Editorial da Edição Especial do Laboratório de Planejamento e Monitoramento Ambiental LPMA/UFSM e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologia Mineral - UNIPAMPA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130816080Resumo
Essa edição especial trás alguns dos trabalhos desenvolvidos pela equipe de trabalho do Laboratório de Monitoramento e Planejamento Ambiental - LPMA/UFSM, coordenada pelo Prof. Dr. Pedro Daniel da Cunha Kemerich, além de trabalhos desenvolvidos por Professores do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologia Mineral da UNIPAMPA, Campus Caçapava do Sul-RS nos últimos anos.
Nesta edição estão sendo apresentados trabalhos que envolvem os mais variados elos que englobam a questão ambiental, além de temas amplamente discutidos atualmente, tais como o aproveitamento de resíduos gerados em processos de tratamento de água; a situação dos resíduos sólidos no Brasil; propriedades físicas e contaminação de solos; vulnerabilidade ambiental e áreas de infiltrações máximas; indicadores de sustentabilidade; o papel do comitê de bacia hidrográfica na gestão dos recursos hídricos; os ruídos causados pela mineração de rochas e ainda; um tema que está ganhando grande repercussão, porém ainda pouco conhecido, a questão ambiental envolvendo os cemitérios no Brasil.
Assim, a equipe agradece ao periódico a oportunidade disponibilizada e desejamos a todos uma boa leitura.
Downloads
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
