A relação entre desmotivação e o processo ensino-aprendizagem

Authors

  • Teresinha de Fátima Souto Almeida Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS
  • Jerônimo Sartori Universidade Federal do Pampa, São Gabriel, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613086194

Keywords:

Lack of motivation, Evening course, Pedagogical practice, Teaching and learning

Abstract

This paper analyzes the influence of the lack of motivation in the teaching - learning process,addressing the issue of interdisciplinarity as a factor of integration in the process of knowledgeconstruction. A survey of the leading indicators on teachers and students’ discouragement wasconducted. For the analysis it was adopted the assumptions of the teaching and learning process,understanding education in its interdisciplinary aspects and its relation to lack of motivation. Toestablish a comparison with the theoretical analysis, a diagnosis was made on the school context,which was systematized after a critical and reflexive analysis, identifying some alternativesolutions to the problem of lack of motivation in elementary schools. According to the diagnosis itwas evident that the lack of motivation leads to failing and dropping out. However, it wasconcluded that it is possible to overturn the situation through a work in an interdisciplinaryperspective using the communication technologies as well as investing in teacher training aimingto think over changing in the pedagogical practice, taking a closer look at the needs of the eveningcourse students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BRASIL. Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional (Lei n. 9394/96), Brasília, 1996.

BZUNECK, J. A. A Motivação do aluno: aspectos introdutórios. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2004.

CAPORALINI, M. Bernadete Santa Cecília. A transmissão do conhecimento e o ensino noturno. Campinas-SP: Papirus,1991.

CARVALHO, C. P. Alternativas para o trabalho pedagógico voltado ao ensino noturno. São Paulo: FDE. 1998. p. 75-89 (Série idéia).

FAZENDA, Ivani C. Arantes. Interdisciplinaridade: História, teoria e pesquisa. Campinas, São Paulo: Papirus, 1994. (Coleção Magistério: Formação e trabalho pedagógico).

JAPIASSU, Hilton. Interdisciplinaridade e Patologia do saber. Rio de Janeiro: Imago, 1976.

MELO, Alessandro de. Fundamentos socioculturais da educação. Curitiba: Ibpex, 2011.

PIAGET, J. A epistemologia genética. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1973.

PUCCI, B. OLIVEIRA, N. R; SGUSSARDI. V. O ensino noturno e os trabalhadores. São Paulo: Edufscar, 1994.

RUIZ, João Álvaro. Metodologia científica: guia para eficiência nos estudos. 3. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1991.

SARTORI, Jerônimo; SEGAT, Taciana Camera. Primeiros exercícios docentes: limites e desafios do estágio. SARTORI, Jerônimo; WESCHENFELDER, Lorita Maria (org.). Práticas Pedagógicas: Vivências e reflexões. Passo Fundo: Ed. Universidade de Passo Fundo, 2007. p. 78-100.

VERNON, M. D. Motivação Humana. Trad. L. C. Lucchetti. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1973.

VYGOTSKY, L. S. Pensamento e linguagem. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1998.

Downloads

Published

2012-08-07

How to Cite

Almeida, T. de F. S., & Sartori, J. (2012). A relação entre desmotivação e o processo ensino-aprendizagem. Monografias Ambientais, 8(8), 1870–1886. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613086194

Issue

REMOA, V. 8, 2012, EDIÇÃO ESPECIAL: ESPECIALIZAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO: INTERDISCIPLINARIDADE E TRANSVERSALIDADE - UNIPAMPA - CAMPUS SÃO GABIREL - RS

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.