language Teaching and Learning.In: Proceedings of the InTED2012 6th International Technology, Education and Development Confe-rence. Valencia (Spain), March 5-7, 2012.
SABRI, U.; QIN, T. Communication apprehension among Nilai college students. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, v. 5, n. 5, p. 46-49, 2014.
SUN, Y. C. Examining the effectiveness of extensive speaking prac-tice via voice blogs in a foreign language learning context. CALICO Journal, v. 29, n. 3, p. 494-506, 2012.
SUN, Y.-C.; YANG, F.-Y. I help, therefore, I learn: service learning on Web 2.0 in an EFL speaking class. Computer Assisted Language Learning, v. 28, n. 3, p. 202-219, 2013.
THANASOULAS, D. What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered? The Internet TESL Journal, v. 6, n. 11, 2002.
TUOMAITĖ, V.; ZAJANKAUSKAITĖ, Z. Oral communication in a foreign language competence development in academic context. Kalbų Studijos, v. 31, p. 113-129, 2017.
USHIODA, E.; DÖRNYEI, Z. Motivation. In: GASS, S.; MACKEY, A. (Eds.). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition.New York: Routledge, 2012, p.396-409.
VITASARI, P.; WAHAB, M. N. A.; OTHMAN, A.; AWANG, M. G. Research for identifying study anxiety sources among university students. International Education Studies, v. 3, n. 2, 189-196, 2010.
VYGOTSKY, L. S. Mind in society: The development of higher psycho-logical processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
WARSCHAUER, M. Sociocultural perspectives on CALL. CALL Rese-arch Perspectives, p. 53-64, 2005.
WENDEN, A. Learner strategies for learner autonomy. London: Prentice Hall, 1991.WENGER, E. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, v. 7. n. 2, p. 225-246, 2000.
YANG, L. Doing a group presentation: negotiations and challenges experienced by five Chinese ESL students of commerce at a Canadian university. Language Teaching Research, v. 14, n. 2, p. 141-160, 2010.
YANG, W. Stance and engagement: a corpus-based analysis of academic spoken discourse across science domains. LSP Journal-Language for special purposes, professional communication, knowledge management and cognition, v. 5, n. 1, p. 62-78, 2014.
YOUNG, D. The relationship between anxiety and foreign language oral proficiency ratings. foreign Language Annals, v. 19, n. 5, p. 439-445, 1986.
Copyright (c) 2021 Letras
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Ficam concedidos a Letras todos os direitos autorais referentes aos trabalhos publicados. Os originais não devem ter sido publicados ou submetidos simultaneamente a outro periódico e não serão devolvidos. Em virtude de aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não comerciais.