Estatal Turvo: visitación en tiempos de administración pública

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236499485823

Palabras clave:

Áreas protegidas, Biodiversidad, Uso público

Resumen

Los Parques Estatales, así como los Nacionales, tener entre sus objetivos el desafío de sensibilizar a los visitantes a través del desarrollo de actividades educativas e interpretación ambiental. Sin embargo, para lograr este propósito es necesario conocer el perfil de las personas que lo visitan. Desde esta perspectiva, realizamos una investigación de campo para identificar el perfil de los visitantes del Parque Estadual do Turvo entre 2018 y 2019, así como analizar las motivaciones y expectativas de los turistas al recorrer el territorio de la unidad de conservación. Para ello, administramos un cuestionario a 144 visitantes para evaluar la percepción de los visitantes a su llegada (antes de la visita) y a su salida (después de la visita). Los resultados permiten creer que la gestión del uso público en el período evaluado no logró el “respeto ambiental” pretendido. Para ello, el Parque Estatal Turvo debe invertir en diferentes formas interpretativas sobre la biodiversidad y, en especial, sobre el ecosistema del jaguar, con el fin de involucrar y concientizar a los visitantes sobre la importancia de las áreas protegidas, así como sobre la conservación de la naturaleza.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Suzane Bevilacque Marcuzzo, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria

Restauración de zonas degradadas, ecología y conservación de la naturaleza

Letícia Pawoski Jaskulski, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Su

Máster en Biología Animal UFRGS en curso

Adriano Severo Figueiró, Universidad Federal de Santa María

Doctorado en geografía

José Cardoso Sobrinho, Universidad Federal de Santa María

Doctorado en Ingeniería Agrícola

Citas

ARCHER, D.; WEARING, S. Interpretation and marketing as management tools in national parks: Insights from Australia. J Retail Leisure Property, n. 2, p. 29–39, 2002.

BALLEW, M.T.; OMOTO, A.M. Absorption: How nature experiences promote awe and other positive emotions. Ecopsychology, v.10, p.26–35, 2018.

BALMFORD A.; GREEN, J. M. H.; ANDERSON, M.; BERESFORD, J.; HUANG, C.; NAIDOO, R.; WALPOLE, M.; MANICA, A. Walk on the Wild Side: Estimating the Global Magnitude of Visits to Protected Areas. PLoS Biol, v.13, n.2, p. 1-6, 2015.

BRAMWELL, B.; HIGHAM, J.; LANE, B.; MILLER, G. Twenty-five years of sustainable tourism and the Journal of Sustainable Tourism: looking back and moving forward. Journal Sustainabilide Tourism. V. 25, n.1, p. 1–9, 2017.

BOQUIMPANI-FREITAS, L.; COSTA, N. C. Perfil demográfico, de preferências e motivações dos usuários de trilhas de quatro Parques Nacionais brasileiros. Revista Brasileira de Ecoturismo, Rio de Janeiro, v.16, n.1, p. 09-31, 2023.

BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Secretaria de Biodiversidade e Florestas. Biodiversidade brasileira: avaliação e identificação de áreas e ações prioritárias para a conservação, utilização sustentável e repartição dos benefícios da biodiversidade nos biomas brasileiros. Brasília: MMA/SBF, 2002. 404 p.

BRATMAN, G.N.; HAMILTON, J.P.; DAILY, G.C. The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. v.1249, p. 118–136, 2012.

CARTWRIGHT, K. S.; MITTEN, D. Examining the influence of outdoor recreation, employment, and demographic variables on the human-nature relationship. J. Sustain. Educ., v.12, 2017.

CLELAND, V.; CRAWFORD, D.; BAUR, L. A.; HUME, C.; TIMPERIO, A.; SALMON, J. A prospective examination of children’s time spent outdoors, objectively measured physical activity and overweight. Int. J. Obes., v.32, p. 1685–1693, 2008.

DAUGSTAD, K.; SVARSTAD, H.; VISTAD, O. I. A case of conflicts in conservation: two trenches or a three-dimensional complexity? Landscape Res. v. 31, p. 1–19, 2006.

DOUCOULIAGOS, H.; HALL, J. Park Visitation, Constraints, and Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. School Working Paper – Economic Series, n.18, p. 1-144, 2010.

EVANS, G. W.; OTTO, S.; KAISER, F.G. Childhood origins of young adult environmental behavior. Psychol. Sci., p. 679–687, 2018.

