Subjectivity in the Second Wittgenstein
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378666486Keywords:
Subjectivity, Behaviour, WittgensteinAbstract
This writing contains the criticisms of traditional notions of subjectivity made by the thus called Second Wittgenstein, whose thought expresses mainly in the Philosophical Investigations. As Wittgenstein himself recommends, the parts of his second thought will be faced up to his first formulations about the “subject”, that had close relation with the notion of subject in Schopenhauer. After we approach briefly Tractatus’s conception of subject, we will present three aspects of Wittgensteinian critique of subjectivity since his Investigations. After that, we will comment two attempts to extract a positive formulation of subjectivity in Wittgenstein, made by Chantal Bax and Søren Overgaard. Beyond exposing the negative, or critical, aspecto f Wittgenstein’s formulations about subjectivity, we intend to answer if the subject and subjectivity, for the Second Wittgenstein, can be known, and if it is possible to extract a positive formulation of subjectivity of wittgensteinian writings.
Downloads
References
BAKER, G. P.; HACKER, P. M. S. Wittgenstein: rules, grammar and necessity. Volume 2 of an analytical commentary on the Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: B. Blackwell, 1992.
BAX, C. Subjectivity after Wittgenstein: the post-Cartesian subject and the “death of man”. Londres: Continuum, 2011.
JANIK, A.; TOULMIN, S. A Viena de Wittgenstein. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1991.
MAGALHÃES, T. DE O. Sobre certas dissimilaridades entre as Investigações filosóficas de Wittgenstein e o behaviorismo radical de Skinner. Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN), v. 24, n. 43, p. 175-225, 19 maio 2017.
OLIVEIRA, W. T. Pensamento e Subjetividade em Wittgenstein. Analytica. Revista de Filosofia, 22(1), 141-164, 2019.
OVERGAARD, S. Exposing the conjuring trick: Wittgenstein on subjectivity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3: 263–286, 2004.
RACINE, T.; SLANEY, K. A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Use of Conceptual Analysis in Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
SCHOPENHAUER, A. O Mundo como vontade e como representação. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2005.
SCHULTE, J. Pictures of the soul. In: RACINE, Timothy. SLANEY, Kathleen. A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Use of Conceptual Analysis in Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
TER HARK, M. Beyond the Inner and the Outer: Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1990.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. I e II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. 3.ed. 2.reimp. São Paulo: EDUSP, 2001.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical investigations. 4ª ed. Blackwell Publishing, 2009a.
WITTGENSTEIN, L. Philosophy of Psychology – A Fragment. In: WITTGENSTEIN, L., Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical investigations 4ª ed. Blackwell Publishing, 2009b, pp. 182-244.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. Últimos Escritos Sobre a Filosofia da Psicologia. 2ª ed. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2014.
Published
Versions
- 2022-03-16 (2)
- 2021-12-28 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Voluntas: International Journal of Philosophy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The submission of original manuscripts to this journal implies the transference, by the authors, of the copyrights for printed and digital publication. The copyrights of a published manuscript belong ultimately to the author, and only the copyright for its first publication is reserved to the journal. Authors may only use the same results in other publications explicitly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication.
Licence
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) - This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.