Perspectives of environmental managers of CIGRES-consultant municipalities in the selective collection process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130840176Keywords:
Selective collect, Urban solid waste, Environmental management, Environmental EducationAbstract
There are still insufficient Brazilian municipalities which carry out actions for the urban solid waste management. Several factors have contributed to environmental education work in many cases being absent or ineffective. This study aimed to identify the methods of environmental education, the weaknesses and potentialities in the system implementation process, aiming at analysis, discussion and proposition of tools, solutions and/or mitigation of the difficulties which were found. For this, a qualitative and quantitative research was conducted directed to the environmental managers of the municipalities of the northwestern Rio Grande do Sul-RS. Given the results it was found that many municipalities are still late in this process and the vast majority have faced numerous challenges, including the lack of support within the municipal administration and the general population. It was also evidenced the necessity of the implantation of this system to be intense and uninterrupted, integrating information activities, sensitization and mobilization of all involved. After data analysis, a lecture was realized with the environmental managers, where the research results were presented and discussed. In addition, tips were shared to facilitate the process of implementing selective collection, many of which were presented by the environmental managers themselves in their responses.
Downloads
References
BRASIL, Lei N° 12.305 de 02 de agosto de 2010 - Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos (PNRS), Brasília, 2010.
BRASIL. Constituição (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal: Centro Gráfico, 1988.
BRASIL, Lei 9795. Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental, Brasília: Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, 1999.
GUIMARÃES A. Falta Educação ambiental para quem mais precisa. 2008. Disponível em: https://novaescola.org.br/conteudo/2894/falta-educacao-ambiental-para-quem-mais-precisa Acesso em: 01/10/18.
HEBER, F.; SILVA, E. M. D. Institucionalização da Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos: dilemas e constrangimentos na Região Metropolitana de Aracaju (SE). Rio de Janeiro: Rev. Adm. Pública, v. 48, n. 4, p. 913-937. 2014.
IPEA- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA ECONÔMICA APLICADA, Sensibilização E Mobilização Dentro Da Política Nacional De Resíduos Sólidos: Desafios e Oportunidades da Educação Ambiental, Texto para discussão/ Brasília: IPEA, Rio de Janeiro, 2012.
IPEA- INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA ECONÔMICA APLICADA. Situação Social das Catadoras e dos Catadores de Material Reciclável e Reutilizável, Brasília: IPEA, Rio de Janeiro, 2013.
MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Plano Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos. 2012. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/estruturas/253/_publicacao/253_publicacao02022012041757.pdf Acesso em: 20 de set de 2018.
MAIELLO, A.; BRITTO, A. L. N. DE P. & VALLE, T. F. Implementação da Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos. Rio de Janeiro: Rev. Adm. Pública, vol.52 nº 1. 2018
NOGUEIRA, C. F. DE A. Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos, Coleta Seletiva e seus Atores – o caso do Distrito Federal. Distrito Federal: Revista Brasileira de Direito, vol. 10 nº 1. 2014.
OLIVEIRA, T. B. &, JUNIOR, A. C. G. Planejamento municipal na gestão dos resíduos sólidos urbanos e na organização da coleta seletiva Rio de Janeiro: Scielo. Eng. Sanit. Ambient., vol.21 no.1, 2016.
OLIVEIRA, D. A. M. Percepção de riscos ocupacionais em catadores de materiais recicláveis: estudo em uma cooperativa em Salvador-Bahia. Dissertação (Mestrado em Saúde, Ambiente e Trabalho) – Universidade Federal da Bahia, 174 f Salvador, 2011.
SCHALCH, V. W. LEITE, C. A.; JÚNIOR , J. L. F.; DE CASTRO, M.C. A. A. Gestão E Gerenciamento De Resíduos Sólidos- Universidade de São Paulo Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Departamento de Hidráulica e Saneamento. São Carlos, 2002.
STUMPF, U.; D. THEIS, V. & SCHREIBER, D. Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos em Empresas Metalomecânicas De Pequeno Porte. São Paulo: Rev. Gest. Ambient. Sustentabilidade, Vol. 7, N. 2, 2018.
VIANA, D. S. M.; BARROS, E. S. M.; SOARES, Z. T. Lixo: o que fazer? Rev. Educação Ambiental em Ação, n.57, ano 16, 2016.
VIRGENS, R. A. Educação Ambiental no Ambiente Escolar, 2011. 26 F. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Licenciatura em Biologia)- Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2011.
WESLEY R. S. F. E CHARBEL J. C. J. Utilizando Estudo de Caso(S) Como Estratégia De Pesquisa Qualitativa: Boas Práticas E Sugestões. Lajeado: Rev. Estudo & Debate, v. 18, n. 2, 2011.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
