Método não destrutivo pelo processo de cravação de tubos na instalação de novas redes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130813646Keywords:
Non-destructive method, piling pipe, sewage disposal system, BR-060Abstract
The case study will be applied by non-destructive method in the implementation of sewage disposal system Alphaville condominium Lands on US-060 in Anapolis-GO. This method can be used for the design of public sanitary sewer, water, gas, telecommunications or other pipe due to site conditions the traditional method becomes impracticable. The crossing under the BR-060 is performed by non-destructive method, the process of crimping the tube by hydraulic jacks without removal of soil, while keeping unchanged the mass of soil without significant damage to the transit of highway in question as a function of economic importance and logistics of highway and the area.
Downloads
References
ABNT - ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 12266: Projeto e execução de valas para assentamento de tubulação de água esgoto ou drenagem urbana. Rio de Janeiro, 1992.
ABNT - ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR 9648: Estudo de concepção de sistemas de esgoto sanitário. Rio de Janeiro, 1986.
ABRATT - ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE TECNOLOGIA NÃO DESTRUTIVA. Disponível em: http://www.abratt.org.br/. Acesso em: 25 de abr. de 2013.
AQUACON, (2008), III Congresso Brasileiro de MND I No-Dig Edição Latino-Americana, Disponível em: http://www.acquacon.com.br/nodigbrasil2008/port/sobre.html. Acesso em: 2013
COUTINO, P.T. & NEGRO JUNIOR, A. (1995). Túneis não tripulados. São Paulo, 1995
FORTES. D, (2010) Estudo do uso do método não destrutivo em travessias de tubulações sob interferência. Disponível em: http://civil.uefs.br/DOCUMENTOS/DIEGO%20REBOU%C3%87AS%20FORTES.pdf. Acesso em 2013.
KAWANA, (2013), Método de cravação de tubos – Detalhamento. Goiânia, 2013
MOUTINHO, A.C & ARIARATNAM, S.T, Introdução ao Método Não Destrutivo. Disponível em: http://www.abratt.org.br/seminario/intro.pdf. Acesso em: 2013
NUVOLARI, A. (2003). Esgoto sanitário: coleta transporte, tratamento e reuso agrícola - São Paulo: Editora Blucler, 2003.
PALAZZO, S. (2007) Introdução ao Método Não destrutivo. Disponível em: http://site.sabesp.com.
br/uploads/file/audiencias_inova%C3%A7%-C3%A3o/Introdu%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20aos%20m%C3%A9todos%20n%C3%A3o%20-%20destrutivos.pdf. Acesso em 2013.
PND, Métodos não destrutivos. Disponível em: http://www.pnd-sp.com.br/secao_metodosnaodestrutivos.shtml. Acesso em: 2013
REN, (2007). Ficha de prevenção e segurança abertura de valas ou trincheiras Disponível em: http://pt.scribd.com/doc/41584959/FPS-18-Abertura-deValas-ou-Trincheiras-Ed02. Acesso em: 2013.
SANEAGO.O esgoto em Goiânia. [S.l.], 2004. Disponível em: http://www.saneago.com.br/novasan/index.php?id=esgoto6&tit=esgoto. Acesso em: 2013
SABESP, Métodos Não Destrutivos em Obras de Saneamento. Disponível em: http://site.sabesp.com.br/site/interna/Default.aspx?secaoId=365. Acesso em: 2013
SUZUKI, C. Y. & ROCHA, M. N. [et, all], (2010) Aplicação do método não destrutivo do tipo pipe bursting para substituição de recalque de esgoto sanitário – Estudo de caso da estação da estação elevatória de esgoto Riviera. Disponível em: http://engenharia.anhembi.br/tcc-10/civil-05.pdf. (2010). Acesso em: 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
