Employment, income and the environment: an analysis for Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X42087Keywords:
Input-output, Job, Income, Mato Grosso do Sul, Emission of CO2Abstract
The state of Mato Grosso do Sul (MS) has been one of the states that has registered rates of growth, both GDP and population since 2002. This economic and population growth, in turn, generates constant concerns about the environment, since increasing the income and employment, the pressure on the environment also tends to grow generating, for example, higher emissions of greenhouse gases. In this sense, the objective of this research was to measure the employment and income multipliers for MS state and to associate the results to the sectors of CO2 emissions. The method consisted of using the input-output matrix (MIP) of MS of the year 2010 and, from this matrix, find the income and employment multipliers of the State. The MIP used was of 32 × 32-dimension (sectors) and was aggregated based on the MS energy balance sectors thus creating a new 14 x 14 (sectors) matrix. The results show that there is a reversal in the results, with the income multiplier presenting greater power of externalities (positive or negative) to the environment, while the employment multiplier generates fewer externalities, due to the main activities that cause impacts multiplication.
Downloads
References
CARVALHO, T. S. PEROBELLI, F. S. 2009. Avaliação da intensidade de emissões de CO2 setoriais e na estrutura de exportações. Economia aplicada, São Paulo, v. 13, n. 1, p. 99-124.
CMMD. 1987. World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FACHINELLI, A. S. M. GUILHOTO, J. J. MORETO, A. C. RODRIGUES, R. L. SESSO FILHO, H. 2012. Multiplicador de emprego e salário: estudo comparativo para a região sul e restante do Brasil em 1999 e 2004. Munich Personal Repec Archive.
FAGUNDES, M. B. B. DIAS, D. T. FRAINER, D. M. FIGUEIREDO NETO, L. F. TREDEZINI, C. A. O. 2014. Desoneração do ICMS no setor da Agropecuária: Impactos sobre a economia do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Regional, v. 2, p.119-144.
FIELD AND FILED. 2014. Introdução à economia do meio ambiente. 6ed. Porto Alegre: AMGH.
FREITAS, L. F. S. 2014. Padrão de consumo e pressão ambiental no Brasil. Revista de economia contemporânea. v. 18 (1), p. 100-124.
FEIJÓ, C. A. Contabilidade social. 2013. Elsevier, Rio de Janeiro.
GUILHOTO, J. J. Input-Output Analysis: Theory and Foundations. 2011. Munich Personal Repec Archive, Universidade de São Paulo.
GUILHOTO, J. J. M.; SESSO FILHO, U. A. 2010. Estimação da matriz insumo-produto utilizando dados preliminares das contas nacionais. Economia e tecnologia, v. 23, p. 53-53.
LEAL, R. A. ELY, R. A. UHR, J. G. Z. UHR, D. A. P. 2015. Ciclos econômicos e emissão de CO2 no Brasil: uma análise dinâmica para políticas ambientais ótimas. Revista Brasileira de Economia, v. 69, p. 53-73.
LEIVAS, P. H. FEIJÓ, F. T. 2014. Estrutura produtiva e multiplicadores de impacto intersetorial do Conselho Regional de Desenvolvimento da Região Sul (Corede Sul) do Rio Grande do Sul: uma análise de insumo-produto. Ensaios FEE, v. 35, n. 2, p. 521-554.
LIMA, A. R. LENHARDT, P. R. 2007. Ganhos no emprego e renda do estado do RS causados pela redução do uso de insumos químicos - um estudo de insumo-produto. Rev. Bras. Agroecologia, v.2, n.1, p. 1496-1499.
MILLER, R. E.; BLAIR, P. D. 2009. Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MOTTA, R. S. 2002. Padrão de consumo, distribuição de renda e o meio ambiente no Brasil. IPEA, Rio de Janeiro.
MONTOYA, M. A. PASQUAL, C. 2015. A. o uso setorial de energia renovável versus não renovável e as emissões de CO2 na economia brasileira: um modelo insumo-produto híbrido para 53 setores. Pesquisa e planejamento econômico, v. 45, n. 2, p. 289-335.
NAJBERG, S.; IKEDA, M. 1999. Modelos de geração de emprego: metodologia e resultados. Textos para Discussão BNDES, n.72, Rio de Janeiro-Brasil.
KURESKI, R. MAIA, M. RODRIGUES, R. L. HARDT, L. P. A. Multiplicadores de emprego e renda da indústria brasileira de açúcar em 2004: Uma aplicação da matriz de insumo-produto. In.: Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia, Administração e Sociologia Rural, 2008, Rio Branco. Anais...Rio Branco, p. 1-16.
SEMAGRO. 2016. Secretaria de Estado de Meio Ambiente, Desenvolvimento Econômico, Produção e Agricultura Familiar. Perfil Estatístico do Mato Grosso do Sul, 2015. Campo Grande: SEMAGRO.
SEEG. 2018. Sistema de Estimativas de Emissões e Remoções de Gases de Efeito Estufa. Disponível em http://seeg.eco.br/.
SOMMER, M. KRATENA, K. 2017. The carbon footprint of European households and income distribution. Ecological Economics, London, v. 136, p. 62–72.
Published
Versions
- 2022-04-26 (2)
- 2020-06-29 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Ciência e Natura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
