A INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL E A PROTEÇÃO DE DADOS

A “DEFINIÇÃO DE PERFIS” PARA A PREVENÇÃO DE CRIMES GRAVES E DO TERRORISMO NAS FONTES DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/1981369483679

Palavras-chave:

Crimes, Inteligência Artificial, Proteção de Dados, Segurança

Resumo

O texto procura evidenciar os riscos para os direitos fundamentais resultantes da utilização de sistemas de inteligência artificial para a prevenção de crimes graves e do terrorismo no quadro dos atuais atos legislativos da União Europeia em matéria de proteção de dados pessoais, sobretudo os relacionados com a «definição de perfis» por algoritmos de aprendizado profundo. Adicionalmente, intenta perspectivar as respostas legislativas que possam resultar da Proposta de Regulamento Inteligência Artificial da Comissão Europeia, tendo em atenção a Jurisprudência mais recente do Tribunal de Justiça da União Europeia e as posições institucionais assumidas sobre tais questões na Proposta.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Manuel David Masseno, Instituto Politécnico de Beja, Portugal

Professor Adjunto de Graduação e Mestrado e Pesquisador Sênior no Laboratório UbiNET - Segurança Informática e Cibercrime do Instituto Politécnico de Beja, Portugal.

Referências

ANALIDE, César; REBELO, Diogo Morgado. Inteligência artificial na era data-driven, a lógica fuzzy das aproximações soft computing e a proibição de sujeição a decisões tomadas exclusivamente com base na exploração e prospeção de dados pessoais. Fórum de Proteção de Dados, Comissão Nacional de Proteção de Dados, Lisboa, n. 6, p. 60-91, 2019. Disponible en: https://www.cnpd.pt/media/y1nosvyp/forum6_af_web_low.pdf.

BIRZU, Bogdan. Prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offenses and other serious crimes by using Passenger Name Record (PNR) data. Critical opinions. De lege ferenda proposals. Perspectives of Business Law Journal, v. 5, n. 1, p. 195-206, 2016. Disponible en: https://www.businesslawconference.ro/revista/articole/an5nr1/Art.%2027%20Bogdan%20Birzu.pdf.

BLASI CASAGRAN, Cristina. El reglamento europeo de Europol: Un nuevo marco jurídico para el intercambio de datos policiales en la UE. Revista General de Derecho Europeo, Madrid, n. 40, p. 202-221, 2016. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Cristina-Blasi-Casagran/publication/316286371_El_Reglamento_Europeo_de_Europol_Un_nuevo_marco_juridico_para_el_intercambio_de_datos_policiales_en_la_UE/links/58f9fdc94585152edece7b6b/El-Reglamento-Europeo-de-Europol-Un-nuevo-marco-juridico-para-el-intercambio-de-datos-policiales-en-la-UE.pdf.

BLASI CASAGRAN, Cristina. Fundamental rights implications of interconnecting migration and policing databases in the EU. Human Rights Law Review, Oxford, Oxford University Press, v. 21, n. 2, p. 433-457, 2021. Disponible en: https://academic.oup.com/hrlr/article-pdf/21/2/433/36582235/ngaa057.pdf.

BLASI CASAGRAN, Cristina et al. The role of emerging predictive IT tools in effective migration governance. Politics and Governance, Lisboa, v. 9, n. 4, p. 133-145, 2021. Disponible en: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4436.

BONFANTI, Angelica. Big data e polizia predittiva: riflessioni in tema di protezione del diritto alla privacy e dei dati personali. MediaLaws – Rivista di diritto dei media, Milano, n. 3, p. 206-218, 2018. Disponible en: https://www.medialaws.eu/rivista/big-data-e-polizia-predittiva-riflessioni-in-tema-di-protezione-del-diritto-alla-privacy-e-dei-dati-personali/.

BORGESIUS, Frederik Zuiderveen. Discrimination, Artificial Intelligence, and Algorithmic Decision Making. Strasbourg: Consejo de Europe, 2018. Disponible en: https://rm.coe.int/discrimination-artificial-intelligence-and-algorithmic-decision-making/1680925d73.