EWERT, A.; CHANG, Y. Levels of nature and stress response. Behav. Sci., v.8, n.49, 2018.

FANG, C.; YAMANAKA, Y.; TRENCHER G. Arrival briefings as an effective interpretation strategy in tourist destinations: The case of Daisetsuzan National Park, Japan. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism. v. 33. 2021.

FRUMKIN, H.; BRATMAN, G.N.; BRESLOW, S.J.; COCHRAN, B.; KAHN, P.H., JR.; LAWLER, J.J.; LEVIN, P.S.; TANDON, P.S.; VARANASI, U.; WOLF, K.L.; et al. Nature contact and human health: A research agenda. Environ. Health Perspect., p.125, 2017.

GUADAGNIN, D. L. Zonificación del Parque Estadual do Turvo, RS, Brasil, y directivas para el plan de manejo. Disertación (Maestría en manejo de vida silvestre). Córdoba (Argentina): Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, 1994.

GUNDERSEN, V.; RYBRATEN, S. Differing perceptions and tensions among tourists and locals concerning a National Parks region in Norway. Journal of Rural Studies. V. 94, p. 477- 487, 2022.

HANSMANN, R.; HUG, S.-M.; SEELAND, K. Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban For. Urban Green. v.6, p. 213–225, 2007.

HARTIG, T.; KAISER, F. G.; STRUMSE, E. Psychological restoration in nature as a source of motivation for ecological behavior. Environ. Conserv., v.34, p. 291–299, 2007.

HARTIG, T.; MITCHELL, R.; DE VRIES, S.; FRUMKIN, H. Nature and health. Annu. Rev. Public Health, v.36, p. 207–228, 2014.

IUCN. Panthera onca, Jaguar. International Union Conservation for Nature, 2023. Disponível em: http://www.iucnredlist.org. Acesso em: 04 out. 2023.

JUFFE-BIGNOLI, D.; BURGESS, N. D.; BINGHAM, H.; BELLE, E. M. S.; DE LIMA, M. G.; DEGUIGNET, M.; BERTZKY, B.; MILAM, A.N.; MARTINEZ-LOPEZ, J.; LEWIS, E.; EASSOM,A; WICANDER, S.; GELDMANN, J.; VAN SOESBERGEN A.; ARNELL, A. P.; O’CONNOR, B.; PARK, S.; SHI, Y., N.; DANKS, F. S.; MACSHARRY, B.; KINGSTON, N. Protected Planet Report 2014. Cambridge, UK: UNEPWCMC, 2014.

KARJALAINEN, E.; SARJALA, T.; RAITIO, H. Promoting human health through forests: Overview and major challenges. Environ. Health Prev. Med. v.15, p. 1–8, 2010.

KIL, N.; HOLLAND, S. M.; STEIN, T. V. Structural relationships between environmental attitudes, recreation motivations, and environmentally responsible behaviors. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. v.7, 16–25, 2014.

LEUNG, Y.; SPENCELEY, A.; HVENEGAARD, G.; BUCKLEY, R. (Eds.). Tourism and visitor management in protected areas: Guidelines for sustainability. Gland: IUCN, 2018.

MIDDLETON, AD.; STOELLINGER, T.; KARANDIKAR, H.; LEONARD, B.; DOREMUS, H.; KREMEN, C. Harnessing visitors› enthusiasm for national parks to fund cooperative large-landscape conservation. Conservation Science and Practice, v.3, n.2, p.1-12, 2021.

MOORE, S. A.; RODGER, K.; TAPLIN, R. Moving beyond visitor satisfaction to loyalty in nature-based tourism: a review and research agenda. Current Issues in Tourism, v.18, n.7, p.667-683, 2015.

MUNRO, J. K.; MORRISON-SAUNDERS, A. Environmental Interpretation Evaluation in Natural Areas. Journal of Ecotourism, v. 7, n.1, p. 1-14, 2008.

NEASOME, D.; MOORE, S. A.; DOWLING, R. K. Natural area tourism. Ecology, impacts and management. Bristol: Channel View Publications. 2013.

OTTO, S.; PENSINI, P. Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behavior. Glob. Environ. Chang., v.47, p. 88–94, 2017.

PEATTIE DS, CLARKE P, and PEATTIE K. Risk and responsibility in tourism: Promoting sun safety. Tourism Management. v.26, p. 399–408, 2005.

