Immanent metaphysics: Schopenhauer as point of inflection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179378633578Keywords:
Metaphysics, Immanence, Transcendence, PhysiologyAbstract
This article aims that demonstrate how Schopenhauer's philosophy, formulated at the confluence of two decisive tendencies for all contemporary reflection, the rise of the natural sciences and the crisis of idealistic philosophy, presents aspects that are decisive for important themes of philosophy. As a critic of the reductionism of the naturalist perspective, but also of the abstract character of rationalistic philosophy, his consideration of these perspectives results in a metaphysical philosophy with a necessary immanent basis that exerts great impact on the presuppositions of modern philosophical thought.
Downloads
References
BITTENCOURT, Renato Nunes. Schopenhauer, Nietzsche e a crítica ao formalismo da moral kantiana. Rio de Janeiro, Revista Voluntas: Estudos sobre Schopenhauer. Vol. 2, n.1, 2011, pp. 03-21.
BOZICKOIC, Vojislav. Schopenhauer on Scientific Knowledge. In: Bart Vandenabeele (Org.). A Compenion to Schopenhauer. Shushester (UK): Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2012, 11 – 24.
CACCIOLA, Maria Lúcia Mello e Oliveira. Schopenhauer e a questão do dogmatismo. São Paulo: EDUSP, 1994.
DAMÁSIO, António. Descartes Irrtum. Berlin: List Taschenbuch, 2007.
DAMÁSIO, António. E o cérebro criou o homem. Tradução de Laura Teixeira Motta. São Paulo: Companhia das letras, 2011.
GÖHMANN, Dirk. Neurophilosophie. In: KOΒLER, M. SHUBBE, D. (Org): Schopenhauer Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Frankfurt: J. B. Metzler, 2014.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988.
HAUCKE, Kai. Leben und Leiden. Zur Aktualität und Einheit der schopenhauerschen Philosophie. Berlin: Parerga, 2007.
HANNAN, Barbara. The Riddle of the World. A reconsideration of Schopenhauer´s Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
KOßLER, Matthias. „A vida é apenas um espelho“. O conceito crítico de vida de Schopenhauer. Florianópolis, Revista Ethic@, v. 11, n 2, junho de 2012, pp. 351-372.
LOVEJOY, Arthur. Schopenhauer as an Evolutionist. The Monist. Kant Studien 16 (1-3), 1911 – JSTOR, 2013, pp. 195-222.
PRADO, Jorge Luis Palicer do. Metafísica e ciência: vontade e analogia em Schopenhauer. Rio de Janeiro, Revista Voluntas, vol. 6, n.1, 2015, p. 44-84.
SALVIANO, Jarlee O. S. O fundamento epistemológico da metafísica da vontade de Arthur Schopenhauer. São Paulo, Revista TransFormAção, 32 (2), 2009, pp. 101-118.
SCHMIDT, Alfred. Physiologie und Tranzendentalphilosophie bei Schopenhauer. Schopenhauer Jahrbuch, 70. Frankfurt am Main: Kramer, 1989, pp. 43-53.
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. Werksausgabe. Zürich: Haffmans Verlag, 1987.
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. O mundo como vontade e como representação. Tomo I. Trad. Jair Lopes Barbosa. São Paulo:
Editora UNESP, 2005.
SCHOPENHAUER, Arthur. O mundo como vontade e representação. Tomo II. Trad. Eduardo Ribeiro da Fonseca. Curitiba: Editora UFPR, 2014.
SEGALA, Marco. Fisiologia e metafisica in Schopenhauer. Bologna, Rivista di Filosofia. Vol. LXXXV, n.1, 1994, pp. 35-60.
WEIMER, Wolfgang. Analytische Philosophie. In: KOΒLER, M. SHUBBE, D. (Org): Schopenhauer Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Frankfurt: J. B. Metzler, 2014, pp. 321-324.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The submission of original manuscripts to this journal implies the transference, by the authors, of the copyrights for printed and digital publication. The copyrights of a published manuscript belong ultimately to the author, and only the copyright for its first publication is reserved to the journal. Authors may only use the same results in other publications explicitly indicating this journal as the medium of the original publication.
Licence
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) - This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
