Control of environmental damages due to deposition of solid waste in “Sanga Da Divisa”, Quaraí-RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130818745Keywords:
Environmental Damages, Solid Waste, Sanga da DivisaAbstract
Today the environment is constantly being degraded due to human actions caused by man, the degradation of natural resources as the soil and the water, grows alarmingly resulting in serious damage for all living beings. The importance of these resources is considered for the maintenance and the balance of life on Earth, given that water is the fundamental resource for the existence of life, taking into account its growing shortage largely in the world by the soil pollution and contamination, this study is justified. So the present study had as general purpose to picture the environmental degradation due to deposition of solid waste in some points of the stream Sanga da Divisa, Quaraí-RS, for it, a collection of data and information was held by the City Office of Environment and EMATER, in search of projects aimed to the recovery and preservation of the degraded area and through photographic record it was possible to evidence the current situation in which the stream is. Lastly, based on the results obtained in this study, it was proposed recovery and preservation measures of this area through actions of Environmental Education for the control of the environmental damages due to deposition of solid waste and awareness of local population. Given that this improperly disposed waste has high pollution potential, as well as favoring the proliferation of vectors transmitting infectious diseases and pathogenic microorganisms, it can cause damage to soil and water.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Constituição (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil: promulgada em 5 de outubro de 1988: atualizada até a Emenda Constitucional n. 84, de 2-12-2014. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicaocompilado.htm. Acesso em: 15 dez. 2014.
BRASIL. Lei n. 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981. Dispõe sobre a Política Nacional do Meio Ambiente, seus fins e mecanismos de formulação e aplicação, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF, 02 set. 1981. Disponível em:
http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l6938.htm. Acesso em: 9 out. 2014.
BRASIL. Lei nº 9.795 de 27 de abril de 1999. Dispõe sobre a educação ambiental, institui a Política Nacional de Educação Ambiental e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF, 27 abr. 1999. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9795.htm. Acesso em: 16 dez. 2014.
BRASIL. Lei n. 11.445, de 5 de janeiro de 2007. Estabelece diretrizes nacionais para o saneamento básico; altera as Leis nos 6.766, de 19 de dezembro de 1979, 8.036, de 11 de maio de 1990, 8.666, de 21 de junho de 1993, 8.987, de 13 de fevereiro de 1995; revoga a Lei no 6.528, de 11 de maio de 1978; e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF, 08 jan.
Disponível: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2007/lei/l11445.htm. Acesso em: 28 dez. 2014.
BRASIL. Lei n. 12.305, de 02 de agosto de 2010. Institui a Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos; altera a Lei no 9.605, de 12 de fevereiro de 1998; e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF, 3 ago. 2010. Disponível em:
http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/lei/l12305.htm. Acesso em: 10 out. 2014.
BRASIL. Lei n. 12.651, de 25 de maio de 2012. Dispõe sobre a proteção da vegetação nativa; altera as Leis nos 6.938, de 31 de agosto de 1981, 9.393, de 19 de dezembro de 1996, e 11.428, de 22 de dezembro de 2006; revoga as Leis nos 4.771, de 15 de setembro de 1965, e 7.754, de 14 de abril de 1989, e a Medida Provisória no 2.166-67, de 24 de agosto de 2001; e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União. Brasília, DF, 28 mai. 2012. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12651.htm. Acesso em: 29 dez. 2014.
DEGRADAÇÃO AMBIENTAL. In: Wikipédia, a enciclopédia livre. Disponível em: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrada%C3%A7%C3%A3o_ambiental. Acesso em: 23 out. 2014.
GRACIOLI, C. R.; Impactos ambientais na microbacia do Rio Vacacaí - Mirim em Santa Maria – RS. 2005. 236f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Florestal) Universidade de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2005.
IBGE. INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. Quaraí: dados gerais do município. Disponível
em: http://cidades.ibge.gov.br/painel/painel.php?codmun=431530. Acesso em: 10 set. 2014.
QUARAÍ (RS). Prefeitura. Projeto Executivo: Desassoreamento da Sanga da Divisa, Quaraí, RS. 2005. 47f. Quaraí, RS.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
