Use of multicritery analysis for division of financial resources in public universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2318133848510Keywords:
Análise multicritério, Tomada de decisão, Educação superior, Desempenho acadêmico, Gestão pública.Abstract
This article proposes a model based on multicriteria analysis to support decision making - Prometheé - to assist in the decentralization of funding resources in public universities. For this, secondary data and official indicators referring to the Federal University of Sergipe, defined by TCU and the Ministry of Education, were used in order to expose didactically how this model can be implemented with the support of electronic spreadsheets. The results obtained show the applicability of this model and reinforce the importance of managerial decisions being supported by reliable methodologies, capable of considering the preferences of the decision maker in the light of institutional goals, as well as the complex academic environment of Brazilian public universities.
Key-words: multicriteria analysis; decision making; college education; academic achievement; public management.
Downloads
References
BRANS, Jean-Pierre, MACHARIS, Cathy, KUNSH, Pierra, SCHWANINGER, Makus. Combining multicriteria decision aid and system dynamics for the control of socio-economic processes: an iterative real-time procedure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. North-Holland, v. 109, n. 2, 1998, p. 428-441.
BRANS, Jean-Pierre; MARESCHAL, Bertrand. Promethee methods. In: FIGUEIRA, Jose; GRECO, Salvatore; EHRGOTT, Mathias (eds.) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Boston: Springer, 2005, p. 163-196
BRASIL. Orientações para o cálculo dos indicadores de gestão: decisão TCU n. 408/2002 - plenário. Brasília: TCU, 2014.
BRASIL. Nota técnica n. 16/2018/CGCQES/Daes. Brasília: Inep, 2018.
DINIZ, Josedilton Alves et al. Impactos da descentralização na economicidade de compras governamentais. CONGRESSO CONTROLADORIA E CONTABILIDADE DA USP, 16, 2016. Anais ... São Paulo: USP, 2016. Disponível em https://congressousp.fipecafi.org/anais/artigos162016/252.pdf. Acesso em 14 jul. 2020.
GIL, Antônio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008
GOMES, Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro; SIMÕES GOMES, Carlos Francisco; ALMEIDA, Adiel Teixeira de. Tomada de decisão gerencial: enfoque multicritério. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.
GOMES, Luiz Flávio Autran Monteiro; ARAYA, Marcela Cecilia González; CARIGNANO, Claudia. Tomada de decisão em cenários complexos: introdução aos métodos discretos do apoio multicritério à decisão. São Paulo: Pioneira, Thomson Learning, 2004.
GUIMARÃES, José Ribeiro Soares; JANNUZZI, Paulo de Martino IDH, Indicadores sintéticos e suas aplicações em políticas públicas: uma análise crítica. Revista Brasileira. Est. Urbanos e Regionais, Salvador, v. 7, n. 1, 2005, p. 73-89.
JANNUZZI, Paulo de Martino; MIRANDA, Wilmer Lázaro; SILVA, Daniela Santos Gomes. Análise multicritério e tomada de decisão em políticas públicas: aspectos metodológicos, aplicativo operacional e aplicações. Informática Pública, Belo Horizonte, v. 11, n. 1, 2009, p. 69-87.
NEMERY DE BELLEVAUX, Philippe. On the use of multicriteria ranking methods in sorting problems. Bruxelles: Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2008. 302f. Thesis (Sciences de L'ingenieur). Faculté des Sciences Appliquée.
PMI. Um guia do conhecimento em gerenciamento de projetos. USA: Project Management Institute, 2017.
UFS. Plano de desenvolvimento institucional 2016-2020. Aracaju: UFS, 2016. Disponível em http://oficiais.ufs.br/uploads/page_attach/path/1005/PDI-UFS_2016-2020__1_-min.pdf. Acesso em 5 jun. 2020.
UFS. Anuário estatístico 2016-2018. Aracaju: UFS, 2019. Disponível em http://indicadores.ufs.br/uploads/page_attach/path/7127/Anu_rio_Estat_stico_da_UFS_2016-2017-2018__final.pdf. Acesso em 5 jun. 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors keep copyright and concede to the magazine the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, non-commercial license with no derivative work, which allows to share the work with no author recognition and initial publication in this magazine.
Authors has authorization to overtake additional contracts separately, to distribute a non-exclusive version of the work published in this magazine: For example: to publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter of a book, with authorial recognition and initial publication in this magazine.
Authors are allowed and are encouraged to publish and distribute their work online. For example: in institutional repositories or in their own personal page – at any point before or during the editorial process, because this can result in productive changes, as well as increase the impact and the mention to the published work.