BRKAN, Maja. Do algorithms rule the world? Algorithmic decision-making and data protection in the framework of the GDPR and beyond. International journal of law and information technology, Oxford, v. 27, n. 2, p. 91-121, 2019. Disponible en: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3124901.

BRKAN, Maja; BONNET, Grégory. Legal and Technical Feasibility of the GDPR’s Quest for Explanation of Algorithmic Decisions: of Black Boxes, White Boxes and Fata Morganas European. Journal of Risk Regulation, Cambridge, v. 11, n. 1, p. 18-50, 2020. Disponible en: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-journal-of-risk-regulation/article/legal-and-technical-feasibility-of-the-gdprs-quest-for-explanation-of-algorithmic-decisions-of-black-boxes-white-boxes-and-fata-morganas/7324CDE80A300179C170C5BA8CA7E851.

BURRI, Thomas. The New Regulation of the European Union on Artificial Intelligence. In: VOENEKY, Silja et al. (Orgs.). The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. p. 104-122. Disponible en: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-responsible-artificial-intelligence/new-regulation-of-the-european-union-on-artificial-intelligence/C7FBB429998C4AC5ABBCAA594D2F8970.

CALDAS, Gabriela. O direito à explicação no Regulamento Geral sobre a Proteção de Dados. In: COUTINHO, Francisco Pereira; MONIZ, Graça Canto (Coords.). Anuário da Proteção de Dados - 2019. Lisboa: CEDIS; Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2019. p. 37-53. Disponible en: https://protecaodedadosue.cedis.fd.unl.pt/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/2.-Gabriela-Caldas.pdf.

CHIAPPETTA, Andrea; BATTAGLIA, Andrea. The impact of privacy andcybersecurity on e-record: The PNR Directive Adoption and the impact of GDPR. Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics, Ternopil, v. 3, n. 3, p. 77-87, 2018. Disponible en: https://jsdtl.sciview.net/index.php/jsdtl/article/view/58/43.

DE GREGORIO, Giovanni. Digital Constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing Rights and Powers in the Algorithmic Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. Disponible en: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/digital-constitutionalism-in-europe/A3F61C6368D17D953457234B8A59C502.

DUMBRAVA, Costica. Artificial intelligence at EU borders - Overview of applications and key issues. Brussels: Parlamento Europeo, 2021. Disponible en: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2021/690706/EPRS_IDA(2021)690706_EN.pdf.

GALÁN MUÑOZ, Alfonso. La protección de datos de carácter personal en los tratamientos destinados a la prevención, investigación y represión de delitos hacia una nueva orientación de la política criminal de la Unión Europea. Cyberlaw by CIJIC, Lisboa, n. 1, p. 22-57, 2016. Disponible en: https://www.iuris.edu.pt/xms/files/Cyberlaw-by-CIJIC_1.pdf.

GARSTKA, Krzysztof. Between Security and Data Protection: Searching for a Model of a Legal Big Data Surveillance Scheme within the European Union Data Protection Framework. University of Essex: HRBDT Occasional Paper Series, 2018. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329339463_Between_Security_and_Data_Protection_Searching_for_a_Model_of_a_Legal_Big_Data_Surveillance_Scheme_within_the_European_Union_Data_Protection_Framework_2018_HRBDT_Occasional_Paper_Series.

GONZÁLEZ FUSTER, Gloria. Artificial Intelligence and Law Enforcement - Impact on Fundamental Rights. Brussels: Parlamento Europeo, 2020. Disponible en: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/656295/IPOL_STU(2020)656295_EN.pdf.

GREE, Ben. The flaws of policies requiring human oversight of government algorithms. Computer Law & Security Review, Amsterdam, n. 45, 2022. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364922000292.

KORFF, Douwe; GEORGES, Marie. Passenger Name Records, data mining & data protection: the need for strong safeguards. Strasbourg: Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law; Council of Europe, 2015. Disponible en: https://rm.coe.int/16806a601b.

