The generalized discrete Half-Normal distribution: an alternative distribution for analysing count data
Keywords:Discretization, Generalized Half-Normal Distribution, Method of moments, Monte Carlo simulation, Likelihood
AbstractIn general, data that are obtained by counting processes, strictly discrete or discretized (from truncations and/or rounding), are analyzed, without exhaustion, by the Geometric, Logarithmic, Poisson and Negative Binomial distributions. In recent years a large number of discrete distributions have been proposed in the literature from the discretization of continuous random variables. Many of the discretization methods preserve one or more characteristics of the continuous version, with the proposal of Nakagawa e Osaki (1975) being the most used. In this paper, from this methodology, which makes use of the survival function, we propose the discrete version of the continuous generalized Half-Normal distribution, introduced in the literature by Cooray e Ananda (2008). Some of its properties are discussed and Monte Carlo simulations evaluate the bias and accuracy of the estimates obtained by the maximum likelihood method and method of moments. Some discrete data sets found in the literature are considered to illustrate the applicability of the proposed distribution.
Aghababaei Jazi, M., Lai, C. D., Hossein Alamatsaz, M. (2010). A discrete inverse Weibull distribution and estimation of its parameters. Statistical Methodology, 7, 121–132.
Almalki, S. J., Nadarajah, S. (2014). A new discrete modified Weibull distribution. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 63(1), 68–80.
Bakouch, H. S., Jazi, M. A., Nadarajah, S. (2014). A new discrete distribution. Statistics, 48(1), 200–240.
Bracquemond, C., Gaudoin, O. (2003). A survey on discrete lifetime distributions. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering, 10(1), 69–98.
Chakraborty, S. (2015). Generating discrete analogues of continuous probability distributions - A survey of methods and constructions. Journal of Statistical Distributions and Applications, 1(1), 1–30.
Chakraborty, S., Chakravarty, D. (2012). Discrete gamma distributions: Properties and parameter estimations. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 41(18), 3301–3324.
Chakraborty, S., Chakravarty, D. (2014). A discrete Gumbel distribution. arXiv preprint arXiv:14107568.
Collett, D. (2003). Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research, 2 o edn. Chapaman and Hall, New York.
Cooray, K., Ananda, M. M. A. (2008). A generalization of the Half-Normal distribution with applications to lifetime data. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 37(9), 1323–1337.
Cox, D. R., Snell, E. J. (1968). A general definition of residuals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological), 30(2), 248–275.
Ghosh, T., Roy, D., Chandra, N. K. (2013). Reliability approximation through the discretization of random variables using reversed hazard rate function. International Journal of Mathematical, Computational, Statistical, Natural and Physical Engineering, 7(4), 96 – 100.
Gómez-Déniz, E., Calderín-Ojeda, E. (2011). The discrete Lindley distribution: properties and applications. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 81(11), 1405–1416.
Good, I. J. (1953). The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika, 40(3-4), 237–264.
Hussain, T., Ahmad, M. (2014). Discrete inverse Rayleigh distribution. Pak J Statist, 30(2), 203–222.
Kemp, A. W. (2004). Classes of discrete lifetime distributions. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 33(12), 3069–3093.
Khan, M., Khalique, A., Abouammoh, A. (1989). On estimating parameters in a discrete Weibull distribution. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 38, 348–350.
Klein, J. P., Moeschberger, M. L. (1997). Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Krishna, H., Pundir, P. S. (2007). Discrete Maxwell distribution. Interstat.
Krishna, H., Pundir, P. S. (2009). Discrete Burr and discrete pareto distributions. Statistical Methodology, 6(2), 177–188.
Lai, C. D. (2013). Issues concerning constructions of discrete lifetime models. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 10(2), 251–262.
Lawless, J. F. (2003). Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data, 2 o edn. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Lee, E. T., Wang, J. W. (2003). Statistical Methods for Survival Data Analysis, 3 o edn. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons], Hoboken, NJ.
Mazucheli, J., Dey, S. (2018). Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the generalized Half-Normal distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 88(6), 1027–1038.
Mazucheli, J., Oliveira, R. P., Peralta, D., Emanuelli, I. P. (2018). Application of discrete Burr XII distribution in the analysis of animal production data. Ciência & Natura, 40(1), 1–10.
Nakagawa, T., Osaki, S. (1975). The discrete Weibull distribution. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-24(5), 300–301.
Oliveira, R. P., Mazucheli, J., Achcar, J. A. (2017). A comparative study between two discrete Lindley distributions. Ciência & Natura, 39(3), 539–552.
Pearson, K. (1895). Contributions to the mathematical theory of evolution. ii. skew variation in homogeneous material. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A, 186, 343–414.
Roy, D., Dasgupta, T. (2001). A discretizing approach for evaluating reliability of complex systems under stress-strength model. IEEE transactions on reliability, 50(2), 145–150.
Stein, W. E., Dattero, R. (1984). A new discrete Weibull distribution. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 33(2), 196–197.
How to Cite
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.