School environment analysis: Doutor Liberato Salzano Vieira da Cunha State School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X35499Keywords:
Educational equipment, Cachoeira do Sul, Virtual three-dimensional spatial analysisAbstract
The Architectural Design 5 course in the Architecture and Urbanism Undergraduate Program of the Federal University of Santa Maria, Cachoeira do Sul Campus (state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) contemplates, in the first half of 2018, the design of an educational urban equipment. The architectural design developed by the students is preceded by the critical analysis of architectural projects of educational institutions. For this purpose, technical visits were made to the “Doutor Liberato Salzano Vieira da Cunha” State School, located in the city of Cachoeira do Sul. The technical visit enabled data collection and the understanding of the influence of the built space in the users’ daily life. The analysis particularly considered the following aspects: urban insertion, social and cultural contexts, the building’s plastic and volumetric solutions, internal spaces solution, existing architectural program and flow organization. The methodology used for exposing the results to the other classmates included, besides ancillary resources, the design of an electronic model that helps understanding the space and the architectural particularities of the building. The objective of this work is to present the analysis and the results obtained from the technical visit, to contextualize the School in the educational reality of Cachoeira do Sul, in addition to specifying particularities of the methodology of analysis and presentation.
Downloads
References
FISCHER, V. L. B. Ambiente escolar, usuários e contexto urbano. In: XI ENTAC Encontro Nacional de Tecnologia no Ambiente Construído: A Construção do Futuro. Anais... Florianópolis, SC: ENTAC, 2006.
GIL, A. C. Como Elaborar Projetos de Pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Editora Atlas S.A., 2002. ISBN 8522431698.
KOWALTOWSKI, D. C. C. K. Conceitos e Tendências da Arquitetura Escolar. São Paulo, SP: Oficina de Textos, 2011. 272 p. ISBN: 9788579751103.
MCDONALD, J. P. Redesigning Schools: Lessons for the 21st Century. The Jossey-Bass Education Series. São Francisco, EUA: ERIC, 1996.
SOPHIA, P. A construção da surpresa. Revista Educação, seção entrevistas/dossiê, setembro de 2011. Disponível em: <http://www.revistaeducacao.com.br/a-construcao-da-surpresa/>. Acesso em 4 abril 2018.
TEIXEIRA, A. Pensamento e ação. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Civilização Brasileira, 1960.
YIN, R. K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 2. ed. Tradução: Daniel Grassi. Porto Alegre, RS: Bookman, 2001. ISBN: 85-7307-852-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
