Use of Doppler Sodar in atmospheric measurements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X36911Abstract
O uso do Sodar Doppler tem trazido avanços significativos ao entendimento dos processos de camada limite atmosférica. Estes instrumentos têm demonstrado suas habilidades em um grande número de estudos, tais como circulações de brisa marítima/terrestre, escoamento em terrenos complexos, ondas de gravidade, jatos de baixos níveis e sistemas frontais, além de possibilitar estimativas quantitativas de parâmetros de turbulência tais como fluxo de calor sensível, balanço de energia cinética turbulenta, função estrutura de temperatura e a determinação da altura da camada de mistura.
Neste trabalho, o princípio de funcionamento de diferentes tipos de Sodar, suas habilidades e limitações na instalação desses instrumentos são apresentados. No final, alguns fenômenos detectados por um Sodar Doppler do tipo “phased-array”, recentemente adquirido pelo IAG-USP, são apresentados.Downloads
References
DT 94/003: Remtech Doppler Sodar Operating Manual. PA1, PA2, PA3 DELL PC compatible based systems.
Kalogiros, J. A., C. G. Helmis, D. N. Asimakopoulos and P. G. Papageorgas, 1999: Estimation fo ABL Parameters Using the Vertical Velocity Measurements of an Acoustic Sounder. Bound.-Layer Meteor. 91, 413-449.
Little, C. G., 1969: Acoustic methods for the remote probing of the lower atmosphere. Proc. IEEE, 57, 571-578.
Nair, K. N., P. K. Kunrikrishnan, K. S. Gupta and R. Ramachadran, 1989: Sudy of vertical wind and temperature turbulence in a convective boudary layer from Sodar observation at Thumba. Indian Journal of Radio & Space Physics, 18, 157-159.
_____, 1999: On Low Level Jet at Coastal Station Thumba. Indian Journal of Radio & Space Physics, 28, 55-59.
Patra, A. K., U. K De and D. Lohar, 1998: Existence of low level jet during premonsoon period over eastern india and its role in the initiation of nocturnal thunderstorms. Atmósfera. 12, 15-26.
Ralph, F. M., C. Mazaudier, M. Crochet and S. V. Venkateswaran, 1993: Doppler Sodar and Radar Wind-Profiler Observations of Gravity-Wave Activity Associated with a Gravity Current. Mon. Wea. Rev. 121, 444-463.
Singal, S. P., B. S. Gera, and S. K. Aggarwal, 1982: Determination of structure parameters using sodar. Bound.-Layer Meteor. 23, 105-114.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.