Correlation and path analysis in wheat traits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X83803Keywords:
Triticum aestivum L., Uniformity trials, Linear relationAbstract
The objective of this work was to verify if there are linear relations between wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) traits obtained through measurement, counting, and weighing. In 17 uniformity trials, 630, 630, 100, 100, and 330 wheat plants of the cultivars TBIO Energia I, TBIO Energia II, TBIO Sossego, TBIO Toruk, and TBIO Audaz were randomly harvested, respectively. In these 1790 plants, traits were evaluated through measurement: main stem length and main stem ear length; count: numbers of leaves, stems, and ears; and weighing: fresh and dry matter of leaves, stems, ears, and shoots. The linear relations between these 13 traits were investigated through correlation and path analyses. There are linear relations between wheat traits, obtained through measurement, counting, and weighing. The number of ears per plant has a positive linear relation with the amounts of fresh and dry matter in shoots. The fact that there is no need to destroy the plants to count the ears makes it possible to select plants aiming at increasing the fresh and dry matter of shoots, keeping them in the field.
Downloads
References
ALVARES, C. A.; STAPE, J. L.; SENTELHAS, P. C.; GONÇALVES, J. L. de M.; SPAROVEK, G. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, v.22, n.6, p.711-728, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
BORÉM, A.; SCHEEREN, P. L. Trigo: do plantio à colheita. Minas Gerais: UFV, 2015.
BUSSAB, W. O.; MORETTIN, P. A. Estatística Básica. 9. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2017.
CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.; BUBANS, V. E.; OSMARI, L. F.; SOMAVILLA, F. M.; ORTIZ, V. M. Sample size and linear relations in traits of cut and grazing sorghum. Revista Brasileira de Milho e Sorgo, v.21, p.e1279, 2022a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18512/rbms2022v21e1279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18512/rbms2022v21e1279
CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.; FACCO, G.; SANTOS, G. O.; ALVES, B. M.; BURIN, C.; KLEINPAUL, J. A. Linear relations among pigeon pea traits. Comunicata Scientiae, v.8, n.3, p.493-502, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/CS.v8i3.1420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14295/cs.v8i3.1420
CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.; SILVEIRA, D. L.; BUBANS, V. E.; OSMARI, B. F.; SOMAVILLA, F. M.; ORTIZ, V. M.; OSMARI, L. F. Sample size and linear relations in slender leaf rattlebox. Revista de Agricultura Neotropical, v.9, n.2, p.e6834, 2022b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v9i2.6834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32404/rean.v9i2.6834
CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.; SILVEIRA, D. L.; SOMAVILLA, F. M.; OSMARI, B. F.; ORTIZ, V. M. Sampling sufficiency, correlation and path analysis in showy rattlebox. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, v.44, n.1, p.203-216, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2022v44n1p203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n1p203
CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.; TOEBE, M.; ALVES, B. M.; BURIN, C.; SANTOS, G. O.; FACCO, G.; NEU, I. M. M. Relações lineares entre caracteres de aveia preta. Ciência Rural, v.45, n.6, p.985-992, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20140500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20140500
CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.; TOEBE, M.; ALVES, B. M.; BURIN, C.; WARTHA, C. A. Linear relations among traits in jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis). Bioagro, v.30, n.2, p.157-162, 2018. Disponível em: https://revistas.uclave.org/index.php/bioagro/article/view/1291
CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.; TOEBE, M.; BURIN, C.; ALVES, B. M.; FACCO, G.; CASAROTTO, G. Relações lineares entre caracteres de nabo forrageiro e de tremoço branco. Ciência Rural, v.44, n.1, p.18-24, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782014000100004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782014000100004
CRUZ, C. D.; CARNEIRO, P. C. S.; REGAZZI, A. J. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético: v.2. 3. ed. Viçosa: UFV, 2014.
CRUZ, C. D.; REGAZZI, A. J.; CARNEIRO, P. C. S. Modelos biométricos aplicados ao melhoramento genético: v.1. 4. ed. Viçosa: UFV, 2012.
CRUZ, C.D. Genes Software - extended and integrated with the R, Matlab and Selegen. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, v.38, n.4, p.547-552, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i4.32629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v38i3.32629
FERREIRA, D. F. Estatística Básica. 2. ed. Lavras: UFLA, 2009.
FOLLMANN, D. N.; ROSSATO, R. M.; FREIBERG, C. M.; LEMAINSKI, L. E.; NIED, A. H.; CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A. Correlation and path analysis in wheat cultivars in the initial period of development. Scientia Agraria Paranaensis, v.19, n.4, p.386-394, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18188/sap.v19i4.25270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18188/sap.v19i4.25270
ORTIZ, V. M.; CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.; LORO, M. V.; SOMAVILLA, F. M.; SCHULLER, B. R.; REIS, M. B.; ANDRETTA, J. A. Correlação e análise de trilha entre caracteres de teosinto. Sigmae, v. 12, p. 29-39, 2023. Disponível em: https://publicacoes.unifal-mg.edu.br/revistas/index.php/sigmae/article/view/2012/1565
PANDEY, R.; MAHARJAN, B.; ACHARYA, S.; BIGYAN, K. C.; PANDIT, R.; REGMI, R.; BHUSAL, B.; NEUPANE, P.; BHATTARAI, K.; POUDEL, M. R. Correlation and path coefficient analysis of yield in wheat: a review. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, v.5, n.113, p. 121-127, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2021-05.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2021-05.14
SANTOS, H. G. dos; JACOMINE, P. K. T.; ANJOS, L. H. C. dos; OLIVEIRA, V. A. de; LUMBRERAS, J. F.; COELHO, M. R.; ALMEIDA, J. A. de; ARAÚJO FILHO, J. C. de; OLIVEIRA, J. B. de; CUNHA, T. J. F. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos. 5.ed. rev. e ampl. Brasília: Embrapa, 2018.
TOEBE, M.; BANDEIRA, C. T.; FORTES, S. K. G.; CARVALHO, J. O.; TARTAGLIA, F. L.; TAMBARA, A. L.; MELO, P. J. Dimensionamento amostral e associação linear entre caracteres de Crotalaria spectabilis. Bragantia, v.76, n.1, p.45-53, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.653
ZADOKS, J. C.; CHANG, T. T.; KONZAK, C. F. A decimal code for the growth stages ofcereals. Weed Research, v.14, n.6, p 415-421, 1974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ciência e Natura

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.