KUMBAR, Lea Katharina; ROTH-ISIGKEIT, David. A criterion-based approach to GDPR’s explanation requirements for automated individual decision-making. Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law, v. 12, n. 4, 2021. Disponible en: https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-12-4-2021/5403.

LA DIEGA, Guido Noto. Against the Dehumanisation of Decision-Making – Algorithmic Decisions at the Crossroads of Intellectual Property, Data Protection, and Freedom of Information. Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law, v. 9, n. 4, 2018. Disponible en: https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-9-1-2018/4677.

LISERS, Mark; CUSTERS, Bart. Conceptual Challenges of EU Directive 2016/680. European Data Protection Law Review, Berlin, v. 5, n. 3, p. 367-378, 2019. Disponible en: https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/handle/1887/79246.

LYNSKEY, Orla. Criminal justice profiling and EU data protection law: Precarious protection from predictive policing. International Journal of Law in Context, Cambridge, v. 15, n. 2, p. 162-176, 2019. Disponible en: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-law-in-context/article/criminal-justice-profiling-and-eu-data-protection-law-precarious-protection-from-predictive-policing/10FD4B64364191B619FBCB864CD40A7F.

MANEA, Teodor; DRAGOS, Ivan Lucian. AI Use in Criminal Matters as Permitted under EU Law and as Needed to Safeguard the Essence of Fundamental Rights. International Journal of Law in Changing World, Chelyabinsk, v. 1, n. 1, 2022. Disponible en: https://ijlcw.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/15.

MASSENO, Manuel David. El tratamiento de datos PNR en tiempos de datos masivos ('Big Data') - un análisis desde la perspectiva de las Sentencias 'Digital Rights Ireland' y 'Tele2 Sverige' del TJUE. In: Jornada sobre Derecho, Turismo y Nuevas Tecnologías. Palma de Mallorca: Universitat de les Illes Balears, 2017. Disponible en: https://www.academia.edu/31301045/El_tratamiento_de_datos_PNR_en_tiempos_de_datos_masivos_Big_Data_un_an%C3%A1lisis_desde_la_perspectiva_de_las_Sentencias_Digital_Rights_Ireland_y_Tele2_Sverige_del_TJUE.

MASSENO, Manuel David. Consideraciones breves sobre los Fundamentos de la Propuesta de Ley de Inteligencia Artificial de la Comisión Europea. Revista de Ciencia de la Legislación, Buenos Aires, n. 12, 2022. Disponible en: https://ar.ijeditores.com/pop.php?option=articulo&Hash=fc2693b96bdc49a24d23863bd43ef39c.

MATOS, Sara. Privacy and data protection in the surveillance society: The case of the Prüm system. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Amsterdam, n. 66, p. 155-161, 2019. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X1930068X.

MENDEZ, Mario. Opinion 1/15: The Court of Justice Meets PNR Data (Again!). European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, Roma, v. 2, n. 3, p. 803-818, 2017. Disponible en: https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/opinion-1-15-court-of-justice-meets-pnr-data-again.

MIRÓ-LLINARES, Fernando. Predictive policing: Utopia or dystopia? On attitudes towards the use of big data algorithms for law. Revista de Internet, derecho y política, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, n. 30, 2020. Disponible en: https://raco.cat/index.php/IDP/article/view/373608.

NEIVA, Laura; MACHADO, Helena. Big data na investigação criminal: “Imaginário Europeu” e orientações para o futuro. In: ARAÚJO, Emília Rodrigues; MACHADO, Helena y COSTA; Anyónio J. B. F. Jardim (Coord.). Ciência & política: fronteiras e interseções. II Jornadas Doutorais em Sociologia. Braga: Universidade do Minho, 2021. p. 28-41. Disponible en: https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/74887/1/Big%20Data%20e%20imagina%cc%81rio%20europeu.pdf.

