Water potability of artisian wells: diagnosis of sample from the counties of Rio Grande do Sul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X34656Keywords:
Potable water, Analyze, Quality parametersAbstract
Drinking water is all water for consumption. It must have certain amount of dissolved minerals, be free of toxic materials and micro-organisms. It is considered an indispensable resource for man. One of the main problems for the use of water is related to its contamination, that is, this resource has been polluted in such a way that it can no longer consume it in its natural state. However, despite all the efforts to store and reduce its consumption, it is becoming scarce and its quality deteriorates faster and faster. In this way, groundwater has become an important alternative for water supply to communities. Considering the relevance of this theme, this study seeks to make a diagnosis of the water quality of artesian wells of the Central Region of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, in order to prove the potability. For these determinations the experimental procedures were: determination of the pH value; turbidity; temperature; total solids dissolved; color; hardness and residual iron concentration. The evaluation of the results obtained in this study was based on the standards of potability established in Ordinance No. 2,914, of December 12, 2011, of the Ministry of Health, which establishes the procedures for control and surveillance of water quality for human consumption and its standard of potability.Downloads
References
ABRAMOVICH B., CARRERA E., LURÁ M.C. & HAYE M.A. 1998. Cryptosporidium y agua: estudio de una asociación riesgosa. Ingeniería Sanitaria y Ambiental 36:30-34.
AZEVEDO, E. B. Poluição vs. Tratamento de Água: duas faces da mesma moeda. Química e Sociedade, São Paulo, nº 10, nov. 1999.
BRAGA, B. Introdução à Engenharia Ambiental. 2 ed. São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria Nº 518, de 25 de março de 2004. Estabelece os procedimentos e responsabilidades relativos ao controle e vigilância da qualidade da água para consumo humano e seu padrão de potabilidade, e dá outras providências.
BRASIL. Resolução CONAMA Nº 357, de 17 de março de 2005. Dispõe sobre a classificação dos corpos de água e diretrizes ambientais para o seu enquadramento, bem como estabelece as condições e padrões de lançamento de efluentes, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da República federativa do Brasil, Brasília, Seção 1, p. 58-63. 2005.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria Nº 2.914, de 12 de dezembro de 2011. Dispõe sobre os procedimentos de controle e de vigilância da qualidade da água para consumo humano e seu padrão de potabilidade. Diário Oficial da União 2011; 14 dez.
CAMPOS, J. A. D. B.; FARACHE FILHO, A.; FARIA, J. B. Uso de reservatórios domiciliares e conhecimento da população. Rev. Alim. Nutr., v. 14, n. 2, p. 171- 175, 2003.
Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente - CONAMA. Resoluções do Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Ministérios do Meio Ambiente. Brasília/DF, 2006.
GRASSI, M. T. As águas do planeta Terra. Cadernos Temáticos de Química Nova na Escola. São Paulo, ed. especial, maio, 2001.
HIRATA, R. O que é um poço artesiano. Revista Super Interessante, São Paulo, set. 2002.
MACÊDO, J. A. B. de. Métodos Laboratoriais de Análises Físico-Químicas e Microbiológicas. 2 ed. Belo Horizonte - MG: MACÊDO, 2003.
RIGHES, A. A.; BURIOL, G. A.; BOER, N. Água e Educação - Princípios e estratégias de uso e conservação. Santa Maria: Paula Schoenfeldt Patta, 2009.
ROCHA, T. C.; ROSA, A. H.; CARDOSO, A. A. Introdução à química ambiental. Porto Alegre: Bookmam, 2004.
SCURACCHIO, P. A. Qualidade da água utilizada em escolas do município de São Carlos-SP. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade Estadual Paulista, 2010.
SILVA R. C. A.; ARAÚJO T. M. Qualidade da água do manancial subterrâneo em áreas urbanas de Feira de Santana (BA). Ciência e Saúde Coletiva, 8 (4): 1019:1028, 2003.
SIQUEIRA, G.W.; APRILE, F.; MIGUÉIS, A.M. Diagnóstico da qualidade da água do rio Parauapebas (Pará – Brasil). Acta Amazônica. v. 42, n. 3, p. 413 – 422, 2012.
SOTO, F. R. M.; FONSECA, Y. S. K; RISSSETO, M.; AZEVEDO, S. S. de. ARINO, M. L. B; RIBAS, M. A.; MOURA, C. R.V.; MACHETTE, D. S. Monitoramento da qualidade da água de poços rasos de escolas públicas da zona rural do Município de Ibiúna/SP: parâmetros microbiológicos, físico-químicos e fatores de risco ambiental. Ver. Inst. Adolfo Lutz. v. 65, n. 2, 2006, p. 106-111.
SOUZA, L. C. de. Águas e sua proteção. 1° ed. (ano 2004), 4° tir. Curitiba: JURUÁ, 2008.
VENDRAME, A. C. Perícia Ambiental - Uma abordagem Multidisciplinar. São Paulo: IOB Thomson, 2006.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
