Post-pandemic, social interaction and psychosocial effects in the population of a globalized world
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/1984644485168Keywords:
Covid-19 pandemic, Social interaction, psychosocial processesAbstract
This text states that the Covid-19 pandemic mainly affected social interactions between people and that this had serious consequences that are being expressed in the post-pandemic. A series of considerations on the pandemic that has taken place in this globalized world are presented, and the analysis that is carried out considers some of the most important areas of social life, such as political, economic, educational, and family and personal life. Likewise, three axes are included in the analysis: the institutional, the one related to the social processes and the one of the results of both the structure and the social processes. In all of this, psychosocial processes stand out, that is, people's cognitions and emotions, and their behavior, which have been directly affected by the pandemic. In conclusion, it is pointed out that, in order to face the impacts of the pandemic, it is necessary to promote more positive social interactions, which are permeated by empathetic and cooperative behaviors and, in this way, protect people's physical and mental health.
References
Bahía, L. et al. (2021). A tragédia brasileira do coronavírus/covid-19: Uma análise do desgoverno do governo federal, 2020-2021. Documento entregue à Comissão Parlamentar de Inquérito (CPI) da Covid-19 do Senado Federal (28 de abril, 2021). https://www.clacso.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/tragedia-brasileira-covid_u%CC%81ltima.pdf
Bentall, R. (2011). Medicalizar la mente. ¿Sirven de algo los tratamientos psiquiátricos? España: Herder.
Castro, N. E. et al. (2021). Interacciones sociales, espacio-tiempo y subjetividad de los estudiantes universitarios durante el confinamiento. Tramas, 56, 169-216.
Conrad, P. (2007). The medicalization of society. On the transformation of human conditions into treatrable disorders. Baltimore: The Jonhs Hopkins University Press.
de la Peña, R. (2021). Las repercusiones políticas de una pandemia. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 66(242), 143-165. https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2021.242.79324
Domíngues, J. M. (2017). Las formas básicas de la interacción social. Míriada, 9(13), 45-69.
Eslava, J. C. (2017). Pensando la determinación social del proceso salud-enfermedad. Revista de Salud Pública, 9(3), 396-403.
Fernández, G. (2022). Comorbilidades y Covid-19: Información oficial sobre mortalidad en México. Documento de Trabajo nº. 378. México: Cámara de Diputados LXV Legislatura/CESOP.
Gualdrón, J. P. (2021). La pandemia de COVID-19 y su impacto en los niños: perspectiva desde un punto de vista holístico. MedUNAB, 24(3),335-339. https://doi.org/10.29375/01237047.4307
Guil, J. (2023). Intento de suicidio antes y durante la pandemia de covid-19. Estudio comparativo desde el servicio de urgencias. Semergen, 49(3), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semerg.2023.101922
Haan, E., & ten Kate, A. (2023). Pharma´s pandemic profits. Pharma profits from COVID-19 vaccines. Amsterdam: Stichting Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen.
Hyunji, K., & Florak, A. (2021). When social interaction backfires: Frecuent social interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with decreased well-being and higher panic buying. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668272
Laurell, A. C. (1982). La salud-enfermedad como proceso social. Cuadernos Médico Sociales, 19, 1-11.
Laurell, A. C. (2020). Las dimensiones de la pandemia de Covid-19. El Trimestre Económico, 87(348), 963-984. https://www.eltrimestreeconomico.com.mx/index.php/te/article/view/1153
Long, E. et al. (2021). Covid-19 pandemic and its impact on social relationships and health. Journal of Epidemilogy & Community Health, 76(2), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-216690.
López-Leyva, M. A. (2023). Un panorama de la democracia en tiempos pandémicos. In M. A. López-Leyva & L. Montes de Oca (Coords.), Democracia en Tiempos difíciles (pp. 41-73). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Mittelman, J. (2002). El síndrome de la globalización. Transformación y resistencia. México: Siglo XXI.
Montaudon, C. M. et al. (2021). Estado del trabajo remoto en México durante la pandemia de COVID-19. México: Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla.
Munné, F. (1995). La interacción social. Teorías y ámbitos. Barcelona: Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias.
Ni, Y., & Jia, F. (2023). Promoting positive social interactions: Recommendation for a post-pandemic school-based intervention for social anxiety. Children, 10(3), 491. https:// doi.org/10.3390/children10030491
Pérez-Padilla, R. (2023). Escenas de la pandemia: pan-egoísmo, pan-ambición y pandemia. In S. Ponce de León & M. Rodríguez (Coords.), La crisis sanitaria (pp- 29-45). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Rocha, R. (2009). Reflexiones acerca de las determinaciones sociales del proceso salud-enfermedad. Vertientes - Revista especializada en Ciencias de la Salud, 12(1-2), 31-36.
Rocha, R. (2022). Estilo de pensamiento estratégico. In R. Raul et al. (Ed.), Estilos de pensamiento en políticos profesionales. Hacia una mejor representación política sustantiva en México (pp. 97-124). México: UNAM/FES Zaragoza.
Stoke, et al. (2021). Social inequality and solidarity in times of COVID 19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6339), 1-12.
Turner, J. H. (1988). A theory of social interaction. United States of America: Stanford University Press.
Wachtler, B. et al. (2020). Socioeconomic inequalities and COVID-19 - A review of the current international literature. Journal of Health Monitoring, 5(7), 3-17. https//doi.org/10.25646/7059
World Bank (2022). World development report 2022. Finance for an equitable recovery. United States of America: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/e1e22749-80c3-50ea-b7e1-8bc332d0c2ff/content
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Education
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Declaration of originality
We declare that all articles present in the journal Educação (UFSM) are originals and were not submitted for publishing on any other publication, as a whole or a fraction. We also declare that, after being published by Educação (UFSM), a paper will not be submitted to another journal within two years. After this time, our journal transfers the publishing rights to the authors, with a permit granted by the Editorial Council.
We also acknowledge that the originals’ submission to Educação (UFSM) implies on a transference of copyright for physical and digital publishing to the journal. In case of noncompliance, the violator will receive sanctions and penalties predicted by the Brazilian Copyright Protection Law (n. 9610, dated 19/02/98).
Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
This license lets others remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, and copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)