THE ORGANIC RICE PRODUCTION IN SETTLEMENT NOVO HORIZONTE II, LOCATED IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF SANTA MARGARIDA DO SUL / RS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X17491Keywords:
arroz orgânico, sustentável, agroecologia, assentamento Novo Horizonte II, Santa Margarida do Sul/RS.Abstract
The article is about the production of organic rice in the settleent Novo Horizonte II, located in the municipality of Santa Margarida do Sul / RS. This is a alternative agriculture based on agroecology, considering economic, social and environmental concerns. The study area has the diversification in production, that ensuring the autonomous production and sustainability, providing the conditions of permanence of the man in the field. In this settlement various types of organic rice are produced, the settlers involved with this production system are constantly looking for the techniques, technologies, methods and methodologies to facilitate and better suited to this production, guaranteeing earningsin quality and quantity produced. This type of production potentiate the local and regional development. With the passage of time is noticed an improvement in consumer acceptance with organic products.Downloads
References
ALENCAR, M. T. de; MENEZES, A. V. C. de. Ação do Estado na produção do espaço rural: Transformações territoriais. In: CAMPO-TERRITÓRIO: revista de geografia agrária, v.3, n.5, p.113-133, fev. 2009. Disponível em: <http://www.campoterritorio.ig.ufu.br/>. Acesso em: 24 fev. 2013.
BARROS, A. de J. P. de; LEHFELD, N. A. de S. Projeto de pesquisa: propostas metodológicas. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes, 1990.
BRUNO, R. Agronegócio e novos modos de conflituosidade. In: FRENANDES, B. M. (org.). Campesinato e agronegócio na América Latina: a questão agrária atual. São Paulo: Expressão Popular, 2008.
CAPORAL, F. R. COSTABEBER, J. A. Análise multidimensional da sustentabilidade: uma proposta metodológica a partir da Agroecologia. Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural Sustentável, v.3, n.3, p.70-85, jul./set. 2002 b.
CHAYANOV. A. Sobre a teoria dos sistemas econômicos não capitalistas. In: SILVA, J. G. da; STOLCKE, V. (org.). A questão agrária. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1981, p. 133-164.
CORRÊA, R. L. Espaço: um conceito chave em geografia. In: CASTRO, I. E. de; GOMES, P. C. da C.; CORRÊA, R. L. Geografia: conceitos e temas. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 1995.
DAVID, C. de. Agricultura familiar em assentamentos rurais: contribuições à dinâmica regional do sul do estado do Rio Grande do Sul. In: MARAFON, G. J.; PESSÔA, V. L. S. (Org.). Agricultura, desenvolvimento e transformações socioespaciais: reflexões interinstitucionais e constituição de grupos de pesquisa no rural e no urbano. Uberlândia/MG: Assis Editora, 2008. p.15 – 38.
DEMO, P. Metodologia do Conhecimento Científico. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.
EMBRAPA. Embrapa Agrobiologia. Fundamentos da agricultura orgânica. Sistemas de Produção, 2 – 2ª Edição. ISSN 1806-2830. Versão Eletrônica. Dez. 2006. Disponível em: http://sistemasdeproducao.cnptia.embrapa.br/FontesHTML/Cafe/CafeOrganico_2ed/fundamentos.htm>. Acesso em: 07 de jul. 2013.
FERNANDES, B. M. Questões teórico-metodológicas da pesquisa geográfica em assentamentos de reforma agrária. Núcleo de Estudos, Pesquisas e Projetos de Reforma Agrária. Presidente Prudente: UNESP, 1998.
IBGE. INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DE GEOGRAFIA E ESTATÍSTICA. CIDADES@. Disponível em: <http://www.cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/perfil.php?lang=&codmun=431697&search=rio-grande-do-sul|santa-margarida-do-sul >. Acesso em: 01 mai. 2014.
NORDER, L. A. C. Mercantilização da agricultura e desenvolvimento territorial. 2004. In: SCHNEIDER, Sérgio. A Diversidade da Agricultura Familiar. Porto Alegre: Ed. UFRGS, 2009.
PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL SANTA MARGARIDA DO SUL. A CIDADE. Disponível em: <http://www.santamargaridadosul.com/new/?lk=cidade>. Acesso em: 01 mai. 2014.
SAUER, S. Reforma agrária e geração de emprego e renda no meio rural. São Paulo: ABET, 1998.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
