Leukocyte, erythrocyte, hemoglobin concentration, hemotocrit and bleding cotting counter by prolonged oral and intraperitonial used of Heterothalamus brunioides in Wistar rats
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X25466Abstract
In the present work, authors wished to observe possible blood alterations produced by oral route (98 mg/kg weight) and intraperitonial route (40 mg/kg and 98/kg weight) proIonged administrations of Heterothalamus brunioides, Less in Wistar rats. Results analysis proved that, in the estudied paramethers, was no significant alterations.
Downloads
References
AZZOLlN, E.L.C., SIMOES, S.R.M. and CHAGAS, A.M. – Métodos de Avaliação do Tempo de Coagulação Sanguínea em Ratos Wistar. 2ª Jornada de Clínica Médica de Santa Maria, RS, 1986.
BAUMGARTNER, R. and LABER, G. – Haematologische untersuchunger biratten mit experimenteller myhoplasma polyarthritis. Zentralberl Babesial parastenkd infektionshr. Hyg Abt I Reihe A, 232: 105-12, 1975.
BRASIL, O.V. FRANCESCHI, J.P. and WAISBICH, E. – Pharmacology of crystalline crotoxim I. toxicity. Men Inst Butantan Simp Intermac, 33:973-980, 1966.
CHAGAS, A.M. SALDANHA, C. and OLIVEIRA, P.R. - Leucometria, Eritrometria e os Teores Plasmáticos de Sódio, de Potássio e de Cálcio, Após o uso prolongado de Ramaria flavo brunnescens em Ratos. Rev. Centro Ciências Rurais, 10(4), 299-306, 1980.
CRESKOFF, A.J., FRITZ-HUGH, T. JR and FARRIS, E.J. – Hematology of the Rat and Standards in "The Rat in laboratory investigation" (E.J. FARRIS and J.Q. GRIFFITHS, eds) pp. 406-420, lipincott. Philadelphia, Pensylvania, 1949.
FISHER, A. - Laboratório de Análises Clinicas, 6ª ed, Buenos Aires, Editora E1 Ateneo, 1954, 246 p.
FONTANA, F. - Traité sur le Vénin de la Vipere sur les Poisons Americaine sur le Lausier Gerise et sur Quelques autres Paisons Vegetalau x, Vol I and III Firinze, 178l.
HEBOLD, V. G. and BLEUEL, H. - Hamatologische standard werte beider weiblichen und mamlichen ratte (Sprague Dawley). Z. Versuchstierkd, 13: 316-320, 1971.
HOEHNE, F.C. - Plantas e substâncias vegetais tóxicas e medicinais. São Paulo, graphcars, 1939, 352 p.
HULSE, E.V. - Quantitative cell counts of the bone marrow and blood their secular variations in the normal adult rat. Acta Haematol . 31:50-63,1964.
JONES, R.A., JENKINS, L.J. JR., COON, R.A. and SIEGEL, J. – Effect of long-term continuous inhalation of ozone on experimental animals. Toxicol: appe Pharmacol, 17: 189-202, 1970.
KOSMA, C. K., WEISBROTH, S. H., STRATMAN, S. L. and CONEJEROS, M. - Normal Biologic valus for long. Evans rats Lab anim. Care, 19:746-55, 1969.
LACERDA, F. - Are Museu Nac. Rio de Janeiro. Ed. Guanabara, 1978, 202 p.
OHSAKA, A. - Hemorragic Necrotizing and Edema: Forming effects of Snake Venouns. Chapter 14, Washington Mac Graw Hill, 1975, 503 p.
POLLARD, C. B. - Venon Research Ghallenge to Various sciences in Venouns. ed. by E. E. Buchey and N, porges publication 44. Am Assoc. Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C. 1956, 5-8 p.
RINGLER, D. H. and DABICH, L. - Hematologic and clinical, Biochemistray. The Laboratory Rat, 1:105-121, 1979.
ROSENFELD, G. - Symptomalogy, Pathology and Tratament of snake bites in South America. In venouns animals and their venouns. Vol II, New York academic pres. 1971, Biochemistray. The Laboratory Rat, 105-121,1979.
SCHALM, O. W., JAIN, N.C. and CARROLL, E.J. - Veterinary Hematology. 3rd ed Lia and Fihger, Philadelfia, Pensylvania,1975, 278;1.
SCHERMAN, H. - Comparative Profilis of Various Strains of Rats Used in long - term juding Studies. Lab anim. Care, 13:793-807, 1963.
SNEDECOR, G.W. and COCHRAN, V.G. - Two or more Randon samples of measurement data. Analysis of variance in: Statistical Universyte Press, 1956. cap 10, p. 246-247.
SWAROOP, A., GRAB, M. and OHSAKA, A. – Hemorragic Necrotizing and Edema-Forming Effects of Snake Venouns. Chapter 14. Washington Mac Graw Hill, 1975, 503 p.
VONDRUSKA, J.F. and GRECO, R.A. - Certaim hematologic and blood chemical values em charles river C D Albino Rats. Bull, Am Soc. Vet. Clin. Pathol, 2: 3 - 7, 1 973 .
WALKER, A. I. I., STEVENSON, D. E. ROBINSON, J.; THORPE, E. and ROBERTS, M. - The toxicity and pharmacodynamics of dieldrim (Hedd), Toxical., appe. Pharmacol, 15:345-373, 1969.
WORDEN, A., NOEL, P.R.B., MAWDESLEY, T.L.E., PALMER, A.K. and FLETCHER, M.A. - Teading studies on lenacil in the rat and dog. Toxicol., appe. Pharmacol, 27: 215-224, 1974.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
