Development of a system for recommendation of calage and fodder for grain crops
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35533Abstract
The recommendations of liming and fertilization for the different crops in the main producing regions of the country are based on the knowledge generated by researchers in the area of soil science. Interpretation tables for nutrient contents in the soil and tables with the amount of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were elaborated for the different manuals published in some states / regions. Under the name of AGROFERT, a WEB system was created that aims to integrate the information of the correction and fertilizer recommendation systems for the states of Rio Grande do Sul / Santa Catarina and Paraná for the main grain crops and to evaluate the evolution of the characteristics of the soil. The system has a consistent scientific basis, allowing for more comprehensive recommendations that can be continually improved. To date, different existing computerized recommendation systems are specific to a single state / region and provide simpler information. The Agrofert system saves time, since its use does not require calculating, correcting and writing recommendations by the traditional method (Manual)
Downloads
References
RABELLO LM, INAMASSU RY, BERNARDI ACC. Sistema de medição de condutividade elétrica. Circular técnica. 2010; 54: 01-02.
MOLIN JP, RABELLO LM. Estudo sobre a mensuração da condutividade elétrica do solo. Eng. Agri. Jaboticabal. 2011; 31(90-101): 90-91.
BECKER E. A: A tecnologia da informação aplicada à produção de alimentos. Ver. Eletr. Unifebe. [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 ago 10]; 7(7): 231-232. Available from: http://periodicos.unifebe.edu.br/index.php/revistaeletronicadaunifebe/article/viewFile/532/297.
CAMARGO MS. A importância do uso de fertilizantes para o meio ambiente. Pesquisa & Tecnologia. 2012; 9(2): 01-03.
GUBIANI PI, SILVA LS, REINERT DJ, REICHERT JM. CADUB GHF- um programa computacional para cálculo da quantidade de fertilizantes e corretivos da acidez do solo para culturas produtoras de grãos hortaliças e forrageiras. Ciência Rural. 2007; 37(4): 1161-1165.
SANTIAGO AD, ROSSETTO R: Árvore do conhecimento cana de açúcar [Internet]. Agencia Embrapara de Informação Tecnológica. Available from: http://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.r/gestor/cana-de-acaucar/arvore/CONTAG01 3471120051717.html.http://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/gestor/cana-de-acucar/arvore/CONTAG01_34_711200516717.html
SILVA, L. da S. et al. Manual de calagem e adubação para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Núcleo Regional Sul, Comissão de Química e Fertilidade do Solo, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
