Municipal solid waste as a theme for science education in the Youth and Adult Education (EJA)

Authors

  • Vanuberci Franco Monteiro da Silva Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso, Jaciara, MT
  • Elaini Soares de Lima Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso, Jaciara, MT
  • Arnaldo Gonçalves de Campos Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso, Jaciara, MT
  • Ronaldo Eustáquio Feitoza Senra Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Mato Grosso, Jaciara, MT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820456

Keywords:

Natural sciences, Solid waste, Youth and Adult Education - EJA

Abstract

This study aimed to understand the conceptions of the students of the 2nd segment of the Youth and Adult Education - EJA of the State School Marechal Rondon, about municipal solid waste (MSW). The school in addition to being a center of excellence for this educational modality allows the pedagogical work develops through different practices and different experiences. The methodology used in the research was the case study and used a variety of instruments for data collection such as participant observation and questionnaires, as well as holding an educational intervention that took place in stages such as class to the intervention of presentation ; realization of conceptual diagnosis of MSW; lectures on the subject; workshop on the 3 Rs (reduce, reuse and recycle) and; field class (technical visit) at the municipal recycling shed. The results of the survey showed that the public has researched low level of knowledge on the subject in question, which is of high relevance in the context of the local community and society in general. However, it is clear also, that when working with a local reach problematic properly, issues such as Municipal Solid Waste start to become more important in the construction of knowledge of these students. In addition, it provides an opportunity even the individual's role, making room for the formation of more citizens committed to the social cause to their surroundings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADEODATO, Marise Tissyana Parente Carneiro. Análise das estratégias do projeto para incorporação de princípios e indicadores da sustentabilidade em políticas públicas no município de Jaboticabal – SP. 2005. 264 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Urbana) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2005.

ANDRADE, M.L.F e MASSABNI, V.G. O desenvolvimento de atividades práticas na escola: um desafio para os professores de ciências. Revista Ciência & Educação, v. 17, n. 4, p. 835-854, 2011.

BRASIL. Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Parâmetros curriculares nacionais: Ciências Naturais/Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1998. 138p.

BRASIL. Parâmetros curriculares nacionais: Ciências Naturais/Secretaria de Educação Fundamental. Brasília: MEC/SEF, 1998. 138p.

BRASIL. Lei nº 12.305 de 02 de Agosto de 2010. Institui a Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos; altera a Lei n 9.605, de 12 de fevereiro de 1998; e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União 2010; 3 ago. [acessado 20/10 de 2014 ]. Disponível em: http://www.mncr.org.br/box_2/instrumentos-juridicos/leis-e-decretos-federais/Lei%20%2012.305-2010%20Politica%20de%20Residuos%20Solidos.pdf/view.

FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2002.

FREIRE, Paulo. Naõ há Docência sem Discência - acessado 05/01/15

Disponível em: https://sites.google.com/site/pibidifpi/.../nao-ha-docencia-sem-discencia

GIL, Antônio Carlos. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. Ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.

GOUVEIA, Nelson. Resíduos sólidos urbanos: impactos socioambientais e perspectiva de manejo sustentável com inclusão social. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 17(6):1503-1510, 2012.

LOZANO, Marisa Cubas. Um olhar para a gestão de resíduos sólidos urbanos a partir de indicadores de sustentabilidade. (Dissertação de Mestrado) Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Ambiental/ Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 2012.

MARCONI, M. A.; LAKATOS, E. M. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 7 ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.

NARCIZO, Kaliane Roberta dos Santos. Uma análise sobre a importância de trabalhar Educação Ambiental nas escolas. Rev. eletrônica Mestrado em Educação Ambiental. ISSN 1517-1256, v. 22, janeiro a julho de 2009.

OLIVEIRA, M. M. de. Como Fazer projetos, monografias, dissertações e teses. 5 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2011.

OLIVEIRA NETO, Raul; SOUZA, Luis Eduardo de; PETTER, Carlos Otávio. Avaliação da gestão integrada de resíduos sólidos urbanos no Brasil em comparação com países desenvolvidos. Revista Monografias Ambientais - REMOA v.13, n.5, dez. 2014, p.3809-3820.

SOUZA, Ricardo Gabbay; CORDEIRO, João Sérgio. Gestão estratégica de resíduos sólidos: utilização do balanced scorecard. planejamento e políticas públicas | ppp | n. 32 | jan./jun. 2009.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-19

How to Cite

Silva, V. F. M. da, Lima, E. S. de, Campos, A. G. de, & Senra, R. E. F. (2015). Municipal solid waste as a theme for science education in the Youth and Adult Education (EJA). Monografias Ambientais, 14, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130820456

Issue

REMOA, V.14, 2015, ESPECIAL EDITION: LICENCIATURA EM CIÊNCIAS DA NATUREZA - IFMT – MT

Section

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATIVE PRACTICES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)