Environmental awareness education: textual genres approach through reading and writing workshops
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820638Keywords:
Environmental awareness education, Interdisciplinary, Textual genresAbstract
Environmental Awareness Education means practical actions to build relationships based on responsibility and reasonable use of nature resources and environment as well as the perpretation and maintenance of all the planet living things. Considering that the following article presents research data about projects developed at Escola de Ensino Fundamental Dr Pery da Cunha Gonçalves located in São Gabriel /RS , 8º grade, subject of Portuguese Language. The main objective was study subjects and situations related to environmental awareness offering reflexive and critical actions to understand man and nature relation. Reading and Writing Workshops to produce texts using Journalistic Genre as well as the study of the transversal theme were used as methodology. One of the obtained results was waking up students to critical observations allowing them to evaluate how their life styles impact the environment.
Downloads
References
ACSELRAD, Henri; VIEIRA, Liszt & GUARANY, Reinaldo. Ecologia Direito do Cidadão. Rio de Janeiro: Gráfica JB, 1993.
BRASIL. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: Meio Ambiente e Saúde/ Temas Transversais. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília: MEC/SEF,V.9,1997.
BRASIL. Parâmetros Curriculares Nacionais: Língua Portuguesa / Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília: MEC/SEF, V.2,1997.
FAZENDA, Ivani. Interdisciplinaridade: História, Teoria e Pesquisa. 18. ed., São Paulo: Papirus Editora, 2014.
FAZENDA, Ivani. Didática e Interdisciplinaridade. 17 ed. São Paulo: Papirus Editora, 2013.
FILHO, Francisco Alves. Gêneros Jornalísticos/ notícias e cartas de leitor no ensino fundamental. São Paulo: Cortez Editora, 2011.
HUTCHISON, David. Educação Ecológica: ideias sobre consciência ambiental. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas Sul, 2000.
MÜLLER, Jackson. Educação Ambiental: Diretrizes para a prática pedagógica. Porto Alegre/RS: Edição FAMURS.
SCHNEUWLY, Bernard; DOLZ, Joaquim. Gêneros orais e escritos na escola. São Paulo: Mercado de Letras Edições e Livraria LTDA, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.