ORRÙ, Elisa. The European PNR Directive as an instance of pre-emptive, risk-based algorithmic security and its implications for the regulatory framework. Information Polity, Amsterdam, v. 27, n. 2, p. 131-146, 2022. Disponible en: https://content.iospress.com/download/information-polity/ip211531?id=information-polity%2Fip211531.

PAAL, Boris. Artificial Intelligence as a Challenge for Data Protection Law. In: VOENEKY, Silja et al. (Orgs.). The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. p. 290-308. Disponible en: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-responsible-artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-as-a-challenge-for-data-protection-law/84B9874F94043E8AFC81616A60BA69CC.

POSCHER, Ralf. Artificial Intelligence and the Right to Data Protection. In: VOENEKY, Silja et al. (Orgs.). The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. p. 281-289. Disponible en: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-responsible-artificial-intelligence/artificial-intelligence-and-the-right-to-data-protection/26AB000E713FBF3BDB89067C23B118F1.

ROBINSON, Gavin. Data protection reform, passenger name record and telecommunications data retention. Critical Quarterly for Legislation and Law, Baden-Baden, v. 95, n. 4, p. 394-416, 2012. Disponible en: https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/44953/1/2193-7869-2012-4-394.pdf.

ROJSZCZAK, Marcin. The uncertain future of data retention laws in the EU: Is a legislative reset possible? Computer Law & Security Review, Amsterdam, n. 41, 2021. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364921000455.

SAJFERT, Juraj; QUINTEL, Teresa. Data Protection Directive (EU) 2016/680 for Police and Criminal Justice Authorities. SSRN, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2017. Disponible en: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3285873.

SELBST, Andrew D.; POWLES, Julia. Meaningful information and the right to explanation. International Data Privacy Law, Oxford, v. 7, n. 4, p. 233–242, 2017. Disponible en: https://academic.oup.com/idpl/article/7/4/233/4762325.

THONNES, Christian. A Directive altered beyond recognition - On the Court of Justice of the European Union’s PNR decision (C-817/19). Verfassungsblog – on matters constitutional. Berlin: Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH, 2022. Disponible en: https://verfassungsblog.de/pnr-recognition/.

VEALE, Michael; BORGESIUS, Frederik J. Zuiderveen. Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act. Analysing the good, the bad, and the unclear elements of the proposed approach. Computer Law Review International, Berlin, v. 22, n. 4, p. 97-112, 2021. Disponible en: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2107/2107.03721.pdf.

VILLANI, Susanna. Some further reflections on the Directive (EU) 2016/681 on PNR data in the light of the CJEU Opinion 1/15 of 26 July 2017. Revista de derecho político, Madrid, n. 101, p. 899-928, 2018. Disponible en: https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/derechopolitico/article/view/21982/17970.

VOGIATZOGLOU, Plixavra et al. From Theory to Practice: Exercising The Right Of Access Under The Law Enforcement And PNR Directives. Journal of intellectual property, information technology and electronic commerce law, v. 11, n. 3, 2021. Disponible en: https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-11-3-2020/5191.

ZANDTRA, Timo; BROWER, Evelien. Fundamental Rights at the Digital Border - ETIAS, the Right to Data Protection, and the CJEU’s PNR judgment. Verfassungsblog – on matters constitutional. Berlin: Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog gGmbH, 2022. Disponible en: https://verfassungsblog.de/digital-border/.

ZAVRSNIK, Aleš. Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems, and human rights. ERA Forum, Academy of European Law, n. 20, p. 567–583, 2020. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12027-020-00602-0.

Publicado

30-12-2022

Como Citar

David Masseno, M. (2022). A INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL E A PROTEÇÃO DE DADOS: A “DEFINIÇÃO DE PERFIS” PARA A PREVENÇÃO DE CRIMES GRAVES E DO TERRORISMO NAS FONTES DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA. Revista Eletrônica Do Curso De Direito Da UFSM, 17(2), e83679. https://doi.org/10.5902/1981369483679

Edição

Seção

Artigos científicos