Análise e previsão da série recebimento e produção de leite da usina escola de laticínios da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria - RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27234Keywords:
Milk, Forecast, Planing in short time, Regression AnalysisAbstract
The world globalization bring to the market and to thebusiness class a great phase of adaptation and search for new
technologies to guaranty the quality of its products. The statistics is
a useful tool to help to maintain the quality in a process or service.
This way is possible to reduce costs and maintain the clients satisfied.
The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the relationship between the milk received and the milk processed in the Usina de Laticínios de Santa Maria to forecast the next value. The data were daily collected since may/2002 till jul/2002 in a total of 83 observations, and were analyzed using the dynamic regression analysis. The results obtained was possible to forecast and better plan the production of milk received to be processed. That way the manager can accept or reject a new orders and can make a new strategies to avoid difficulties in a short term.
Downloads
References
BACCHI, Miriam. R. P. Previsão de preços de bovino, suíno e frango com modelos de séries temporais. Tese de Doutorado. Piracicaba: ESALQ, 1994. 173p.
DAVIDSON, J. H., D. H., HENDRY, F. Srba e . Yco. Econometric
Modelling of the Aggregate Time-Series Relationship Between
Consumers Expenditure and Income in the United Kingdom. The Economic Journal. v. 88, p. 661-692, 1978.
DICKEY, David A., FULLER, Wayne A. Likelihood ratio statistcs for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econométrica, v.49, n.4, p.1057-72, July 1981.
ENGLE, Robert F. e GRANGER, C. W. J. Cointegration and error
correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometric, 55(2):251-76 1987.
YOO, Byung S. Forecasting and testing in co-integrateal
systems. Journal of Econometrics, North-Holland, v.35, n.1, p.143-59, 1987.
ENGLE, Robert F.; GRANGER, C. W. J. Long-run economic
relationship: readings in cointegration. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991. 301p. (Advanced texts in econometrics).
FERREIRA, Afonso H. B. Testes de cointegração e um modelo de correção de erro para a balança comercial brasileira. Estudos Econômicos, São Paulo, v.23, n.1, p.35-65, jan./abr. 1993.
FULLER, Wayne A. Introduction to statistical time series. New York: John Wiley, 1976. 352p.
GRANGER, Clive W. J. Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification. Journal of Econometrics, North-Holland, v.16, n.1, p.121-30, May 1981.
GUJARATI, D. N. Econometria Básica. São Paulo: Makron Books, 2000.
HARRIS, Richard I.D. Cointegration analysis in econometric modelling. London: Prentice Hall, 1995. 176p
HILL, R. Carter, GRIFFITHS, W.E., JUDGE, G.G. Econometria. São Paulo: Saraiva, 1999.
MACKINNON, James G. Critical values for cointegration tests. In: ENGLE, Robert F.; GRANGER, W. J. Long-run economic relationships: readings in cointegration. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991. p.267 -76.
MAKRIDAKIS, S., WHEELWRIGHT, S. C. e HYNDMAN, R. J.
Forecasting: methods and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998.
VASCONCELOS, M. A. S. e Alves, D. Manual de Econometria. São Paulo: Atlas, 2000. 308 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
