Geometries and space positioning of ancient scars from landslides on slopes at the headwaters of the Mãe Luzia River, Treviso - Santa Catarina, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X41558Keywords:
Landslides, Georeferencing, OrthorectificationAbstract
The occurrence of landslides can result in negative consequences for the ecosystems and society. On the understanding of these events, aerial photographs constitute an important collection for multitemporal investigations, making it possible to obtain the accuracy of surface coordinates, since they are georeferenced and orthorectified. The main objective of this work is to georeferentiate and orthorectify aerial photographs and to make comparisons in the calibration of geometries and positioning of old scars of landslides on slopes. The study area is a detail of 94 ha (0.94 km²) of the headwaters of the Mãe Luzia River, municipality of Treviso (SC), site with landslide records in 1978. To reach the scope, the georeferencing and feature editions were performed with geoprocessing software and orthorectification with the Digital Photogrammetric Station of the E-Foto project. The total area of scars obtained in the first polynomial order was 5 hectares, in the second order 4.98, in the third order 5.14 and, after orthorectification, 5.51 hectares. The altimetric variation produced greater distortions between sites of depressed topography, after orthorectification, there was a geometric correction of the edited polygons, notably in the bottom of the valleys. It is concluded that it is important not only to georeferentiate, but also to orthorectify old photographs, which have a great amount of valuable information of the past landscape.
Downloads
References
BADOLATO IS, AGUIAR RA. A Integração do Software E-FOTO em um Ambiente de Desenvolvimento XP. Rio de Janeiro: EdUERJ; 2010.
BRITO JLNS, COELHO FILHO LCT. Fotogrametria digital. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: EdUERJ; 2007.
BROOKS C, WIENERT M, SPAETE L, DOBSON R. Georeferencing of Scanned Historical FSA Aerial Photographs for Extraction of Wetlands Boundaries and Other Information for the Michigan NRCS. MichiganTech Research Institute (MTRI). 2008;(1):1-9.
BROVELLI MA, MINGHINI M. Georeferencing old maps: a polynomial-based approach for Como historical cadastres. e-Perimetron. 2012;7(3):97–110.
DEL SOLDATO M, RIQUELME A, BIANCHINI S, TOMÀS R, DI MARTIRE D, DE VITA P, MORETTI S, CALCATERRA D. Multisource data integration to investigate one century of evolution for the Agnone landslide (Molise, southern Italy). Landslides. 2018(15):2113–2128.
DONEUS M, VERHOEVEN G, KAREL W, BRIESE C, PFEIFER N, RESSI C. Towards an automated georeferencing and orthorectification of archaeological aerial photographs. 2013. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241703710.
DONEUS M, WIESER M, VERHOEVEN G, KAREL W, FERA M, PFEIFER N. Automated Archiving of Archaeological Aerial Images. Remote Sensing. 2016;209(8):1-22.
ESRI. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute; 2013.
FARAJI MR, QI X, JENSEN A. Computer vision–based orthorectification and georeferencing of aerial image sets. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing. 2016. Available from: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/Journal-of-Applied-Remote-Sensing.
KAREL W, DONEUS M, VERHOEVEN G, BRIESE C, RESSL C, PFEIFER N. Oriental - automatic geo-referencing ando ortho-rectification of archaeological aerial photographs. In: XXIV International CIPA Symposium [CD-ROM]; 2013 sep 2-6; Strasbourg, France. p.175-180.
LADD GB, NAGCHAUDHURI A, EARL TJ, MITRA M, BLAND GL. Rectification, georeferencing, and mosaicking of images acquired with remotely operated aerial platforms. In: ASPRS Annual Conference [Internet]; 2006 May 1-5; Reno, USA. Available from: https://www.umes.edu/uploadedFiles/_WEBSITES/ECPA/Content/2006ASPRS.pdf.
LUDWIG L, MATTEDI MA. Dos desastres do desenvolvimento ao desenvolvimento dos desastres: a expressão territorial da vulnerabilidade. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente. 2016;(39):23-42.
MICHEL GP, KOBIYAMA M, GOERL RF. Análise comparativa entre os modelos Shalstab e Sinmap na identificação de áreas susceptíveis a escorregamentos translacionais. In: X Encontro Nacional de Engenharia de Sedimentos [CD-ROM]; 2012 dec 3-7, Foz do Iguaçu, Brasil. p.1-21.
