A educação ambiental chega à escola. E agora?

Authors

  • Tânia Mara de Bastiani Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083312

Keywords:

Educação Ambiental, Horta escolar, Interdisciplinaridade

Abstract

O artigo proposto examina como podemos pensar a Educação Ambiental no ensino formal e não formal a partir do uso da horta escolar como recurso didático para a prática da interdisciplinaridade. Para tanto, buscou-se analisar alguns artigos da lei 9.795 de 1999 e qual a possibilidade de seu cumprimento através da horta escolar no Colégio Estadual Padre Rômulo Zanchi da cidade de Santa Maria, RS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANDRADE, Daniel Fonseca de. Implementação da Educação Ambiental em Escolas: uma reflexão. Revista eletrônica do mestrado em educação ambiental. Rio Grande do Sul. v. 04. out/nov/dez. 2000.

BARCELOS, Valdo H. de L.; NOAL, Fernando O. “A temática ambiental e a Educação: Uma aproximação necessária”. In. NOAL, Fernando O.; REIGOTA, Marcos; BARCELOS, Valdo H. de L. (orgs.). Tendências da Educação Ambiental Brasileira. Santa Cruz do Sul: EDUNISC, 2000.

BRASIL. Lei 9795, de 27 de abril de 1999. Dispõe sobre a educação ambiental, institui a Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 28 abr. 1999.

CRIBB, Sandra L. de S. P. Contribuições da educação ambiental e horta escolar na promoção de melhorias ao ensino, à saúde e ao ambiente. REMPEC - Ensino, Saúde e Ambiente, v.3 n. 1 p. 42-60 Abril 2010.

GONÇALVES, Glaciane Neves; CRUZ-SILVA, Claudia T. A. da. Análise dos conhecimentos sobre problemas ambientais dos alunos do ensino fundamental e ensino médio da rede pública. Revista eletrônica do mestrado em educação ambiental. Rio Grande do Sul. v. 23. jul/dez. 2009.

LEFF, Enrique. Saber Ambiental: Sustentabilidade, racionalidade, complexidade, poder. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 2001.

Downloads

Published

2011-07-11

How to Cite

Bastiani, T. M. de. (2011). A educação ambiental chega à escola. E agora?. Monografias Ambientais, 3(3), 430–433. https://doi.org/10.5902/223613083312

Issue

REMOA, V. 3, N. 3, JUL., 2011

Section

ARTICLES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.