Disgenesia do híbrido em populações naturais de Drosophila melanogaster.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27019Abstract
Hybrid dysgenesis has been defined as a remarkable syndrome of correlated genetic traits that are produced in some particular crosses between certain strains. The present study main objective was classify recently collected Drosophila melanogaster strains in relation to P element activity and regulatory capacity. Our results to natural populations trapped from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil and Colombia shows that it fell on Q class, since all examinated strains has showed P elements by molecular analysis and low P activity. In the same way, these strains shows low susceptibility to P element action. The bigger values found in the colombian population are in agreement with the clinal hypothesis to P element activity.
Downloads
References
BLACKMAN, R. e GELBART, W. Hobo elements in Drosophila melanogaster. In: BERG, D.E. & HOWE, M.M. (ed). Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., p. 523-529,1989.
BOUSSY, IA. A Latitudinal cline in P-M gonadal dysgenesis potential in Australian Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genetic Research (Cambridge), 49: 11-18, 1987.
BREGLlANO, J.C. e KIDWELL, M.G. Hybrid dysgenesis determinants. In: SHAPIRO, JA (ed) Mobile Genetic Elements, London, Academic Press, p.363-410, 1983.
ENGELS, W.R. P elements in Drosophila melanogaster. in: BERG, D.E. & HOWE, M.M. Mobile DNA, Washington, Amer. Soc. for Microb, 1989.
JOWETT, T. Preparation of nucleic acids, in: Roberts D. B. (Ed.) Drosophila: a Practical Approach, IRC Press., Washington, DC, pp. 275-286, 1986.
KAPLAN, N., DARDEN, T. e LANGLEY, C. Evolution and extinction of transposable elements in Mendelian population. Genetics, 109: .459-480, 1985.
KIDWELL, M.G. e LlSCH, D. Transposable elements as sources of variation in animals and plants. PNAS 94: 7704-7711, 1997.
KIDWELL, M.G. e KIDWELL, J.F. Selection for male recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 84: 333- 338, 1976.
RUFO, V.C., Disgenesia híbrida induzida pelos elementos transponíveis P e Hobo em linhagens de Drosophila melanogaster de diferentes regiões brasileiras. Dissertação de mestrado apresentada ao Curso de PG em Ciências Biológicas da UNESP de São José do Rio Preto - SP, 1997.
SVED, J.A. Hybrid dysgenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. a possible explanation in terms of spatial organization of chromosomes. Aus. J. Biol. Sci. 29: 375-382, 1976.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
