Urban Mobility Planning for small cites: the case of Cachoeira do Sul, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X40588Keywords:
Mobility Plan, Cities, SustainabilityAbstract
Following the approval of Law 12.587.12 and an institution of the National Urban Mobility Policy, Brazilian municipalities started adapting new principles of sustainable mobility, thus preparing their Mobility Plans. The city of Cachoeira do Sul, with support from the Santa Maria Federal University (Cachoeira do Sul Campus), has recently developed its plan that focus on current city needs and prioritizing non-motorized modes of transport and public transport services. This paper aims at presenting the process of developing the Plan and extension actions to promote it. During its development, meetings and workshops related to the theme were held, as well as public audiences and technologies were again involved in the analysis of the city's needs regarding mobility. The information collected based diagnostics and analysis to solve current problems. Finally, this paper also presents activities related to the implementation of the Urban Mobility Plan, which shall succeed through actions implemented, their effective monitoring and the support of the population for the principles of sustainable mobility.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Lei N° 12.587/12, de 3 de janeiro de 2012. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo, Brasília, DF, 4 jan. 2012.
BRASIL. Política Nacional de Mobilidade Urbana. Ministério das Cidades. Brasília, 2013.
CACHOEIRA DO SUL. Plano de Mobilidade de Cachoeira do Sul. PlanMob. Prefeitura Municipal. Abril de 2019.
ONU-Organização das Nações Unidas. Plataforma Agenda 2030. 2015. Disponível em: http://www.agenda2030.com.br/.
SIQUEIRA R G, ALVES L, HUMBERTO M. Avaliação da Efetividade da PNMU: perfil dos municípios e contribuições para o avanço da política. 32º Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes da ANPET. 2018;32:150-159.
WRI BRASIL. Sete Passos: Como construir um plano de mobilidade urbana. São Paulo, 2018. Disponível em: http://wribrasil.org.br/pt/publicacoes/sete-passos-como-construir-um-plano-de-mobilidade-urbana/.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
To access the DECLARATION AND TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AUTHOR’S DECLARATION AND COPYRIGHT LICENSE click here.
Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication
The Ciência e Natura journal is committed to ensuring ethics in publication and quality of articles.
Conformance to standards of ethical behavior is therefore expected of all parties involved: Authors, Editors, Reviewers, and the Publisher.
In particular,
Authors: Authors should present an objective discussion of the significance of research work as well as sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the experiments. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Review Articles should also be objective, comprehensive, and accurate accounts of the state of the art. The Authors should ensure that their work is entirely original works, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, this has been appropriately acknowledged. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Authors should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal. The corresponding Author should ensure that there is a full consensus of all Co-authors in approving the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
Editors: Editors should evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit. An Editor must not use unpublished information in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the Author. Editors should take reasonable responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper.
Reviewers: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should be conducted objectively, and observations should be formulated clearly with supporting arguments, so that Authors can use them for improving the paper. Any selected Reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor and excuse himself from the review process. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
