Interdisciplinarity and environmental education: a bibliometric analysis of journals published between 2017 and 2019.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130843395Keywords:
Interdisciplinarity, Environmental education, BibliometryAbstract
The objective of this work was to carry out a bibliometric analysis in the CAPES journals on the themes: interdisciplinarity and environmental education. We have analyzed 85 articles from the years 2017 to 2019. This investigation sought data regarding gender, methodology, authors' gender, keywords, area of knowledge, regions and countries, most discussed themes, existence of results and institutions most cited. From the data analysis, it was possible to correlate the terms interdisciplinarity and environmental education with several subjects from different areas of knowledge, within a context of analysis of the complexity that the themes require. It was reinforced the idea that these themes are requiring new theories and methodologies, which integrate the scientific rigor of the researcher with the analytical creativity of the educator. Challenge posed to researchers/educators of the aforementioned themes.
Downloads
References
BOFF, L. Sustentabilidade: o que é: o que não é. 5ª ed. Petrópolis-RJ: Vozes, 2016.
BRANDALISE, L.T.; BERTOLINI, G.R.F.; HOSS, O.; ROJO, C.A. A. Educação e gestão ambiental: sustentabilidade em ambientes competitivos. 2ª ed. Cascavel, Paraná: DRHS, 2017.
COIMBRA, José de Ávila Aguiar. Considerações sobre a interdisciplinaridade. In: PHILIPPI JR, Arlindo et al. (Org.) Interdisciplinaridade em Ciências Ambientais.São Paulo: Ed. Signus, 2000.
FÁBREGA, Eunice Pessin. Interdisciplinaridade. São Paulo, 2004.
FAZENDA, Ivani Catarina Arantes. Didática e interdisciplinaridade. 8. ed. São Paulo: Papirus, 2003. (Coleção Práxis).
FAZENDA, I. C. A. (Org.); Lenoir (Org.); PIMENTA, S. (Org.); KENSKI, V. (Org.). Didática e Interdisciplinaridade. 9ª. ed. Campinas: Papirus, 2005.
FAZENDA, Ivani. A Interdisciplinaridade: um projeto em parceria. São Paulo: Loyola, 1993.
FERRARI, S. L. P.; Cribari-Neto, F. Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics, v. 31, n. 7, p. 799-815, 2004.
FERREIRA, M. P. A bibliometric study on ghoshal ́s managing across borders.The Multinational Business Review, Reino Unido, v. 19, n. 4, p. 357-375, nov., 2011.
FLORIANI, D. Diálogos interdisciplinares para uma agenda socioambiental:breve inventário do debate sobre ciência,sociedade e natureza. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, n. 1, p. 21-39, jan./jun. 2000. Editora da UFPR, 2000.
MEDINA, N.M.; SANTOS, E.C. Educação Ambiental: uma metodologia participativa de formação. Petrópolis – SP: Vozes, 1999.
ROCHA, Paulo Ernesto Diaz. Trajetória e perspectivas da Interdisciplinaridade ambiental na pós-graduação brasileira. Ambiente & Sociedade. [online]. v. VI n. 2 jul./dez, 2003.
SANTOS, M. 1992: A redescoberta da Natureza. São Paulo: Estudos Avançados, São Paulo, v.6, n.14, jan./abr. 1992.
SANTOS, M. O Brasil: território e sociedade no início do século XXI. 13 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2000.
TRISTÃO, Martha. A educação ambiental e a emergência de uma cultura sustentável no cenário da globalização. Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar. Interthesis, 2012, 9.1: 207-222.
NASCIMENTO, Priscila Thais Bezerra; MENDES, Tamires Gabryele Lima; BEZERRA, Jaelson Melo. Educação Ambiental e projetos interdisciplinares: um olhar sob os anos finais do ensino fundamental. Revista Brasileira de Meio Ambiente, 2018, 2.1.
GUIMARÃES, M. Educação Ambiental: No consenso um embate?.5 ed. Campinas: Papirus, 2000.
______; Lei Federal. Nº 9.795, de 27 de abril de 1999. Dispõe sobre a educação ambiental, institui a Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental e dá outras providências.
AYRES, F. G. S.; FILHO, J. B.B. O exercício das liberdades, o combate à pleonexia e a educação ambiental no processo do desenvolvimento. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais,[S.l],n.7, p.27-33, ago.2007.
SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Um discurso sobre as ciências na transição para uma ciência pós-moderna. EstudosAvançados.[online].[S.l.]:v. l2, n.2, p. 46-71, 1988.
LEÃO, A.L.C.; SILVA, L.M.A. Fazendo Educação Ambiental. 4ª ed. Recife: CPRH - Companhia Pernambucana do Meio Ambiente, 1999.
LEFF, E. Saber ambiental: Sustentabilidade, Racionalidade, Complexidade, Poder. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2001.
CARVALHO, I.C.M. Em direção ao mundo da vida: interdisciplinaridade e Educação Ambiental / Conceitos para se fazer Educação Ambiental. Brasília: IPÊ - Instituto de Pesquisas Ecológicas, 1998.
PEREIRA, Antonio. A educação não formal e educação social na ordem do dia: entre conflitos e possibilidades educativas. In: Revista Metáfora Educacional (ISSN 1809-2705) – versão on-line, n. 15 (jul. – dez. 2013), Feira de Santana – Bahia (Brasil), dez./2013. p. 129-148.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
