Pinuselliottii on small farms in the north of Rio Grande do Sul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2236130813371Keywords:
Forestry species, Farms, PinuselliottiiAbstract
Pinuselliottii is one of the most important tree species currently used for forestry plantations in Brazil . Its great versatility , its hardiness and adaptability , its excellent growth rate , coupled with the quality of wood and products made with it , have caused the cultivation of Pinus be a success in Brazil . The southern region of Brazil for having a completely favorable climate for the development of the species , and has been a growing increase in areas planted with pine , but agriculture became the main standoff , making this even primary activity in rural areas . Thus , the aim of this study was to conduct a survey in five municipalities in the northern region of the state , totaling 38 farms , making an analysis of how these areas are being implemented pine , and what are the future goals of the producers in this activity , Amongst other things that could be analyzed.Downloads
References
BERTOLANI, F. Programas em andamento e problemas básicos em florestas implantadas de Pinheiros tropicais. In: Congresso IUFRO. Agudos/SP. 1980.
EMPRESA BRASILEIRA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Florestas, Curitiba, PR. Zoneamento ecológico para plantios florestais no estado de Santa Catarina. Brasília, Departamento de Difusão de Tecnologia, 1988. 113p.
IPEF. Curso de treinamento e atualização em experimentação. Circular Técnica 23. Piracicaba. 26-30 p. 1976.
KRONKA, Francisco J. N.; BERTOLANI, Francisco; PONCE, Reinaldo H. A cultura do pinus no Brasil. São Paulo: Sociedade Brasileira de Silvicultura, 2005.
KWASNIESWSKI, Cristian Marcelo; COELHO, Marcio Henrique. Aspectos econômicos do reflorestamento de pinus na pequena propriedade rural: um estudo de caso. 2008. Trabalho apresentado no 4º Encontro de Engenharia dos Campos Gerais, Ponta Grossa, 2008.
PILAU, F. G.; ANGELOCCI, L. R.; SCARPARI, J. A. Radiation balance of an orange tree in orchard and its relation with global solar radiation and grass net radiation. RevistaBrasileira de Agrometeorologia, Santa Maria, v.15, n.3, p.257-266, 2007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Ethical guidelines for journal publication
The REMOA is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviews should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
