Aspectos florístico e estrutural de um fragmento de floresta com araucária utilizado para o pastoreio de bovinos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X27226Keywords:
Fragment forest, Araucarian Forest, Mixed Ombrophylous ForestAbstract
The aim of this paper was to know, analyze and describe the floristic composition of the shrub and tree component and the structure of a Montane Mixed Ombrophylous Forest Fragment, used for bovines pasturage, in the municipal district of Criúva - RS. It was inventoried 533 individuous in seven 10 x 100 m plots with DBH³ 10 em, distributed in 38 species from 33 gender and 20 families. The families wich presented the widest number of individuous were: Myrtaceae (33,0 %), Euphorbiaceae (19,7 %) e Araucariaceae (17,4 %). The total density found was 761,4 individuous/ha, and the medium DBH is 22,9 em and the higest 9,7 m. The part of the forest investigated is characterized by the lack of understorey, probably caused by intense presence of cattle, damaging especially plants of minor height and diameter. This fact might explain the lack of individuais to occupy the gaps caused by the removal of dominant trees out of the forest.Downloads
References
DURIGAN, M.E. Florística, dinâmica e análise proteica de uma Floresta Ombrófila Mista em São João do Triunfo - PR. Curitiba: UFPR, 1999. 125p. (Dissertação de Mestrado em Engenharia Florestal - Universidade Federal do Paraná).
EMBRAPA - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Levantamento de reconhecimento dos solos do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Recife: Ministério da Agricultura, 1973. 431 p. (Boletim Técnico, 30).
HOSOKAWA, R.T.; MOURA, J.B.; CUNHA, U.S. Introdução ao manejo e economia de florestas. Curitiba: EdUFPR, 1998. 162p.
IBGE - Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Manual técnico da vegetação brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1992. 132p.
JARENKOW, J. A.; BAPTISTA, L.R.M. Composição florística e estrutura da Mata com Araucária na Estação Ecológica de Aracuri, Esmeralda, RS. Napaea, n.3, p.9-18, 1987.
KENT, M.; COKER, P. Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. London, Blackwell, 1992. 363p.
KLEIN, R.M. Ecologia da flora e vegetação do Vale do Itajaí. Sellowia, Itajai, n.31, p.103-164, 1979.
KOEHLER, A.; PÉLLlCO-NETTO, S.; SANQUETTA, C.R. Análise da estrutura de uma Floresta Ombrófila Mista semidevastada, Fazenda Gralha Azul, Região Metropolitana de Curitiba, com implicações ao manejo. Rev. Acadêmica, Curitiba, n.1, p.37-60, 1998.
LAMPRECHT, H. Ensayo sobre la estrutura flotistica de la parte sur - oriental del bosque universitario "El Caimital", Estado Barinas. Rev. For. Venezolana, Mérida, v.7, n.10/11, p.77-119, 1964.
LONGHI, S.J. A estrutura de uma floresta natural de Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze, no sul do Brasil. Curitiba: UFPR, 1980. 198p. Dissertação (Dissertação de Mestrado em Engenharia Florestal - Universidade Federal do Paraná).
MATTEUCCI, S. D.; COLMA, A. Metodologia para el estudio de la
vegetacíon. Washington: The General Secretarial of the Organization of American States, 1982. 167p. (Série Biologia. Monografia, 22).
MORENO, J.A. Clima do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: Secretaria de Agricultura, 1961. 42p.
NEGRELLE, R.A.B.; SILVA, F.C. da. Fitossociologia de um trecho de floresta com Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze. no município de Caçador - SC. BoI. Pesq. Florestal. Colombo, n.24/25, p.37-54, 1992.
NEGRELLE, R.A.B.; SILVA, F.C. da. Fitossociologia de um trecho de floresta com Araucaria angustifolia (Bert.) O. Ktze. no município de Caçador - SC. BoI. Pesq. Florestal. Colombo, n.24/25, p.37-54, 1992.
OLlVEIRA. Y,M.M.; ROTTA, E. Levantamento da estrutura horizontal de uma mata de araucária no primeiro planalto paranaense. Bol. Pesq. Florestal. Colombo, n.4, p.1-45, 1982.
REVISTA DA MADEIRA. Rio Grande do Sul registra aumento de nativas. Curitiba: Associação Brasileira de Produtores de Madeira, n.57, p.40-42, 2001.
SANQUETTA, C.R.; DALLA-CORTE, S. Composição florística, estrutura e dinâmica de um fragmento florestal com Araucaria angustifolia no sudoeste paranaense. Rev. Acadêmica, Curitiba, n.1, p.3-28, 1998.
SCHNEIDER, P.R.; GALVÃO, F.; LONGHI, S.J. Influência do pisoteio de bovinos em áreas florestais. Floresta, Curitiba, v.9, n.1, p.19-23, 1978.
SHEPHERD, G.J. FITOPAC 1: manual do usuário. Campinas: UNICAMP. Departamento de Botânica, 1994. 9p.
SOLÓRZANO-FILHO, J.A; KRAUS, J.E. Uma breve história das Matas de Araucária. Eco 21: Rio de Janeiro, n.48, p.37-40, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