PLUMB, G.; WILSON, E. O.; PLUMB, S.; EHRLICH, P. J. Biodiversity and national parks: What’s relevance got to do with it? Park Science, v. 31, n.1, 2014.

PIOVESANI, W. S. Lista atualizada da flora vascular do Parque Estadual do Turvo, Derrubadas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Trabalho de conclusão de curso de graduação (Ciências Biológicas). Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 2021.

PRETTY, J.; PEACOCK, J.; HINE, R.; SELLENS, M.; SOUTH, N.; GRI, M. Green exercise in the UK countryside: Eectsnon health and psychological well-being, and implications for policy and planning. J. Environ. Plan. Manag., v.50, p.211–231, 2007.

RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Secretaria Estadual do Meio Ambiente (SEMA - RS). Plano de manejo do Parque Estadual do Turvo - RS. Porto Alegre: Divisão de Unidades de Conservação do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, 2005, 348 p.

SHIN, W. S.; YEOUN, P. S.; YOO, R. W.; SHIN, C. S. Forest experience and psychological health benefits: The state of the art and future prospect in Korea. Environ. Health Prev. Med, v.15, p. 38–47, 2010.

SHLENS, J. A tutorial on principal component analysis. Institute for Nonlinear Science, UCSD, 2010.

SILVA, L. G.; MELLER, D. A.; BJORN-EINAR, N.; PAVIOLO, A.; NICOLÁS, L. O.; KLEIN, V.; ROCHA, M.; TIRELLI, F. P.; MAZIM, F. D.; PACHLA, L. A. CRAWSHAW JR, P. The thin Red Line: The last critically endangered jaguars (Pantera onca) from the sowthern neotropics. Anais e Resumos XXXII Congresso Brasileiro de Zoologia: Desafios e Perspectivas para a Zoologia na América Latina. Editores: Anamaria Dal Molin [et al]: Universidade Federal da Integração Latino-Americana e Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia. Foz do Iguaçú, 2018.

TILDEN, F. Interpreting our heritage. Chapel Hill (North Carolina): The University of North Carolina Press.1977.

TONGE , J.; MOORE , S. A. Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: A Western Australian case study . Tourism Management , v.28, n. 3, p. 768 – 76, 2007 .

TONGE, J.; MOORE, S. A.; TAPLIN, R. Visitor satisfaction analysis as a tool for park managers: a review and case study. Annals of Leisure Research, v.14, n.4, p. 289-303, 2011.

VESPESTAD, M.K.; LINDBERG,F. Understanding nature-based tourist experiences: an ontological analysis. Current Issues in Tourism, v.14, n.6, p.563-580, 2011.

XIAO. X.; AULTMAN-HALL, L.; MANNING, R.; VOIGT, B. The impact of spatial accessibility and perceived barriers on visitation to the US national park system. Journal of Transport Geography, v. 68, pp. 205-214, 2018.

XIAO, X.; LEE, K. J.; LARSON, L. R. Who visits U.S. national parks (and who doesn’t)? A national study of perceived constraints and vacation preferences across diverse populations. Journal of Leisure Research, v. 53, p.3, p.404–425, 2021.

WILSON, E. Biophilia. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1984.

WINTER, K. B.; LINCOLN, N. K.; BERKES, F. et al. Ecomimicry in Indigenous resource management: optimizing ecosystem services to achieve resource abundance, with examples from Hawai`i. Ecology and Society, v.25, n.2, p. 1-18, 2020.

WOLSKO, C.; LINDBERG, K.; REESE, R. Nature-based physical recreation leads to psychological well-being: Evidence from five studies. Ecopsychology, 2019.

ZHANG, S.; CHAN, C-S. Nature-based tourism development in Hong Kong: Importance–Performance perceptions of local residents and tourists. Tourism Management Perspectives, n.20, p. 28-46, 2016.

ZIEGLER, J.; DEARDEN, P.; ROLLINS, R. But are tourists satisfied? Importance-performance analysis of the whale shark tourism industry on Isla Holbox, Mexico. Tourism Management, v.33, n.3, p. 692-701, 2012.

Publicado

2024-10-18

Cómo citar

Marcuzzo, S. B., Jaskulski, L. P., Figueiró, A. S., & Cardoso Sobrinho, J. (2024). Estatal Turvo: visitación en tiempos de administración pública. Geografia Ensino & Pesquisa, 28, e85823. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236499485823