A importância da Lei 9.795/99 e das diretrizes curriculares nacionais da educação ambiental para docentes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/223613086926Keywords:
Legislação Lei 9.795/99 Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais de Educação AmbientalAbstract
The article focuses on the importance of dissemination of documents that legitimizeEnvironmental Education, especially Law No. 9.795/99 establishing the Environmental Educationin Brazil - which is the basis of Resolution No. 2 of 15 June 2012 laying down guidelines NationalCurriculum for Environmental Education - so that teachers can improve its practices becominginterdisciplinary environmental education in all grades and in all subjects and at all levels ofeducation, from kindergarten to college. It indicates that there is a gap regarding the teachers'knowledge of this important law and the guidelines recently approved EA, and without theknowledge of these documents and other important reference documents, EnvironmentalEducation will continue to be handled in a tight, fragmented, limited the dates of celebrations asWorld Water Day, Earth Day, Indian Day, Environment Day, and limited to issues such as wasteseparation, environmental disasters and catastrophic issues, - what more frightening than educate- to the awakening of environmental consciousness. Suggests the promotion of a mini-course forteachers of different educational levels to experience these important documents that legitimizeEnvironmental Education in Brazil.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. RESOLUÇÃO Nº 2, DE 15 DE JUNHO DE 2012, que estabelece as Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais para a Educação Ambiental. DOU nº 116, Seção 1, págs. 70-71 de 18/06/2012.
_______. Lei n. 9795 - 27 de abril de 1999. Dispõe sobre a educação ambiental. Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental. Brasília, 1999.
_______. Ministério da Educação. Secretaria de Educação Média e Tecnológica. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais. Brasília, 1999.
FURTADO, D. J. Os caminhos da educação ambiental nos espaços formais de ensinoaprendizagem: qual o papel da política nacional de Educação Ambiental? Rev. eletrônica Mestr. Educ. Ambient. ISSN 1517-1256, v. 22, janeiro a julho de 2009. Disponivel em: http://www.remea.furg.br/edicoes/vol22/art24v22.pdf. Acesso em: 20/10/09.
MEDINA, N. M. A formação dos professores em Educação Ambiental. In: Panorama da educação ambiental no ensino fundamental / Secretaria de Educação Fundamental – Brasília: MEC ; SEF, 2001.
OLIVEIRA, M. E. de, A Temática Ambiental no Ensino Médio. Disponível em: http://www.educacao.ufpr.br/publicacoes/sedpeef/resumos_comunicacao_%20oral_%20em_%20pdf/mariaeunice.pdf. Acesso em: 20/10/2009
SANTOS, A. S. R dos, Educação ambiental e o poder público. 2000. Disponível em: http://www.aultimaarcadenoe.com.br/educacao-ambiental/. Acesso em 16/10/09
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
