Numerical analysis of the effect of deflectors inserted inside the duct of an oscillating water column device with an existing Savonius turbine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X87150Keywords:
Oscillating water column, Savonius turbine, Deflectors, Turbulent flowsAbstract
In this work, a comparison between three different configurations of deflectors inserted inside the duct of an oscillating water column device (OWC), where is attached a rotating Savonius turbine in the same domain, is done. In the first configuration, the numerical model is composed only by the Savonius turbine inside the OWC duct. In the second configuration, just one deflector is inserted upstream of the turbine region. In the third case, a second deflector is inserted, together with the first one, but downstream of the turbine. For every studied model, the geometry of the hydropneumatic chamber was varied by three values of the ratio H1/L1 (the height times the length). This geometric variation was performed according to the Constructal Design methodology. The purpose of this comparison was the evaluation of the OWC pneumatic power, the power coefficient, and the Savonius turbine power. The results indicated that for all the studied configurations, the ratio H1/L1 as well as the deflectors presence inside the OWC duct had an influence in terms of the performance indicators, especially regarding the pneumatic power, where variations up to 100 W were noticed.
Downloads
References
AKWA, J. V. (2010). Análise aerodinâmica de turbinas eólica Savonius empregando dinâmica dos fluidos computacional. [Dissertação de Mestrado em Engenharia Mecânica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul]. Repositório Institucional da UFRGS.
Blackwell, B. F., Sheldahal, R. E., & Feltz, L. V. (1977). Wind Tunnel Performance Data for Two-and Three-Buckets Savonius Rotors. Final Report SAND76-0131. Albuquerque (USA): Sandia Laboratories.
Bejan, A. (2018). Thermodynamics Today. Energy, 160, 1208-1219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.092.
Custódio, R. (2009). Energia Eólica para Produção de Energia Elétrica. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): Eletrobrás. ISBN: 978-8561325886.
Isoldi, L. A., Grimler, J. D. A. M., Letzow, M., Souza, J. A., Gomes, M. D. N., Rocha, L. A. O., & Dos Santos, E. D. (2015). 3D Numerical Analysis About the Shape Influence of the Hydro-Pneumatic Chamber in an Oscillating Water Column (OWC). Therm. Eng., 14, 03-08. doi: https://doi.org/10.5380/reterm.v14i1.62106.
Jenniches, S. (2018). Assessing the regional economic impacts of renewable energy sources – A literature review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 93, 35-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.008.
Letzow, M., Lorenzini, G., Barbosa, D. V. E., Hübner, R. G., Rocha, L. A. O., Gomes, M. N., Isoldi, L. A., & Dos Santos, E. D. (2020). Numerical analysis of the influence of geometry on a large scale onshore oscillating water column device with associated seabed ramp. Int. J. Design Nat. Ecodyn., 15, 873-884. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijdne.150613.
Menter, F.R. (1993). Zonal Two Equation j–x Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows. Proceedings of the AIAA 24th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.
Menter, F.R., Kuntz, M., & Langtry, R. (2003). Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model. In: Hanjalić, K., Nagano, Y., & Tummers, M. (Orgs.). Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer (pp. 625–632). Begell House.
Pinto Jr., E. A., Gomes, M. D. N., Rocha, L. A. O., Dos Santos, E. D., & Isoldi, L. A. (2019). Evaluation of Static Pressure Behavior in an Oscillating Water Column Wave Energy Converter. Therm. Eng., 18, 36-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.5380/reterm.v18i1.67045.
Santos, A. L. G. (2023). Modelagem numérica e método Design Construtal para avaliação geométrica de um dispositivo do tipo coluna de água oscilante considerando a inserção de uma turbina Savonius. [Tese Doutorado em Modelagem Computacional, Universidade Federal de Rio Grande]. Repositório Institucional da FURG.
Santos, A. L. G., Teixeira, F. B., Isoldi, L. A., Souza, J. A., Gomes, M. D. N., Rocha, L. A. O., Dos Santos, E. D. (2021). Numerical Analysis of a Savonius Turbine Inserted in Oscillating Water Column Wave Energy Converter. Proceedings of the 26th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering (2021), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Savonius, S. J. (1930). Wind Rotor. United States Patent Office. Helsínque, Finlândia.
Versteeg, H. K., & Malalasekera, W. (2007). An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: the finite volume method. The finite volume method. 2. ed. Harlow (England): Pearson Education Limited.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.