Urban floristics in southern Minas Gerais, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40859Keywords:
Urban afforestation, Floristic survey, Vertical landscapingAbstract
The urban afforestation is an important tool for the formation of a city with an environmental quality. The present project has the aim to provide the qualitative inventory of all tree species and their respective families, in the neighborhood of Véu das Noivas, located in the west region of the municipality of Poços de Caldas, Minas Gerais. For each tree, geographic coordinates were collected and the species identified, with the help of experts, and with the material available in “Jardim Botânico de Poços de Caldas” foundation and bibliographies. Together, all species make a total of 497 individuals, once 185 in green spaces, 211 were located close to public highways and 101 were located close to the walls of some buildings. Among these trees, 44 species were found in green spaces, 54 in streets and 19 in vertical landscaping, distributed in 27 families present in green areas, 25 in streets and 14 in vertical landscaping. It was also noticed exotical species compose most part of the analyzed trees. It’s important to remember that the usage of adequate species in urban afforestation is directly related to a correct urban planning.
Downloads
References
AMATO-LOURENÇO, L. F.; MOREIRA, T. C. L.; ARANTES, B. L. de; SILVA FILHO, D. F. da; MAUAD, T. Metrópoles, cobertura vegetal, áreas verdes e saúde. Estudos Avançados, São Paulo. 2016; 30(86):113-130. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ea/v30n86/0103-4014-ea-30-86-00113.pdf. Acessed in: 18 May 2019.
BARBOSA, M. C.; FONTES, M. S. G. de C. Jardins verticais: modelos e técnicas. Parc Pesquisa em Arquitetura e Construção. 2016; 7(2): 114-124. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Available at: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/parc/article/view/8646304/14825. Acessed in: 12 May 2018.
BUCKERIDGE, M. Árvores urbanas em São Paulo: planejamento, economia e água. Estudos Avançados. 2015; 29(84): 85-101. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-40142015000200085&lng=en&nrm=iso. Acessed in: 28 Jun. 2019.
CEMIG. COMPANHIA ENERGÉTICA DE MINAS GERAIS. Manual de Arborização. 2011. Available at: http://www.cemig.com.br/sites/imprensa/ptbr/Documents/Manual_Arborizacao_Cemig_Biodiversitas.pdf. Acessed in: 29 Oct. 2017.
DADVAND, P.; BARTOLL, X.; BASAGAÑA, X.; DALMAU-BUENO, A.; MARTINEZ, D.; AMBROS, A.; CIRACH, M.; TRIGUERO-MAS, M.; GASCON, M.; BORRELL, C.; NIEUWENHUIJSEN, M. J. Green spaces and General Health: Roles of mental health status, social support, and physical activity. Environment International, 2016; 91: 161-167. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412016300666. Acesso em: 18 May 2019.
FLORA DO BRASIL ONLINE. FBO. Flora do Brasil 2020 em construção. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Available at: http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov.br. Acessed in: 16 May 2018.
FREITAS, W. K. de; PINHEIRO, M. A. S.; ABRAHÃO, L. L. F. Análise da Arborização de Quatro Praças no Bairro da Tijuca, RJ, Brasil. Floresta e Ambiente; 2015; 22(1): 23-31. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872015000100023&lng=pt&tlng=pt. Acessed in: 29 Jun. 2019.
GOZALO, G. R.; MORILLAS, J. M. B.; GONZÁLEZ, D. M.; MORAGA, P. A. Relationships among satisfaction, noise perception, and use of urban green spaces. Science Of The Total Environment. 2018; 624: 438-450. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004896971733574X#f0005. Acessed in: 18 May 2019.
KRAMER, J. A.; KRUPEK, R. A. Caracterização florística e ecológica da arborização de praças públicas do município de Guarapuava, PR. Revista Árvore. 2012; 36(4): 647-658. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-67622012000400007&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt. Acessed in: 28 Jun. 2019.
MARICATO, E.; COLOSSO, P.; COMARÚ, F. de A. Um projeto para as cidades brasileiras e o lugar da saúde pública. Saúde em Debate. 2018; 42(3): 199-211. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-11042018000700199&lang=pt. Acessed in: 29 Jun. 2019.
PREFEITURA MUNICIPAL DE POÇOS DE CALDAS. PMPC. Revisão do plano diretor do munícipio de Poços de Caldas. Poços de Caldas: Prefeitura de Poços de Caldas, 2006.
SAITO, N. S.; ARGUELLO, F. V. P.; MOREIRA, M. A.; SANTOS, A. R. dos; EUGENIO, F. C.; FIGUEIREDO, A. C. Uso da geotecnologia para análise temporal da cobertura florestal. Cerne. 2016; 22(1): 11-18. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-77602016000100011&lang=pt. Acessed in: 29 Jun. 2019.
SILVA, L. L. H. da; OLIVEIRA, E.; CALEGARI, L.; PIMENTA, M. C.; DANTAS, M. K. L. Características Dendrométricas, Físicas e Químicas da Myracrodruon urundeuva e da Leucaena leucocephala. Floresta e Ambiente. 2017; 24: 1-8. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872017000100134&lang=pt. Acessed in: 28 Jun. 2019.
THE PLANT LIST (2018). Version 1. Available at: http://www.theplantlist.org/. Acessed in: 16 May 2018.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
