Influence of planting density on growth of brown flaxseed
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130813599Keywords:
Competition, Population variation, Linum usitatissimum L.Abstract
Flaxseed can be consumed as food or feed, besides being used for various other purposes, has a percentage of protein in equal proportion of fibers and mostly oil, usually the product of interest in culture can be grown brown and golden flaxseed. The objective of this study was to analyze the influence of population densities in the culture of brown flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) using the online system of planting, being spaced at 0.45 m. The experiment was conducted at the State University of West Paraná, year 2013 campus, using a completely randomized design with eight systems of planting density: 67, 84, 99, 117, 137, 154, 172 and 190 plants/m2 with six replicates, we performed 130 days after harvesting crops. The vegetative behavior was assessed following the variables fenometric plant height, stem diameter, number of branches of the stem, fresh and dry mass of the aerial part of the plant, number of capsules, fresh and dry seeds. Evaluating the data plotted in generated by applying the Tukey test, the table can not infer the best for high density planting of brown flaxseed aiming to yield grain, only it was noted that high density below 99 plants/m2 reduce productivity in grain brown.
Downloads
References
ALI, M. A., NAWAB, N. N., ABBAS, A., ZULKIFFAL, M., & SAJJAD, M. Evaluation of selection criteria in Cicer arietinum L. using correlation coefficients and path analysis. Australian Journal of Crop Science, v. 3,
n. 2, 2009. p.65–70.
ALVES, D.L.; SILVA, C.R. Fitohormônios: abordagem natural da terapia hormonal. São Paulo: Editora Atheneu, 2003.
ARGENTA, G.S; FERREIRA, P.R.; SANGOI, L. Arranjo de plantas em milho: análise do estado-da-arte. Ciência Rural, v.31, n.6, 2001. p.1075- 1084.
BASSEGIO, D.; SANTOS, R.F.; NOGUEIRA, C.E.C.; CATTÂNEO, A.J.; ROSSETTO, C. Manejo da irrigação na cultura da linhaça. Acta Iguazu, Cascavel, v.1, n.3, 2012. p. 98-107.
BOMBO, A.J. Obtenção e caracterização nutricional de snacks de milho (Zeamays L.) e linhaça (Linum usitatissimun L.). Dissertação Mestrado, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, USP. São Paulo-SP. 2006. 97p.
GABIANA, C. The response of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L) to irrigation,nitrogen and plant population. Dissertação (Master of Applied Science), Lincoln University. Jefferson City, 2005.
IAPAR – Instituto Agronômico do Paraná. Médias históricas em estações do IAPAR. 2011. Disponível em:
http://www.iapar.br/arquivos/Image/monitoramento/Medias_H istoricas/Cascavel.html. Acesso em: 12 abr. 2011.
KAEFER, D.B. Diagnóstico local do município de Cascavel. Universidade Federal do Paraná Setor de Ciências da Saúde. 2007.
KOUBA M. Effect of dietary omega-3 fatty acids on meat quality of pigs and poultry M.C. Teale (Ed.), Omega 3 Fatty Acid Research, Nova Publishers, New York. 2006. p. 225–239.
LISSON, S. N.; MENDHAM, N. J. Agronomic studies of flax (Limon usitatissimwn L.) in a south-eastern Australia. Australian journal of Experimental Agriculture, v.40, 2000. p.1101-1112.
MARQUES, A. C. Propriedades funcionais da linhaça (Linum usitatissimum L.) em diferentes condições de preparo e de uso em alimentos. 2008. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos) – Centro de Ciências Rurais, Universidade de Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, 2008. p.115.
MARQUES, A.C.; HAUTRIVE, T.P.; MOURA, G.B.; COLLEGARO, M.G.K.; HECKTHEUER, L.H.R. Efeito da linhaça (Linum usitatissimum L.) sob diferentes formas de preparo na resposta biológica em ratos. Revista Nutrição, vol.24, n.1, Campinas Jan/Fev, 2011.
MORRIS, D.H.; VAISEY-GENSER, M. Flaxseed. Encyclopedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition, v.10, n.2, 2003. p.2525-2531.
OLIVEIRA, M.R. de; SANTO, R.F.; ROSA, H.A.; WERNER, O.; VIEIRA, M.D.; DELAI, J.M. Fertirrigação da cultura de linhaça Linum usitatissimum. Revista Brasileira de Energias Renováveis, v.1, p.22-32. 2012.
OOMAH, B.D. Flaxseed as a functional food source. J Sci Food Agric. v. 81, 2001. p. 889- 894.
RABETAFIKA, N.H.; REMOORTEL, V.V.; DANTHINE, S. Flaxseed proteins: food uses and health benefits. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, n.46, 2011. p.221–228.
SCHULZ, V.; HÄNSEL, R.; TYLER, V.E. Fitoterapia Racional: um guia de fitoterapia para as ciências da saúde. 4 ed., São Paulo: Manole, 2001.
SILVA, P.R.F. SANGOI, L.; STRIEDER, M.L.; ARGENTA, G. Importância do arranjo de plantas na definição da produtividade do milho. Porto Alegre: Departamento de Plantas de Lavoura da UFRGS: Evangraf, 2006. p.64.
SOARES, L.L; PACHECO, J.T; BRITO, C.M de; TROINA, A. de A.; BOAVENTURA, G.T.; GUZMÁNSILVA, M.A. Avaliação dos efeitos da semente de linhaça quando utilizada como fonte de proteína nas fases de crescimento e manutenção em ratos. Rev. Nutr., v.22, n.4, 2009. p.483-491.
TOMASSONI, F.; SANTOS, R.F.; BASSEGIO, D.; SECCO, D.; SANTOS, F.S.; CREMONEZ, P.A. Diferentes densidades de plantio na cultura da linhaça dourada. Acta Iguazu, Cascavel, v.2, n.3, 2013. p. 8-14.
TRUCOM, C. A importância da linhaça na saúde. São Paulo: Alaúde, 2006, p.152.
VIEIRA, M. D.; SANTOS, R.F.; ROSA, H.A.; WERNER, O.V.; DELAI, J.M.; OLIVEIRA, M.R. Potássio (K) no cultivo da linhaça Linum usitatissimum. Revista Brasileira de Energias Renováveis, v.1, 2012. p.62-69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
