Border studies and International Relations Theories: an emancipatory framework

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797574635

Keywords:

Borders, International Relations Theories, Border studies, Critical Theory, Emancipation

Abstract

Throughout the history of International Relations, borders have been marginalised both practically and, to a greater extent, theoretically. On the one hand, conceptualizations of borders are typically subordinate to other ideas within the field, such as sovereignty, territory, security, conflict, and peace. On the other hand, it is frequently regarded as a source of conflict or simply as a geographical boundary. Thus, it is not surprising that this situation of marginalisation (conventional view of boundaries) produced a hegemonic perspective on borders until the conclusion of the Cold War. Nonetheless, the rearrangement of the international system and the expansion of regional integration resulted in a more dynamic, complex, and multidimensional outline. This work seeks to answer the following research question: in what ways would a perspective contribute to the field of border studies? It is proposed that such a theoretical framework would reassign border studies from an underlying to a fundamental premise, elevating them to a more significant level. This reinterpretation has direct and indirect effects on border politics in practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fernando José Ludwig, Universidade Federal do Tocantins

Doutor. Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Palmas, TO, Brasil.

References

Avritzer, L., & Costa, S. (2004). Teoria crítica, democracia e esfera pública: concepções e usos na América Latina. SciELO Brasil.

Bielschowsky, R. (2000). O regionalismo aberto na América Latina e no Caribe: a integração econômica a serviço da transformação produtiva com equidade. Cinqüenta Anos de Pensamento na CEPAL.

BRASIL. (2012a). Livro Branco de Defesa Nacional. Brasília: Ministério da Defesa

BRASIL. (2012b). Política Nacional de Defesa e Estratégia Nacional de Defesa.

Brasília: Ministério da Defesa

Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Nardin, T., Paterson, M., Reus-Smit, C., & True, J. (2005). Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.

Cardoso, F. H. (1993). As idéias e seu lugar: ensaios sobre as teorias do desenvolvimento. Vozes.

Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1985). Repensando dependência e desenvolvimento na América Latina. Economia e movimentos sociais na América Latina. São Paulo: Brasiliense.

Correia, P. P. (2002). Manual de geopolítica e geoestratégia (Vol. I). Quarteto Ed.

Cox, R. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 10, 126-155.

Cox, R. W. (1992). Towards a post-hegemonic conceptualization of world order: reflections on the relevancy of Ibn Khaldun. In J. N. Rosenau & E.-O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (pp. 132-159). Cambridge University Press.

Cravinho, J. G. (2002). Visões do mundo: as relações internacionais e o mundo contemporâneo. Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.

Dahl, R. A. (2000). Democracia. Temas e Debates.

Dallari, D. d. A. (2005). Elementos de Teoria Geral do Estado. Saraiva.

De Vaus, D. (2001). Research Design in Social Research. Sage.

Devetak, R. (2005). Critical Theory. In S. Burchill, A. Linklater, R. Devetak, J.

Donnelly, M. Paterson, C. Reus-Smit, & J. True (Eds.), Theories of International Relations (pp. 137 - 160). Palgrave.

Donnelly, J. (2005). Realism. In S. Burchill, A. Linklater, R. Devetak, J. Donnelly, M. Paterson, C. Reus-Smit, & J. True (Eds.), Theories of International Relations (pp. 29-54). Palgrave.

Fawcett, L. (2005). Regionalism from an Historical Perspective. In M. Farrell, B. Hettne, & L. V. Langenhove (Eds.), Global Politics of Regionalism: Theory and Practice (pp. 21-37). Pluto Press.

Femia, J. V. (1981). Gramsci's Political Thought - Hegemony, Conseiousness, and the Revolutionary Process. Clarendon Press.

Filho, C. P. C., & Lemos, B. d. O. (2014). Brasil e Mercosul: Iniciativas de Cooperação Fronteiriça Acta Geográfica, 203-219.

Friedman, G. (1981). The political philosophy of the Frankfurt School. Cornell University Press.

Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peach Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167-191.

Gardini, G. L. (2012). Latin America in the 21st Century: Nations, regionalism, globalization. Zed Books.

Geuss, R. (1981). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge University Press.

Gramsci, A. (2011a). Prison Notebooks, Vol. I (Vol. Vol. I). Columbia University Press.

Gramsci, A. (2011b). Prison Notebooks, Vol. II (Vol. Volume II). Columbia University Press.

Gramsci, A. (2011c). Prison Notebooks, Vol. III (Vol. Volume III). Columbia University Press.

Habermas, J. (2012). Teoria do Agir Comunicativo: Sobre a crítica da razão funcionalista WMF Martins Fontes.

Held, D. (1996). Models of Democracy. Polity Press.

