Comparison and mapping of municipal groups in the state of Rio Grande do Sul based on socioeconomic indicators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40472Keywords:
Cluster analysis, Group comparison, Thematic maps, Regional groupsAbstract
Understanding how particular regions behave and / or resemble socioeconomic aspects can contribute to regional development. Thus, this paper aims to identify similarities of socio-spatial behavior existing among the municipalities of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, based on census data, and to evaluate the changes that have occurred over the years. For this, a cluster analysis of the municipalities was performed before some indicators. With the clusters was verified the existence of difference in the behavior between the groups through non-parametric tests and thematic maps were created that bring the behavior of the regions in a spatial way. Five clusters of municipalities were detected in 1991 and four clusters in the years 2000 and 2010. It is also noticeable the socio-spatial development over the years. However in 2010 is when the greatest evolution occurs for most municipalities. From the generated clusters it is possible to outline public policy strategies and further prioritize the measures that should be taken by the competent bodies in each of the regions studied.
Downloads
References
ALONSO JAF, BENETTI MD, BANDEIRA PS. Crescimento econômico da região sul do Rio Grande do Sul: causas e perspectivas. Edições FEE, 1984 [Internet]: Porto Alegre: http://cdn.fee.tche.br/digitalizacao/crescimento-economico-regiao-sul-rio-grande-do-sul-causas-perspectivas/crescimento-economico-regiao-sul-rio-grande-do-sul-causas-perspectivas-texto.pdf
ATLAS BRASIL; Atlas do desenvolvimento humano – Rio Grande do Sul. Disponível em: http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/pt/perfil_uf/rio-grande-do-sul. Acesso em: 10/10/2017.
CARGNIN AP, BERTÊ AMA, LEMOS BO, OLIVEIRA SB. Quinze anos de transformações na economia e sociedade
gaúchas contados pelas páginas do atlas socioeconômico do RS. Boletim Geográfico do Rio Grande do Sul. 2014; 24:29-62
CASTRO LS, MIRANDA MH, LIMA JE. Indicadores sociais de desenvolvimento e a produção de soja: uma análise multivariada nos 150 maiores municípios produtores brasileiros. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional. 2015;11(1):69-87.
CHARRAD M, GHAZZALI N, BOITEAU V, NIKNAFS A. NbClust: An R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. Journal of Statistical Software. 2014;61(6):1-36.
CONCHA M., WAQUIL PD, SCHNEIDER S. Tipologia dos municípios gaúchos com base nos dados dos Censos Agropecuários de 2006 e Censo demográfico de 2010. Ensaios FEE. 2013;34:938-1006.
CRISPIM DL, FERNANDES, LL, ALBUQUERQUE RLO. Aplicação de técnica estatística multivariada em indicadores de sustentabilidade nos municípios do Marajó-PA. Revista Principia. 2019; 46:145-154.
DINNO A. dunn.test: Dunn's Test of Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. R package version 1.3.5., 2017. Disponível em: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dunn.test.
IPEA. Situação Social nos Estados – Rio Grande do Sul. 2012. Disponível em: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/situacao_social/120131_relatorio_situacaosocial_rs.pdf.
JANNUZZI PM. Indicadores Sociais no Brasil. 5 st ed. Campinas, São Paulo: Editora Alínea; 2012.
LEITE GB, BRIGATTE H, AGUILAR EB. Analise Multivariada de Indicadores Socioeconomicos dos Países do G-20. Revista de Economia Mackenzie. 2009;7(1):125-147.
OKSANEN J, BLANCHET FG, FRIENDLY M, KINDT R, LEGENFRE P. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-2, 2018.https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
OSSANI PC, CIRILLO MA. MVar. Pt: Analise Multivariada. R package version 2.0.1, 2018.
PONTES RP, LIMA JE. Índice de desenvolvimento econômico das famílias no Rio Grande do Sul: Uma abordagem por intermédio da análise multivariada. Estudo & Debate. 2018;25(1):237-260.
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Áustria. Disponível em: https://www.R-project.org/.
SCHNEIDER S, WAQUIL PD. Caracterização socioeconômica dos munícipios gaúchos e desigualdades regionais. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural. 2001;39(3):117-142.
SILVA MMD, SILVA AM, SEIDEL EJ, MATEUS ALSS, ANSUJ AP. Agrupamento Socioeconômico de Municípios do Rio Grande do Sul. In: Anais da 64 Rbras e 18 SEAGRO. 2019; Cuiaba, Brasil.
TRENNEPOHL D, PAIVA CAN. Contribuição potencial de atividades agropecuárias selecionadas para o desenvolvimento regional do Noroeste gaúcho. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento. 2012;8(1):232-268.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