MORAD M, CHALMERS AI, O’REGAN PR. The role of root-mean-square error in the geo-transformation of images in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems. 1996; 10(3):347-353.
NIETHAMMER U, JAMES MR, ROTHMUND S, TRAVELLETTI J, JOSWIG M. UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide: Evaluation and results. Engineering Geology. 2012;(128):2–11.
OLSEN MJ, STUEDLEIN AW. Discussion of ‘‘Use of terrestrial laser scanning for the characterization of retrogressive landslides in sensitive clay and rotational landslides in river banks’. Canadian Geotech. 2010; (47):1164–1168.
ONIGA VE, BREABAN AI, STATESCU F. Determining the Optimum Number of Ground Control Points for Obtaining High Precision Results Based on UAS Images. Proceedings. 2018; 352(2):p.1-11.
PIAZZA GA, VIBRANS AC, LIESENBERG V, REFOSCO JC. Object-oriented and pixel-based classification approaches to classify tropical successional stages using airborne high-spacial resolution images. GIScience & Remote Sensing. 2016; 53 (2):206-226.
RIBEIRO JA, BRITO JL, BERNARDO FILHO O, BADOLATO IS, LIMA RD, MOTA GL. E-Foto: an educational photogrammetric workstation. In: Open Source Geospatial Research & Education Symposium (OGRS2018) [Internet]; 2018 oct 9-11; Lugano, Italia. Available from: https://peerj.com/preprints/27210/.
SDS – SECRETARIA DE DESENVOLVIMENTO SUSTENTÁVEL DE SANTA CATARINA. Levantamento Aerofotogramétrico – Ortomosaico RGB: Município de Treviso. Escala 1:2.000. 2011. Available from: http://sigsc.sds.sc.gov.br/download/index.jsp.
SERVIÇOS AEROFOTOGRAMÉTRICOS CRUZEIRO DO SUL S.A. (Santa Catarina, SC). Foto Aérea. Santa Catarina, 1978, nos. 18.486, 18.487 e 18.488. Escala 1:25.000.
SILVA DC. Evolução da Fotogrametria no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Geomática. 2015; 3(2):81–96.
SILVEIRA MT. Considerações Técnicas sobre o Submódulo de Extração do MDE da Versão Integrada do e-foto (versão educacional) [Internet]; 2011. Available from: http://www.efoto.eng.uerj.br/images/Documentos/6Tutorial_MDS_OrtoRetif-16.06.pdf.
TRAMONTINA J, COSTA CC, CORREA NA, PEGORARO AJ. Análise de Usabilidade da Plataforma Fotogramétrica Educacional E- Foto para o Ensino da Fotogrametria Digital. Revista Brasileira de Cartografia. 2017 (69):2019-1040.
VAN DEN EECKHAUT M, HERVÁS J, JAEDICKE C, MALET JP, MONTANARELLA L, NADIM F. Statistical modelling of Europe-wide landslide susceptibility using limited landslide inventory data. Landslides. 2012;9(1):357-369.
VERHOEVEN G, DONEUS M, BRIESE Ch, VERMEULEN F. Mapping by matching: a computer vision-based approach to fast and accurate georeferencing of archaeological aerial photographs. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2010(39):2060–2070.
VERYKOKOU S, IOANNIDIS C. Exterior orientation estimation of oblique aerial imagery using vanishing points. In: XXIII ISPRS Congress [Internet]; 2016 jul 12-19; Prague, Czech Republic. Available from: https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLI-B3/123/2016/isprs-archives-XLI-B3-123-2016.pdf.
WILLNEFF J, POON J. Georeferencing from orthorectified and non-orthorectified high-resolution satellite imagery. CRC for Spatial Information, University of Melbourne [Internet]; 2006; Melbourne, Australia. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3269/cb6ddfba20c6414651e95c49ce7e2a6ee643.pdf.
ZHU L, ERVING A, KOISTINEN K, NUIKKA M, JUNNILAINEN H, HEISKA N, HAGGRÉN H. Georeferencing Multi-Temporal and Multi-Scale Imagery in Photogrammetry. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences [CD-ROM]; 2008, jul 3-11, Beijing, China. p.225-230.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.