Students’ survey for assessing HE teachers’ work – advantages and disadvantages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1984644430084Palabras clave:
Evaluation, Students, TeachersResumen
The self-evaluation as a basic tool is used by every higher education institution, which wants to improve the quality of its own working. Relevant segment of the self-evaluation process is the work of the teacher, which is evaluated through a survey that is filled in by the students. Thus, the aim of the paper is to show the advantages and disadvantages of the students' survey as a part of the self-evaluation process at the "Sv. Kliment Ohridski" University in Bitola, in the Republic of Macedonia. The research has a qualitative paradigm, ie the twelve statements of this survey are related to their impact on the validity and objectivity of the results for the teachers' work, as well as their relevance in the multidimensional construct teaching.The research has also quantitative paradigm, ie the attitudes and the opinions of 100 teachers that work at this University referring to the statements 'powerfulness in teaching are analyzed and of 200 students that study at this University on the effects of the students' survey. The research has descriptive design. Methods used for processing the data and for gaining conclusions are analysis, synthesis and comparison. The research indicates that besides the advantages, this students 'survey has numerous disadvantages that should be taken in account, because they influence the validity and the objectivity of the grade for the teachers' work. Therefore, there is an urgent review of this survey.
Citas
Beran, T. & Violato, C. (2009). Student Ratings of Teaching Effectiveness: Student Engagement and Course Characteristics. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, v. 39, no. 1, 1-13. http://bit.ly/2riM5Xo, 16.3.2017
Beran, T. N. & Rokosh, L. J. (2009). The Consequential Validity of Student Ratings: What do Instructors Really Think? The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, vol. 55, no. 4, 497-511. http://bit.ly/2safPtH, 16.3.2016
Hoyt, P. D. & Pallett, H. W. (1999). Appraising Teaching Effectiveness: Beyond Student Ratings. Idea paper, no. 36. Idea Center. http://bit.ly/2sPrzQn, 16.3.2017
Kelly, M. (2012). Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness: Considerations for Ontario Universities. http://bit.ly/2sPMqTz, 15.3.2017
Marsh, W. H. & Roche, A. L. (1997). Making Students' Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness Effective. The Critical Issues of Validity, Bias, and Utility. American Psychologist, vol. 52, no. 11, 1187-1197. http://bit.ly/2sakJ9X, 16.3.2017
Otany, K., Joon Kim, B. & Cho, Jeong-IL. (2012). Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) in Higher Education: How to Use SET More Effectively and Efficiently in Public Affairs Education. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 18 (3), 531-544 http://bit.ly/2t8hWvs, 15.3.2017
Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Rytkönen ,H. (2011). Students’ conceptions of good teaching in three different disciplines. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 36, i. 5. http://bit.ly/2rO7gUO, 16.3.2017
Seldin, P. (1993). How Colleges Evaluate Professors, 1983 v. 1993. POD Network Conference Materials. Paper 110. http://bit.ly/2saliR4, 16.3.2016
Author & Author. (2015). Aspekti na ocenuvanjeto [Aspects of assessment]. Bitola: “Sv. Kliment Ohridski” University, Faculty of Education
Tolkoven rechnik na makedonskiot jazik. (2011). [Monolingual dictionary of the Macedonian language]. Skopje: Institut za makedonski jazik “K. Misirkov”
Zakon za visoko obrazovanie. Konsolidiran tekst. „Sluzhben vesnik na Republika Makedonija “ br. [The Law for higher education. Consolidated text. Official journal of the Republic of Macedonia, no.] 35/2008, 103/2008, 26/2009, 83/2009,99/2009, 115/2010, 17/2011, 51/2011, 123/2012, 15/2013, 24/2013, 41/2014, 116/2014,130/2014, 10/2015, 20/2015, 98/2015, 145/2015, 154/2015, 30/2016 и 127/16
http://www.mon.gov.mk/images/Закон_за_високото_образование.pdf, 15.3.2017
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Declaramos o artigo _______________________________ a ser submetido para avaliação o periódico Educação (UFSM) é original e inédito, assim como não foi enviado para qualquer outra publicação, como um todo ou uma fração.
Também reconhecemos que a submissão dos originais à Revista Educação (UFSM) implica na transferência de direitos autorais para publicação digital na revista. Em caso de incumprimento, o infrator receberá sanções e penalidades previstas pela Lei Brasileira de Proteção de Direitos Autorais (n. 9610, de 19/02/98).
_______________________________________________________
Nome completo do primeiro autor
CPF ________________