Hobsbawm, E. (2008). War, peace and hegemony at the beginning of the twenty-first century. In C. Chari (Ed.), War, Peace and Hegemony in a Globalized World: The changing balance of power in the twenty-first century

(pp. 15 - 24). Routledge.

Hobsbawm, E. J. (2007). Globalização, democracia e terrorismo. Companhia das Letras.

Horkheimer, M. (1976). Traditional and critical theory. Critical Theory: Selected Essays, 288-243.

Hout, W. (1999). Theories of international relations and the new regionalism. In J. Grugel & W. Hout (Eds.), Regionalism Across the North-South Divide: State strategies and globalization (pp. 13-26). Routledge.

Jatobá, D. (2013). Teoria das relações internacionais. Saraiva.

Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. International organization, 36(2), 185-205.

Lamont, C. (2015). Research Methods in International Relations. Sage.

Lenin, V. (1999). Imperialism: The highest stage of capitalism. Resistance Books.

Lenin, V. I. (1959). O Estado e a Revolução: o conceito marxista do poder. Diálogo.

Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of Democracy, government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press.

Linklater, A. (1990). Beyond realism and Marxism: Critical theory and international relations. Springer.

Linklater, A. (1998). Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-westphalian Era. Polity Press.

Linklater, A. (2005). Marxism. In S. e. a. Burchill (Ed.), Theories of International Relations (pp. 110-136). Palgrave.

Ludwig, F. J. (2016). Contrabando, violência, contrabando e a ausência de paz nas regiões de fronteira: uma visão crítica. In F. J. Ludwig & L. S. Barros (Eds.), (Re)Definições das Fronteiras: visões interdisciplinares (pp. 17 - 30). Editora Juruá.

Ludwig, F. J., Sposito, I., & Neto, D. M. (2018). Dinâmicas Securitárias das Fronteiras na América do Sul. In F. J. Ludwig & L. S. Barros (Eds.), (Re)Definições das Fronteiras: velhos e novos paradigmas (pp. 39 - 56). Editora IDESF.

Marcuse, H. (2013). Towards a Critical Theory of Society (Vol. 2). Routledge.

Marx, K. (2000). Karl Marx: selected writings (II ed.). Oxford University Press.

Milza, P. (2002a). As relações internacionais de 1871 a 1914. Edições 70.

Milza, P. (2002b). As relações internacionais de 1918 a 1939. Edições 70.

Mitrany, D. (1948). The functional approach to world organization. International Affairs 24(3), 350-363.

Morgenthau, H. (1947). Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Latimer House Limited.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among Nations: the struggle for power and peace. Alfred A. Knopf.

Nogueira, J. P., & Messari, N. (2005). Teoria das Relações Internacionais, correntes e debates. Elsevier.

Prado, H. S. d. A., & Neto, T. E. (2015). Fronteiras e Relações Internacionais. Editora Íthala.

Quivy, R., & Van Campenhoudt, L. (1998). Manual de Investigação em Ciências Sociais. Gradiva.

Santos, B. d. S. (2002). Os processos da Globalização. In B. d. S. Santos (Ed.), A globalização e as ciências sociais (pp. 25-102). Cortez Editora.

Santos, T. d. (2000). A teoria da dependência: balanços e perspectivas. Civilização Brasileira.

Santos, T. d. (2003). Unipolaridade ou hegemonia compartilhada. In T. d. Santos (Ed.), Os impasses da Globalização (pp. 46-106). Loyola.

Scherma, M. A. (2012). As Fronteiras nas Relações Internacionais. Monções 1(1), 102-132.

Smith, W. D. (1980). Friedrich Ratzel and the origins of Lebensraum. German Studies Review, 3(1), 51-68.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). A globalização e seus malefícios. Futura.

Stokes, D. (2005). America’s other war - Terrorizing Colombia. Zed Books.

Vaisse, M. (1997). As relações internacionais desde 1945. Edições 70.

Vaughan-Williams, N. (2009). Border Politics: The Limits of Sovereign Power: The Limits of Sovereign Power. Edinburgh University Press.

Wallerstein, I. (1991). The Politics of the World Economy: The states, the movements, and the civilizations Cambridge University Press.

Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An introduction. Duke university Press.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.

Wiggershaus, R. (1995). The Frankfurt School: Its history, theories, and political significance. MIT Press.

Wilson, R. (2007). Theodor Adorno. Routledge.

Wright, Q. (1942). A Study of War. University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-28

How to Cite

Ludwig, F. J. (2023). Border studies and International Relations Theories: an emancipatory framework. Revista InterAção, 14(3), e74635. https://doi.org/10.5902/2357797574635