Application of educational resource recommendation techniques on a university campus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X75195Keywords:
Recommendation Systems, Smart Campus, Collaborative Filtering, Content-based Filtering, Hybrid SystemAbstract
The development of the Internet over the years has brought with it a massive increase in the amount of data present on the network, making the search for specific items a slow and complex task. Thus, tools have emerged with the goal of filtering information within websites and platforms, leaving aside everything that is irrelevant and providing the user with only what is likely to interest them. These tools are called recommendation systems. In addition, the field of education has also been affected by the problem of data overload, especially in recent years with the popularization of online education, where students demand new methods of research and learning beyond the classroom. Therefore, the objective of this article is to develop a personalized recommendation system for educational resources that, based on users' interests, makes predictions and generates lists of items that match their interests. It is also hoped that this platform can help in the integration and development of intelligent university campuses.
Downloads
References
Abouabdellah, A. Benfares, C., & elIdrissi, Y. E. B. (2017). Recommendation semantic of services in smart city. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Part F129474.
Abualnaaj, K., Ahmed, V., & Saboor, S. (n.d.). A Strategic Framework for Smart Campus. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dubai, UAE, March 10-12, 2020
Chun-Mei, L., Jie-Teng, J., Shuo, D., Wei, P., Yan, Q., & Yi-Han, M. (2021). Personalized Recommendation Algorithm for books and its implementation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1738(1).
Dennouni, N., Lancieri, L., Peter, Y., & Slama, Z. (2018). Towards an incremental recommendation of POIs for mobile tourists without profiles. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 10(10), 42–52.
Eliyas, S., & Ranjana, P. (2022). Recommendation Systems: Content-Based Filtering vs Collaborative Filtering. 2022 2nd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering, ICACITE 2022, 1360–1365.
Imbar, R. V., Langi, A. Z. R., & Supangkat, S. H. (2020, November 19). Smart Campus Model: A Literature Review. 7th International Conference on ICT for Smart Society: AIoT for Smart Society, ICISS 2020 - Proceeding.
Jordán, J., Botti, V., Turró, C., & Valero, S. (2021). Using a hybrid recommending system for learning videos in flipped classrooms and moocs. Electronics (Switzerland), 10(11).
Karlgren, J. (1990). An Algebra for Recommendations An Algebra for Recommendations Using Reader Data as a Basis for Measuring Document Proximity.
Khan, N. Z. A., & Mahalakshmi, R. (2020). A novel user review-based contextual recommender system. International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing.
Meng, H., & Cheng, Y. (2021). Research on Key Technologies of Intelligent Recommendation Based Online Education Platform in Big Data Environment. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 638–645.
Mrhar, K., & Abik, M. (2019). Toward a deep recommender system for MOOCs platforms. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 173–177.
Thannimalai, V., & Zhang, L. (2021). A CONTENT BASED AND COLLABORATIVE FILTERING RECOMMENDER SYSTEM. Proceedings - International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2021-December.
Xu, X., Wang, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Teaching performance evaluation in smart campus. IEEE Access, 6, 77754–77766.
Zhang, Y., Dong, Z. Y., Lu, E., & Yip, C. (2022). A Systematic Review on Technologies and Applications in Smart Campus: A Human-Centered Case Study. In IEEE Access (Vol. 10, pp. 16134–16149).
Zheng, K., Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Yang, X., & Zheng, X. (2020). Collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm based on variational inference. International Journal of Crowd Science, 4(1), 31–44.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
