A perspective about paints and varnishes’ solid wastes in Sobradinho/RS

Authors

  • Hedelvan Emerson Fardin Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS
  • Jorge Orlando Cuéllar Noguera Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130819812

Keywords:

Solid wastes, Paints and varnishes, Environment

Abstract

This research presents an analysis of paints  and varnishes’ solid wastes  in Sobradinho, RS. It aims to identify the destinations of wastes from these constructive materials that may be taken by the generators without harming the environment. Concurrently, we aim to present the characteristic risks caused by incoherent reject of these wastes, with the purpose to educate generators to avoid the destination of their paints’ wastes or packages to recycling means in different ways to that expected for the maintenance of good environmental context. To create the panorama of these wastes in Sobradinho, a literature search was done in order to conceptualize the monograph’s subject and subsequently, a data survey research in stores that sell paint and varnish in the city, aiming to assess how the employees from these establishments know how to inform their customers about the danger of paints and varnishes for the environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Hedelvan Emerson Fardin, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

Possui graduação em Letras - Português e Literaturas pela Universidade Federal de Santa Maria e Especialização em Educação Ambiental pela mesma Universidade. É graduado em Engenharia Civil pela Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul.

Jorge Orlando Cuéllar Noguera, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS

Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Coordenador do curso de pós-graduação em educação ambiental a distância e professor associado III da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria.

References

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DA EMBALAGEM DE AÇO. As verdades e as mentiras sobre a lata de aço. São Paulo: ABEAÇO, 2006, p.12.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 10004: Resíduos Sólidos – Classificação. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2004.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DOS FABRICANTES DE TINTAS. Resíduos Sólidos. Disponível em: http://www.abrafati.com.br/programas/residuos-solidos/. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2015.

ALVES, Líria. Como é destruída a camada de ozônio? In: BRASIL ESCOLA. Disponível em: http://www.brasilescola.com/quimica/como-destruida-camada-ozonio.htm. Acesso em: 20 jun. 2015.

BONFIM, Gisele. Tintas e Solventes: O que fazer com embalagens/latas com restos de tintas, solventes e vernizes? In: TÉCHNE. Disponível em: http://techne.pini.com.br/engenharia-civil/162/40-perguntas-reciclagem-destinacao-de-residuos-286747-1.aspx. Acesso em: 15 jul. 2015.

BRASIL. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. Resolução CONAMA nº 307: Estabelece diretrizes, critérios e procedimentos para gestão dos resíduos da construção civil. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF, 17 jul. 2002. nº 136.

BRASIL. Lei n. 11.762 de 1º de Agosto de 2008. Fixa o limite máximo de chumbo permitido na fabricação de tintas imobiliárias e de uso infantil e escolar, vernizes e materiais similares e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 1º ago. 2008. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2008/lei/l11762.htm. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2015.

BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Lei n. 12.305 de 2 de Agosto de 2010. Institui a Política de Resíduos Sólidos; Altera a Lei nº 9.605, de 12 de fevereiro de 1998; e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 2 ago. 2010. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/lei/l12305.htm. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2015.

BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Política Nacional dos Resíduos Sólidos. In: MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE. Disponível em: http://www.mma.gov.br/pol%C3%ADtica-de-res%C3%ADduos-s%C3%B3lidos. Acesso em: 15 jul. 2015.

DELONGUI, Lucas. et al. Panorama dos Resíduos da Construção Civil na Região Central do Rio Grande do Sul. Teoria e Prática na Engenharia Civil. Rio Grande, RS, n.18. p.71-80. nov. de 2011.

INSTITUTO PORTO ALEGRE AMBIENTAL. Plano de Gestão Integrada de Resíduos Sólidos: Prefeitura Municipal de Sobradinho/RS. Porto Alegre, dez. de 2012.

SÃO PAULO. Guia Ambiental Tintas e Vernizes – Série P+L. São Paulo: CETESB, 2006. p.42.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-07

How to Cite

Fardin, H. E., & Noguera, J. O. C. (2015). A perspective about paints and varnishes’ solid wastes in Sobradinho/RS. Monografias Ambientais, 15(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130819812

Issue

REMOA, V. 15, N. 1, JAN.-APR., 2016

Section

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

License

Declaration

Available here

Ethical guidelines for journal publication

The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles. 
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.

In particular, 

Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.

Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.

Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Most read articles by the same author(s)