Interdisciplinary practice on food using the Rotation by Stations methodology in kindergarten
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130843399Keywords:
Interdisciplinary, Station Rotation, Technology, Healthy eating habits, Teaching methodologyAbstract
Nowadays, the digital age affects all the young people, the way they act and see the world, socialize and learn. Schools are stuck in the traditional teaching method, without access to technology or any other instrument or methodology, they need a paradigm shift, including in their teaching groundbreaking interdisciplinary teaching techniques that improves kid’s learning in a very significant way. The main objective of the present article is to evaluate an interdisciplinary teaching practice using Station Rotation technique to develop healthy eating habits, including Portuguese, English and Science. An activity plan was developed and applied to kindergarten students of a private School in the city of São Gabriel, RS. It’s about a research-action with participant observation and data analysis of documents written by the teacher and the school coordinator. The analysis shows the benefits of an interdisciplinary activity, such as the participation and curiosity of the students. Working pedagogical contents in an interdisciplinary way provides the kids resources which develop teaching-learning in an independent approach, besides improving the interaction as well as improving group interaction and classroom dynamics. The use of the Station Rotation technique confirmed that a learning process takes place when the student learns in a more personalized and autonomous way by valuing their skills and competences and having the teacher as a facilitator of the learning process.
Downloads
References
ANDRADE, M.C., SOUZA, P. (2016). Modelos de Rotação do Ensino Híbrido: Estações de trabalho e sala de aula invertida. E-tech: Tecnologias para Competitividade Industrial, Florianópolis, v.9, n. 1, 2016.
FAZENDA, I.C. (2011). Integração e Interdisciplinaridade no Ensino Brasileiro: Efetividade ou Ideologia. 6º edição. São Paulo: Editora Loyola, 2011.
GATTÁS, M.L., FUREGATO, A.R. A interdisciplinaridade na educação. Revista da Rede de Enfermagem do Nordeste. Fortaleza, v.8, num. 1, p 85-91, jan-fev, 2007.
OLIVEIRA, M.I., PESCE, L. (2017). Emprego do modelo rotação por estações para o ensino de língua portuguesa. Teccogs: Revista Digital de Tecnologias Cognitivas, TIDD/ PUC-SP, São Paulo, n.16, p. 103-118, jul-dez.2018.
RAMOS, M, STEIN, L. (2000). Desenvolvimento do Comportamento Alimentar Infantil. Jornal da Pediatria. Rio de Janeiro, v. 76, p.229-237.
SANTOS, B., SILVA, C., PINTO, E. (2018). Importância da Escola na Educação Alimentar em Crianças do Primeiro Ciclo do Ensino Básico – Como ser mais eficaz. Acta Portuguesa de Nutrição. Porto, v.14, p. 18-23, set 2008.
THIESEN, J. A Interdisciplinaridade como um movimento articulador no processo ensino-aprendizagem. Revista Brasileira de Educação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 13, n. 39, set-dez, 2008.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
